Both rivals and scoutcalculate precise score algorithms for the February rankings, but for August just have one guy eyeball the list and move a few schools up or down a couple spots. In 2009, Ole Miss lost 7 of their top 9 recruits, and only got bumped downa couplespots, when they should have dropped 7-10 or more. That same year, Stateonly lost a few 2-starrecruits, yet only moved up one or two positionsin August. There were teamsthat were barely ahead of State in February, lost 3- and 4-star recruits, andstayed ahead of State. Of course, teams that didn't lose any would stay or improve their position.
A true re-ranking in August that was published and used would help compare classes better. I guess the services just don't care to do it right, probably because the season is about to start and no one cares about recruiting rankings, plusschools outside theSouthdon't lose as many recruits between February and August.
Of course, the BEST re-ranking would be 3-4 years later, after the players have had a chance to get on the field and contribute. I'd like to see the 2008 class ranked based onhow they did over the past few years.
A true re-ranking in August that was published and used would help compare classes better. I guess the services just don't care to do it right, probably because the season is about to start and no one cares about recruiting rankings, plusschools outside theSouthdon't lose as many recruits between February and August.
Of course, the BEST re-ranking would be 3-4 years later, after the players have had a chance to get on the field and contribute. I'd like to see the 2008 class ranked based onhow they did over the past few years.