Nothing funnier than the truth!!!
Babylon Bee - Journalist At NPR Suspended, Leading To Shocking Discovery There Was A Journalist At NPR
Babylon Bee is the definitive source of fake news you can trust.
babylonbee.com
I'm sure the AP is filled ''journalistic integrity''. lolAfter reading the AP story, the writer deserved to be suspended. He then chose to resign. NPR didn't do anything wrong.
I'm sure the AP is filled ''journalistic integrity''. lol
The AP is typically in the middle, but on the bias scale it does skew slightly left.I'm sure the AP is filled ''journalistic integrity''. lol
So, NPR retaliated against a whistleblower, and it's the whistleblowers fault. Got it.
They didn't retaliate. They suspended because a writer wrote for a competitor. You know, non-compete?
Somebody finally told the truth about NPR and NPR wasn't going to be the one to do it.That would be the act of whistleblowing.
Otherwise, you'd be asking NPR to publish a story about how biased NPR is. On top of the fact that burying stories they don't like is one of the accusations.
I think your argument is trying to debate the circumstances of the whistleblowing in order to divert from the facts he brought to light.
I have family members who also think NPR is pretty middle of the road. But they are very liberal. And I think it speaks to the idea that people think the "news" agency that tells them what they want to hear is really the one that's non biased. (I think the term is confirmation bias?)
That would be the act of whistleblowing.
Otherwise, you'd be asking NPR to publish a story about how biased NPR is. On top of the fact that burying stories they don't like is one of the accusations.
I think your argument is trying to debate the circumstances of the whistleblowing in order to divert from the facts he brought to light.
I have family members who also think NPR is pretty middle of the road. But they are very liberal. And I think it speaks to the idea that people think the "news" agency that tells them what they want to hear is really the one that's non biased. (I think the term is confirmation bias?)
That's not at all whistleblowing. Whistleblowing is airing out a practice that is either illegal or non-ethical
Most companies have non-compete clauses. If that was whistleblowing, then the writer would have the right to sue NPR for retaliation. The only thing the writer said is that NPR lost people's trust because they are rigidly left leaning.
They've always been left leaning. What the writer wrote was not something that isn't known. It's the way in which he went about being critical. It's truly no different than any other job. Actually, I think quite a few of us would be fired for publicly stating negative things about our employer, not even suspended.
Also, NPR didn't even try to bury the story. In fact, you can find their story about suspending him. It's still on their website.
We can just call it an ''insider's perspective'' that those who are currently employed are reluctant to give for obvious reasons.
My point exactly which is why I proposed the ''insider's perspective'' replacement for ''whistleblower'' to eliminate the smoke screen.That works. If the word "whistleblower" is so problematic, call it something else.
NPR got publicly shamed, retaliated, and he took his ball and went home rather than accept suspension.
Arguing over the details simply takes away from the main point. NPR is not a news organization, but borderline propaganda. Publicly funded to boot.
It's a terrible idea but, like every other government program, once it's created. It is never terminated despite how circumstances change.The last really good NPR piece was the Pete Schweddy interview. Since then, not so great.
Why is it a good idea to have a state-funded media outlet?
That works. If the word "whistleblower" is so problematic, call it something else.
NPR got publicly shamed, retaliated, and he took his ball and went home rather than accept suspension.
Arguing over the details simply takes away from the main point. NPR is not a news organization, but borderline propaganda. Publicly funded to boot.
So all it takes is one reporter, from any news organization, to give their opinion and that is the absolute truth? (As long as that opinion rips down that particular organization of course.)
Is this fake news or not. The article says "fake news", or is that a lie and it is really not fake news?Nothing funnier than the truth!!!
Babylon Bee - Journalist At NPR Suspended, Leading To Shocking Discovery There Was A Journalist At NPR
Babylon Bee is the definitive source of fake news you can trust.babylonbee.com
Is this fake news or not. The article says "fake news", or is that a lie and it is really not fake news?