Didn't see anyone mention this yet and I almost missed it, but its written about at the bottom of the UK/Cal article linked at the top.
Apparently Katz doesn't think Sidney plays for at least a few more weeks at minimum, guess he knows something Sidney doesn't. Talks about a dispute over the statement of facts and the process that is upcoming now that we don't agree with what the NCAA has presented.
I didn't realize there was a dispute, seemed the consensus on this board was that MSU would accept the statement of facts, guess not.
My hope is we get him cleared to play for next year, sure could use him in the post.
</p>
Apparently Katz doesn't think Sidney plays for at least a few more weeks at minimum, guess he knows something Sidney doesn't. Talks about a dispute over the statement of facts and the process that is upcoming now that we don't agree with what the NCAA has presented.
I didn't realize there was a dispute, seemed the consensus on this board was that MSU would accept the statement of facts, guess not.
My hope is we get him cleared to play for next year, sure could use him in the post.
</p>