Are you seriously trying to make an argument about fundamentals by using stats? This is the problem with our bball fans that try to act like they know so much. The only way to judge fundamentals is with your damn eyes.muddawgs33 said:
Jason King comments in his chat about our basketball team.
- Thread starter mstatefan88
- Start date
- Status
I just didn't throw that in the first sentence. UK is # 1 in defensive fg percentage because of their players period. Sure Cal coaches em defense, but you don't coach. He hasn't had to coach Anthony Davis too much to do what he's doing in the paint. If he stayed 3 years, he may break Jarvis' shot block record by then. He is unreal. Cal is all about recruiting and nobody does it better. Now how he gets all these 5 star guys is another question.
We want to have a good season. When you are almost losing to crappy teams because of crappy coaching and fundamentals and lazy play, its gonna get talked about no matter what. Not because we want to *****, but because we want to see our team reach it's potential. I have been watching Stansbury ball for too long. Underachieving gets very old after a decade and a half.
http://www.secdigitalnetw...s/2011Stats/CONFONLY.HTM
It's the SEC conference only stats. Notice that we're no. 2 in scoring.
It's the SEC conference only stats. Notice that we're no. 2 in scoring.
in conjunction with our talent level then we'd be pretty damn well unstoppable. You continue to have zero idea of anything related to basketball fundamentals. I was us to win every single game. I just get frustrated when I see how much better we could be if we simply took advantage of **** that every basketball player was supposed to have learned in the 7th grade...
<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">You damn right I am. What do you think caused us to have those consistent good defenses? Talent? Luck? Everybody else sucked at defense and we sucked less than them? It was fundamentals dumbass. If you have poor defensive fundamentals, do you think that means you are going to have a good defense? Hell, no. So if you are putting out good defenses, then you have to be teaching defensive fundamentals. </span></div>
</span>
<div><span style="font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">You damn right I am. What do you think caused us to have those consistent good defenses? Talent? Luck? Everybody else sucked at defense and we sucked less than them? It was fundamentals dumbass. If you have poor defensive fundamentals, do you think that means you are going to have a good defense? Hell, no. So if you are putting out good defenses, then you have to be teaching defensive fundamentals. </span></div>
Everyone knows that. Good fundamentals will make your defense even better. You are the dumbass. The only way to judge fundamentals is to watch what the players are doing during a game. Not by looking at a number on a sheet of paper. That is not my opinion. That is 100% 17'n fact. I guarantee you that. Don't call me "the dumbest poster" and then make an argument against me that is just not true. Thank you.I hope you have agreat got damn day.
- Status