Toggle sidebar

Letitia James

B

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,157
4,179
113
TigerGrowls said:
FAFO.



BREAKING: Special Prosecutor Ed Martin now has the most documented mortgage fraud case in modern political history


READ THE COMPLETE ROADMAP TO CONVICTION:
➡️whitecollarfraud.com/2025/08/09/the…


Letitia James ran a 40-YEAR CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE while serving as NY's top prosecutor:


BROOKLYN (2001-2023): The Foundation
➡️ Legal status: 5-unit building (Certificate of Occupancy)
➡️ Mortgage applications: Consistently reported as 1-4 units
➡️ 10+ false statements to federal lenders over 20 years
➡️2011: Defrauded federal HAMP program with handwritten document alterations
➡️ NYC Dept of Buildings CONFIRMS: "CO on file for MULTIPLE DWELLING" (5 units)


VIRGINIA (2023): The Smoking Gun
➡️Aug 2: "This property WILL NOT be my primary residence. I WILL NEVER BE A VIRGINIA RESIDENT"
➡️ Aug 17: Signs sworn declaration: "I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence"
➡️ WITNESSED BY HER OWN AG STAFF who put their legal reputations on the document
➡️ THE ULTIMATE HYPOCRISY: Oct 2, 2023: James launches Trump fraud trial—just 45 days after her own false sworn declaration


NY STATE DISCLOSURE VIOLATIONS: The Shell Game
➡️Reports mortgages that DON'T EXIST (Freedom, National Mortgage)
➡️Hides mortgages that DO EXIST (OVM Financial, Citibank HELOC)
➡️Sterling Street property: COMPLETELY OMITTED from state filings
➡️Filed under penalty of perjury - multiple felony violations


TOTAL RICO ENTERPRISE BENEFITS: $10.3+ MILLION
➡️ Phase 1: $300K+ in fraudulent loan benefits
➡️Phase 2: Used AG position to avoid accountability
➡️Phase 3: $10M taxpayer-funded defense while under federal investigation


Her own lawyer accidentally confirmed the fraud to DOJ.


Federal prosecutors now have:
✅ Written confession
✅ Government witnesses
✅ 40-year criminal pattern
✅ Defense attorney admissions


18 U.S.C. § 1014: The crime was complete the moment she signed that false declaration.


The prosecutor who built her career on "no one is above the law" is about to discover she was right.


To the American People: For someone who built her career on the principle that no one is above the law, Letitia James is about to discover just how right she was. The evidence speaks for itself. James's lies speak volumes. Justice demands prosecution.


The federal crimes are documented. The enterprise is established. The pattern is undeniable. Conviction is inevitable.


#LetitiaJames #MortgageFraud #SpecialProsecutor #NoOneAboveTheLaw #RICO
Click to expand...

I don't know about all those things but I think she's clearly guilty. I also think that the government doesn't usually pursue these things so aggressively.

  • Is The Trump DOJ doing this out of revenge? I don't think there's any doubt.
  • Is she guilty? Absolutely!
  • Does she deserve to be singled out? Yes. Her campaign was centered on finding something on Trump. She didn't know what. The Manhattan DA wouldn't even take these cases. So IMO she deserves what she gets.
  • What will her penalty be? My guess is that she'll be found guilty but the penalty will be relatively light. She'll have a liberal judge.
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,894
21,122
113
baltimorened said:
well, the first one is that this prosecution is politically motivated....remember it was James that ran her campaign on the mantra of getting/bankrupting Donald Trump. Trump used the same politically motivated argument (both are probably right). There are others, but I do'n have time now..off to church
Click to expand...
The POTUS should be above political prosecutions with flimsy evidence by demanding his lapdog AG prosecute his enemies NOW. A decent human being would be thankful that he was still re-elected despite his smorgasbord of treasonous crimes, be contrite and remorseful, not WORSE than he was before.
 
P

PalmettoTiger1

Heisman
Jan 24, 2009
12,421
12,205
113
dpic73 said:
The POTUS should be above political prosecutions with flimsy evidence by demanding his lapdog AG prosecute his enemies NOW. A decent human being would be thankful that he was still re-elected despite his smorgasbord of treasonous crimes, be contrite and remorseful, not WORSE than he was before.
Click to expand...

Hey @dpic73 why don’t you follow Neds lead and go to church

You might teach or preach the folks in the church something LOL
 
T

TICrack

All-American
Jul 1, 2013
3,047
7,610
113
Clemblack said:
I predict you'll wake up a fahg in the morning. let us know if I'm right.
Click to expand...
GIF by Quizizz
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,894
21,122
113
TigerGrowls said:
She's guilty by the law. Not sure what the hold up is other than fraud by the court to include cooked jury.
Click to expand...
If she's guilty, Trump's guilty so keep that in mind for later and be careful what you wish for ;-)

www.yahoo.com

Trump Allegedly Committed Same ‘Mortgage Fraud’ His Admin Prosecuted Letitia James For: Report

President Donald Trump is guilty under his own standards of mortgage fraud for claiming more than one primary residence, ProPublica reported Monday.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73 and UrHuckleberry
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
Hearing details now. The swamp protecting its own.



Lindsey Halligan presented the Letitia James case to a grand jury.

They indicted Letitia James.

Judge Currie ruled her appointment invalid. The indictment was dismissed.

The same career prosecutor then presented to two different grand juries - Norfolk and Alexandria.

Both declined to indict.

Same evidence. One prosecutor got an indictment. Another got nothing.

Twice.

The “inexperienced” prosecutor succeeded. The career prosecutor failed.

What was presented differently? What was the tone and demeanor of the prosecutor?

I can’t wait for Democrats to subpoena me. I’ll show up with 40 years of documented fraud and answer every question under oath.

