It's Almost Fall

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,183
26,653
113
So, me linking an article saying they don't know why cancer rates among young Aussies are extremely high is the same as me SAYING without doubt that the death jab was the cause? The article says the Aussies are baffled as to the cause. While I can't say the death jab is the cause, I can say the proudly most vaccinated nation on Earth should explore the possibility that the death jab is part of the problem. After all, Pfizer and the CDC wanted to put a lid on releasing the data until 2076 when most people are dead. I believe the current status is at least 2030 thanks to Biden.

Judge: FDA Cannot Have Until 2076 to Disclose Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine Data - BioSpace

You are "just asking questions," ala Donald Trump.

In all seriousness, science will ask these questions if there is evidence of a link. So you really will get your proof if it's there to be had ... I have doubts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,183
26,653
113
All that tells you is every single Democrat disapproves of every single R. Classic derangement.

Many people probably can’t name more than a couple of the Cabinet members.



I actually agree with your take here. But the large majority of Rs is "approving" each one as well. RFK's less bad popularity is a function of a few Dems approving a guy they know was a long time D and is a Kennedy.

If people weren't just voting party, I strong suspect RFK would be the least popular Cabinet member among Republicans. Except maybe Tulsi. But when strong approval and "I won't say I disapprove but I'm not sold" get the same rating, he makes out well.
 

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,563
6,575
113
When are these activist judges going to start feeling embarrassed about their moronic decisions getting consistently overruled?


It is called a stay to allow appellate review. Very common .Nothing to do with being blocked for being moronic.
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,088
11,438
113
Trump invites Bill Gates to the WH, and working with him on gene editing/vaccines. What could go wrong?

He went from Elon advising him to Gates.
 

djpc

All-American
Nov 2, 2001
15,828
6,830
93
Might be the most ignorant “death jab” post yet.

The prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular risk has been increasing and impacting younger adults for a long time. We have the most unhealthy population on earth.

If TJ had read the article instead of reposting some engagement bait he might’ve picked up on this. He couldn’t because the rage bait doesn’t even link the article, it’s just a screenshot of a headline. You guys can’t possibly be this gullible?

Would love to hear Rasmussen’s pathophysiology linking the vaccine to permanent rises in blood pressure.

Brain rot.
I don't follow Rasmussen enough that I'd decipher a clear RNA shot undertone to that post, but I was going to hop in and say essentially what you said sans the political spin.

Two things jumped to mind. First is what you'd said ... this (the rise of chronic diseases once considered diseases of aging among younger population cohorts) has been occurring for a while, and not just BP. Things like type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease, etc., along with the beginnings hypertension are increasing in younger populations, and even in children. My feeling is that the increasing prevalence of highly palatable food-like substances in the food supply is the primary culprit, and if there was a bump in the prior upward trend of occurrences 5 years ago it most likely came from the lockdown and accompanying changes in eating patterns, though we won't be able to say for sure until some proper and intellectually honest safety assessments of the RNA shots are published for all to see.

The other thing that comes to mind is, sadly, a dollop of cynicism. Any time a recommendation to essentially prescribe more pharmaceuticals to more people comes out I become suspicious of conflicts of interest and financial incentives from those who stand to gain from wider distribution of the pills/shots. I'm sure that for a lot of people lifestyle improvements can go a long way towards lowering blood pressure, and have beneficial side effects that extend well beyond mitigating hypertension. In the case of the article in question it seems to be a pitch for dispensing GLP-1 mimicking drugs to younger people to control weight. I heard in a podcast recently that things like Wegovy are third-generation products in that branch of peptide therapies, and that there are 4th- and 5th-generation successors in the pipeline that purport to provide the same exogenous appetite-suppressing effect with fewer side effects. But to me that seems like it should be a last resort when it comes to young people who likely still have a good probability of being able to fix their metabolism through lifestyle choices.
 

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,563
6,575
113
Which R Senators support irreversible hormonal "therapies" for children?
Read! My comment was in reply to the list of the contributions received by the Democrats from the pharmaceutical industry. Also since you bit on Vance's nonsense, read the Wall Street Journal Editorial on what a stupid comment by Vance.
 

JeffT819

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2001
1,621
1,231
113


The idea of individual rights is a political/philosophical construct not a spiritual one. There is a bill of rights in the Constitution not in the Bible. The New Testament talks of dependence on God and service to others. In the writings of CS Lewis, those who talk about their rights are those furthest from God. The Bible is about community not individualism.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: stoneaxe27

Uncoach

All-American
Dec 8, 2011
5,954
7,983
113
Make people dumb and less employable. Must rely on socialist/communist government to feed in the future. Pathetic education system and some culture issues, some of which was created by our government need serious fixing.

 
  • Angry
Reactions: AzIllini

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
5,851
6,719
113
You are "just asking questions," ala Donald Trump.

In all seriousness, science will ask these questions if there is evidence of a link. So you really will get your proof if it's there to be had ... I have doubts.
I'm not so sure science is allowed to ask these questions. The Global Warming Cartel does not allow dissent and there is a high-level disinformation campaign against those who dare to disagree.

Another example, illegal aliens. I'm always told who is going to "pick your crops"? After yesterday's raid and arrest of 450 illegals in Georgia at the Hyundai EV plant the new question is "who is going to make the batteries for your EVs"?
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
5,851
6,719
113
Disgusting to see these tech mogul billionaires kissing arse and sucking up as if they were in the Cabinet. Spineless suckups.
While I understand your view, they are also doing right for their companies and shareholders. After all, Trump is doing many, many things that promote America, their companies, and their share prices. In turn, their companies create massive wealth for countless Americans.

Trump is doing many things
  1. Massive energy increases
  2. Protection against European tyranny via fake investigations designed to confiscate tens of billions
  3. Investment in AI
  4. Investment in America
  5. Garnering massive international investment in these companies
  6. Reducing regulation and facilitating trade deals
For once, we agree that most of these guys are fakes.
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
5,851
6,719
113
So much for RFK Jr’s negative numbers. As a disclaimer, I haven’t had a chance to compare this poll to the negative one-questions asked, demographics, etc.


RFK Jr. was always going to be popular since health is HIS issue. He's hardly a rabid partisan and his "enemy" is the CDC, Big Pharma, and a bunch of bought and paid for Senators.