Judicial Coup
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Dpic and his lib wet dreams of revenge. You are advocating and dreaming of what you accuse Trump of. What a joke.
An AG should not be acting as a president's personal attorney nor should they take direct orders or outright lie about things like the Texas gerrymandering map. In short, they are the chief law enforcement officer of the US government and they give the president advice but don't take orders. This hag has destroyed the credibility of the Justice Dept. and she'll get what she deserves when she leaves office.
Incorrect. Quit being so shamelessly partisan and tribal dpic.
So the judge who wrote for the majority of the three-person panel challenging Texas' redistricted map didn't give the dissenting judge time to review the opinion, nor did he take the time to review the dissent before issuing said opinion.
Judge Smith, dissenting, calls this "the most outrageous conduct by a judge that I have ever encountered in a case in which I have been involved" in his 37 years on the federal bench.
You're pretending like this isn't the most corrupt administration in history and it's not remotely close. Just blatant, in your face incompetence and corruption.
I will name a few quickly. George Bush Jr and Sr, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. You are worshiping the deep state machine that aims to bankrupt America and turn our nation into a socialist hell hole. Think logically at all times.
Oh what a fun game, I'll ask who's worse than Stalin and you'll say Mr Rogers!
Alt National Park Service
"Good news! Judge James E. Boasberg just issued a serious warning to the Justice Department, signaling that he may open a formal contempt investigation into whether the Trump administration violated his order to stop deportation flights of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador back in March.
This shift comes months after a major whistle-blower disclosure and we’re now finally seeing why the judge is acting.
A former DOJ attorney, Erez Reuveni, filed a protected whistle-blower complaint in late June. In it, he alleged that senior officials under Trump pressured government lawyers to ignore Judge Boasberg’s restraining order and let the flights continue anyway. According to the complaint, officials were even told in an internal meeting to effectively “tell the courts F-you” if the judge’s order interfered with the administration’s plans. Reuveni also claimed that at least two flights went forward after the court said they needed to be turned around, and that he was discouraged from documenting internal discussions that could prove what happened. He was later fired after refusing to sign what he believed was a misleading government filing.
So why did the judge wait until now to act?
Courts don’t launch contempt proceedings based on a news article or a whistle-blower allegation alone. Judge Boasberg had to wait for the Justice Department to file its official responses, provide documentation, and explain whether they followed his March order. The government delayed, gave incomplete answers, and offered shifting justifications, which slowed everything down. Over the last few weeks, however, DOJ filings began contradicting earlier statements lining up with what the whistle-blower had originally alleged.
Only once the record became clear that flights may have proceeded despite his order, and that DOJ may not have been fully truthful about it did Judge Boasberg have the legal grounds to take the next step.
That’s why everything is coming together now: the whistle-blower complaint provided the early warning, but the judge couldn’t act until the evidence, filings, and contradictions were solid enough to justify a contempt inquiry. Now they are."
"Good news! Judge James E. Boasberg just issued a serious warning to the Justice Department, signaling that he may open a formal contempt investigation into whether the Trump administration violated his order to stop deportation flights of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador back in March.
This shift comes months after a major whistle-blower disclosure and we’re now finally seeing why the judge is acting.
A former DOJ attorney, Erez Reuveni, filed a protected whistle-blower complaint in late June. In it, he alleged that senior officials under Trump pressured government lawyers to ignore Judge Boasberg’s restraining order and let the flights continue anyway. According to the complaint, officials were even told in an internal meeting to effectively “tell the courts F-you” if the judge’s order interfered with the administration’s plans. Reuveni also claimed that at least two flights went forward after the court said they needed to be turned around, and that he was discouraged from documenting internal discussions that could prove what happened. He was later fired after refusing to sign what he believed was a misleading government filing.
So why did the judge wait until now to act?
Courts don’t launch contempt proceedings based on a news article or a whistle-blower allegation alone. Judge Boasberg had to wait for the Justice Department to file its official responses, provide documentation, and explain whether they followed his March order. The government delayed, gave incomplete answers, and offered shifting justifications, which slowed everything down. Over the last few weeks, however, DOJ filings began contradicting earlier statements lining up with what the whistle-blower had originally alleged.
Only once the record became clear that flights may have proceeded despite his order, and that DOJ may not have been fully truthful about it did Judge Boasberg have the legal grounds to take the next step.
That’s why everything is coming together now: the whistle-blower complaint provided the early warning, but the judge couldn’t act until the evidence, filings, and contradictions were solid enough to justify a contempt inquiry. Now they are."
I guarantee @TigerGrowls thinks Mr. Rogers was worse for society than Stalin
And you and the loony libs cannot prove one tiny bit of this charge. Your lib brains shape reality to agree with your tds. For instance you think Joe and the Biden clan are virtuous and pure as wind driven snow while multi billionaire Trump is desperate for money. Stuff like this is why I say we have two large groups living in different realities from the other where we cannot agree even on basic facts.
Quiet piggy!
You're in a smaller group, a shrinking one, that won't benefit a lick from this shady relationship with the Bone Saw murderers.