Will Letitia James?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,247
18,803
113
TigerGrowls said:
In the end.....

Click to expand...


So is the contention that multiple grand juries are made up full of deep state operatives?

You think that’s more likely than actual prosecutors understanding they can’t mislead the jury and that they could lose their licenses with how much scrutiny that case will be under?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,247
18,803
113
TigerGrowls said:
Hearing details now. The swamp protecting its own.



Lindsey Halligan presented the Letitia James case to a grand jury.

They indicted Letitia James.

Judge Currie ruled her appointment invalid. The indictment was dismissed.

The same career prosecutor then presented to two different grand juries - Norfolk and Alexandria.

Both declined to indict.

Same evidence. One prosecutor got an indictment. Another got nothing.

Twice.

The “inexperienced” prosecutor succeeded. The career prosecutor failed.

What was presented differently? What was the tone and demeanor of the prosecutor?

I can’t wait for Democrats to subpoena me. I’ll show up with 40 years of documented fraud and answer every question under oath.

Will Letitia James?
Click to expand...

Ah so the contention is that this new prosecutor has less experience than Halligan?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,894
21,122
113
TigerGrowls said:
Hearing details now. The swamp protecting its own.



Lindsey Halligan presented the Letitia James case to a grand jury.

They indicted Letitia James.

Judge Currie ruled her appointment invalid. The indictment was dismissed.

The same career prosecutor then presented to two different grand juries - Norfolk and Alexandria.

Both declined to indict.

Same evidence. One prosecutor got an indictment. Another got nothing.

Twice.

The “inexperienced” prosecutor succeeded. The career prosecutor failed.

What was presented differently? What was the tone and demeanor of the prosecutor?

I can’t wait for Democrats to subpoena me. I’ll show up with 40 years of documented fraud and answer every question under oath.

Will Letitia James?
Click to expand...

Why can't you just accept that it was a ******** case that never should have been brought because there actually was no case? Demanding that the DOJ bring lawsuits against people you don't like, only because you don't like them, is no way to run a justice department. They should have listened to the original US attorney who was fired(or resigned) because he said there was no there there and you could have avoided this humiliation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
UrHuckleberry said:
So is the contention that multiple grand juries are made up full of deep state operatives?

You think that’s more likely than actual prosecutors understanding they can’t mislead the jury and that they could lose their licenses with how much scrutiny that case will be under?
Click to expand...
Read what occurred. They put a guy that only works civil cases and hadn't presented to a grand jury in over 10 years. I also know from following the j6 cases that they can and do load juries with people of their choosing up in the DC general area. These are not good people. The system is rigged.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing and yoshi121374
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,247
18,803
113
TigerGrowls said:
Read what occurred. They put a guy that only works civil cases and hadn't presented to a grand jury in over 10 years. I also know from following the j6 cases that they can and do load juries with people of their choosing up in the DC general area. These are not good people. The system is rigged.
Click to expand...
Grand Jury's don't get their jury's with people selected by both sides like a criminal case, James legal team is not involved in the process whatsoever. And the prosecutor had more experience than Halligan. And why is it that they couldn't get a more qualified prosecutor to file it before a grand jury? You should consider the possibility that it is because the case holds no merit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kudzuking, PawPride, yoshi121374 and 1 other person
yoshi121374

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,805
21,761
113
TigerGrowls said:
Read what occurred. They put a guy that only works civil cases and hadn't presented to a grand jury in over 10 years. I also know from following the j6 cases that they can and do load juries with people of their choosing up in the DC general area. These are not good people. The system is rigged.
Click to expand...

UrHuckleberry said:
Grand Jury's don't get their jury's with people selected by both sides like a criminal case, James legal team is not involved in the process whatsoever. And the prosecutor had more experience than Halligan. And why is it that they couldn't get a more qualified prosecutor to file it before a grand jury? You should consider the possibility that it is because the case holds no merit.
Click to expand...

It is ridiculously easy to get an indictment from a Grand Jury. The burden of proof is extremely low. For a Grand Jury to refuse twice to indict is basically unheard of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawPride, dpic73 and UrHuckleberry
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
yoshi121374 said:
It is ridiculously easy to get an indictment from a Grand Jury. The burden of proof is extremely low. For a Grand Jury to refuse twice to indict is basically unheard of.
Click to expand...
This is a deep state fix. DOJ and judiciary still has plenty of anti trump players.
 
yoshi121374

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,805
21,761
113
TigerGrowls said:
Im serious. Sorry it doesn't meet professor yoshi standards.
Click to expand...

If you ever had the silghtest bit of proof of your claims that the whole world is in some great conspiracy against Trump that only you and the other MAGAS understand and see....

Maybe then I'd respect your thoughts. You've been wrong every single time.
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
yoshi121374 said:
When have you been right? I might have missed it in the multitude of conspiracies you have shared over the years.

What's an example of one you've been right about?
Click to expand...
Well one big one is that Trump won in 24.....duh. Now tell me one you have been right on that i have no choice but to agree with.
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,894
21,122
113
TigerGrowls said:
Well one big one is that Trump won in 24.....duh. Now tell me one you have been right on that i have no choice but to agree with.
Click to expand...
Trump winning in 24 was a grand conspiracy that you were right about? Huh?
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
dpic73 said:
Trump winning in 24 was a grand conspiracy that you were right about? Huh?
Click to expand...
It was any prediction. For instance i correctly also predicted that you, @yoshi121374 and other libs would absolutely lose it also after Trump won with TDS on steroids basically and we know i got that one right.

Great replacement theory by dems is another one I called correctly. I have more and mass election fraud will be proven also in the fairly near future. You are welcome guys. Just call me Tigernostris.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom