Libs are not smart

CUTiger1977

Member
Jan 21, 2008
9,264
6,646
38
Triggered. :D :cool::p:);)
iu
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,388
1,813
113
You sure do post a bunch of BS but never a link, why is that? Are you concerned your sources might be shady? FYI - they are
lol - your sources are Sharp as a Tack and White Dudes for Harris.

We all hope she runs again, but we ALL know it will never happen. Because she is a terrible, terrible candidate. Totally unqualified. And stupid. All of which I told you when she was appointed as a candidate the first time.

Who do you think Obama should appoint t as the next candidate? Not that your opinion will matter. You will get who you are told and you will like it . That’s how it works over there I guess.
 

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
21,982
1,395
113
lol - your sources are Sharp as a Tack and White Dudes for Harris.

We all hope she runs again, but we ALL know it will never happen. Because she is a terrible, terrible candidate. Totally unqualified. And stupid. All of which I told you when she was appointed as a candidate the first time.

Who do you think Obama should appoint t as the next candidate? Not that your opinion will matter. You will get who you are told and you will like it . That’s how it works over there I guess.
Thanks for the link that proves this "BREAKING" news piglet
 

scotchtiger

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2005
134,015
9,106
113


You will see the dems run from a lot of the nonsense they've supported the last 4 years. Look no further than Kamala pivoting bigly on many issues this summer once the dem think tanks told her what policies were most electable. Unfortunately, their previous positions are often on tape.

That's why they pretty much have to lean on new blood in 2028. They can't be tethered to the absolute dogshit policies that the current version of the dem party has supported. They will pivot and try to find someone new who hopefully hasn't supported their policies on camera.
 

WapPride

New member
Mar 17, 2021
3,977
0
0
You will see the dems run from a lot of the nonsense they've supported the last 4 years. Look no further than Kamala pivoting bigly on many issues this summer once the dem think tanks told her what policies were most electable. Unfortunately, their previous positions are often on tape.

That's why they pretty much have to lean on new blood in 2028. They can't be tethered to the absolute dogshit policies that the current version of the dem party has supported. They will pivot and try to find someone new who hopefully hasn't supported their policies on camera.
Is this similar to how the pubs all voted against/railed against infrastructure/healthcare initiatives passed by dems and then go out and champion those bills/funding to their constituents?
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,388
1,813
113
I’d be sour, depressed, and humiliated too if the tried to run those two clowns for my party.
 

WapPride

New member
Mar 17, 2021
3,977
0
0
A speculative **** from the Chris Plante show is your proof? Sounds like a bunch of hogwash pork chop. This is why you fail.
I, too, believe the tweets of a NewsMax host and conservative radio FM talk show host who's trying to gin up engagement.
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,388
1,813
113
A speculative **** from the Chris Plante show is your proof? Sounds like a bunch of hogwash pork chop. This is why you fail.
Why I fail? Trump won.

Tesla and SpaceX are at all time highs. I’m taking a W whether you like it or not!
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,547
8,641
113

yeah learning from the greatest universities in the world will make you like North Korea.

Knowledge is ignorance
War is peace etc etc.

I know you are the thirstiest person I've ever encountered on TI, but man, you guys are just wild.
 

SGTiger

Active member
Jul 10, 2008
46,288
7,311
83
Apparently liberalism is some kind of mental disorder according to Arthur Brook's (professor at far left Harvard) interpretation of the data. Just need to follow the science.