A lot of those players were the face of the league simply because they were/are exceptional players and (for a majority of them) in larger markets. There are plenty of players right now that have a team first, humble mind state that you speak of. A lot of these guys, however, are in smaller markets. Why do you think you hear more about Blake Griffin than you do Kevin Durant? It's not because Blake is a better player than KD which I don't think is up for debate, but it's because the Clippers are finally good and that they are in Los Angeles. Just look at ESPN every now and then (their website included) and there will be more articles about the Clippers, Lebron, Mavs and a few others than there will be of OKC and Chicago (the two best teams) because all of those are bigger markets especially when compared to OKC.<div>
</div><div>Derrick Rose fits that same exact mold, Chris Paul is starting to get a little bit more of his due now that he's gone to LA, and there are a few others in the league that may not be super stars but they do fit that mold. The special things about Jeremy is 1) He's Asian American. 2) He came from no where. 3) He's turning a team around that had been underachieving with the likes of Carmelo Anthony and AmareStoudemire. 4) He's in New York. I agree that the league needs more players like him, but it has nothing to do with the league trying to show the players that fit a particular mold and market that. If that were the case, then LeBron James would not be as marketable as he has become. I don't consider him the type of player mentally like Jeremy, but he's nothing like you described what you think the league tries to go after either.</div>