LOCKED-Thanks Thad!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 11, 2012
410
0
0
Of the 4 issues he chose to "discuss," he would have no power over 2 of them if he got to vote 101 times.

He would know that if he actually read the Constitution or the 200 ******* years of jurisprudence regarding the same.
 

HammerOfTheDogs

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
10,771
1,571
113
Here in Texas, George P. Bush (W's nephew and Poppy's grandson) is running for Land Commissioner. He promised to fight back against Obama and the Liberal Bureaucrats in Washington.
 

Machiavelli

Redshirt
Mar 16, 2013
109
0
0
Thad messed it up and Chris will fix it. Real issue, who's better Chris or Greg? Phil could send himself.
 

horshack.sixpack

All-American
Oct 30, 2012
11,374
8,284
113
Name a high level politician who isn't a puppet. The only distinction here is that he may not be fit to choose who he allows to be the puppeteer, but otherwise it isn't much different than everyone else in DC. They are all beholding to someone, vote party line and do whatever it takes to stay in office.
 

BeardoMSU

Redshirt
Jul 9, 2013
788
0
0
Of the 4 issues he chose to "discuss," he would have no power over 2 of them if he got to vote 101 times.

He would know that if he actually read the Constitution or the 200 ******* years of jurisprudence regarding the same.

Eggzactly!

He must know how stupid the MS voting base is. You are either "pro prayer in schools", or you're the Devil. You're either "pro Second Amendment" or you're Obama...Oh snap, I need to vote for that guy!!!

What does that even mean? Just about every person I know is "pro 2nd Amendment", they just differ in their views on the extent of gun-control. And despite what you hear in your Sunday school gossip circle, your children can pray in schools, there are just no school sponsored prayers.
We live in a binary world, apparently.
 

ckDOG

All-American
Dec 11, 2007
10,026
5,882
113
Say what you want about the Bush family...

...but they have politics figured out. George P is half Mexican. Apologies to Mrs. Jeb for the implication, as I'm sure she's a wonderful lady, but a Mexican Bush is going to go a long way in keeping the political dynasty alive as our demographics shift.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
You folks who are blasting Cochran and Barbour didn't live down here on the coast and get devastated like we did with Katrina . Had we not had Cochran and Barbour we would have never rebuilt. Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it and Mississippi needs all it can get from Washington. Sorry that bothers some of you but go ahead and let the damn Democrats get control of everything and see how long this country survives. Government is way too big but as long as it is, we better get our share or we will dry up.
 

BeardoMSU

Redshirt
Jul 9, 2013
788
0
0
You folks who are blasting Cochran and Barbour didn't live down here on the coast and get devastated like we did with Katrina . Had we not had Cochran and Barbour we would have never rebuilt.

I agree with this part, not so much the rest. But you're right, without them, we'd be ******. Luckily, we on the coast have the esteemed Palazzo representing us***** - the same guy who voted not to send hurricane aid to New York...what a complete tool.
 
Last edited:

MStateFan22

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2010
664
0
0
Well the first thing that comes to mind is the power to vote on constitutional amendments. That pretty much covers all 4. Thanks for playing.
 

BeardoMSU

Redshirt
Jul 9, 2013
788
0
0
Well the first thing that comes to mind is the power to vote on constitutional amendments. That pretty much covers all 4. Thanks for playing.

What are you talking about? Constitutional amendments? The topics that his "views" would address have already been addressed at length by state and federal Supreme Courts. What is your boy McDaniel gonna do about putting "prayer back in public school"? Btw....I doubt very much that was a pubic school classroom he was in at the start of that ad. Ok, so the 2nd Amendment? What's he gonna do to uphold that? Shoot down provisions for extended background checks? Does that make someone more "pro 2nd amendment"?
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,932
2,593
113
Well the first thing that comes to mind is the power to vote on constitutional amendments. That pretty much covers all 4. Thanks for playing.

Constitutional amendments are extremely hard to pass. Gotta have 2/3rds in both houses (so bipartisan support) and then 38 state legislatures (so the 13 most Republican or most Democratic states can join up and block something, like the ERA).

Even if a constitutional amendment about school prayer ever came to the floor (pretty unlikely), there's no way in hell it would ever get close to passing Congress, much less 38 states, so there's no point in basing your vote on how a candidate would vote on some hypothetical constitutional amendment like that.
 

Wicked Pissah

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
1,437
0
0
So the state that is the poorest, dumbest and needs aid the most, wants to vote out a guy that can actually HELP the state for a guy that gives dumbass sound bites on things he cant do and will actually hurt the state?

Maybe I should run for office in MS. I watched that commercial and thought "surely nobody is dumb enough to think this is real". I was wrong.

Wicked 2020
God
Guns
jesus
Pro life
'Merica
 

EAVdog

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2010
2,336
0
36
Our current president campaigned on

a. Hope

b. Change

He won twice, and could possibly win again regardless being absolutely horrible. Laugh all you want but those SOBs know what they are doing with their messaging.
 

BeardoMSU

Redshirt
Jul 9, 2013
788
0
0
Our current president campaigned on

a. Hope

b. Change

He won twice, and could possibly win again regardless being absolutely horrible. Laugh all you want but those SOBs know what they are doing with their messaging.

He also ran on A) Healthcare, and B) Getting us out of 2 wars in the Middle East.
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,870
6,569
113
Well it has become painfully obvious Thad shouldn`t have run and also obvious that he can`t serve (effectively) a six year term if he were to get elected. My question is did he insist on running himself or did he get asked by the "establishment republicans" to run because he had the best chance to win and let the Gov. appoint an "establishment" candidate to replace him at retirement until the ensuing special election ?
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,870
6,569
113
Speaking of healthcare where is my $2500 dollars he told me I was going to save on my insurance ?
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
guys, dont shoot the messenger, im just telling you what she told me...the main point being he is avoiding the public eye at all costs to avoid being exposed. full disclosure, i didnt vote for either one...mostly because every time i register to vote i get selected for jury duty once every year or so...as a student, i have to get hassled to get out of duty because they interfere with classes. with threat of jail time, i dont like being in that situation as my full time hinds county residency is iffy at best considering i am all over the state much of the time. its better just to avoid it all together until i settle down somewhere.

i must admit that i didnt know how all that all works, that is why i said it may not be plausible. at one time i was current on these types of things, but politics have been on my back burner for some time now. i had to look it up and found the below information. maybe manipulating a special election in regard to its timing would effectively serve the purpose she was referring to or having a house member overtake a seat and having a clear incumbent in the house member's district would have the same effect....i have no idea, nor do i really care. i am far too jaded to really care that much about politics anymore. my general philosophy is that democracy, in theory, is a good one, however, in reality, people are far too stupid to be trusted. case in point, 37% of americans can't even identify the united states on a world map. talk about scary....WE THE PEOPLE cannot be trusted.


Members of Congress, senators and representatives, usually leave office before the end of their terms for one of five reasons: death, resignation, retirement, expulsion, and election or appointment to other government posts.
While the Constitution does not mandate a method by which vacancies in the Senate are to be handled, vacancies can be filled almost immediately by the governor of the former senator's state. The laws of some states require the governor to call a special election to replace U.S. Senators. In states where replacements are appointed by the governor, the governor almost always appoints a member of his or her own political party. In some cases, the governor will appoint one of the state's current U.S. representatives in the House to fill the vacant Senate seat, thus creating a vacancy in the House. Vacancies in Congress also occur when a member runs for and is elected to some other political office before his or her term is over.
Since Senate vacancies can be filled so quickly and each state has two senators, it is highly unlikely that a state would ever be without representation in the Senate.
Vacancies in the House, however, take far longer to fill. The Constitution requires that member of the House be replaced only by an election held in the congressional district of the former representative.
"When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies." -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution
According to the US Constitution and state law, the governor of the state calls for a special election to replace the vacant House seat. The full election-cycle must be followed including political party nominating processes, primary elections and a general election, all held in the congressional district involved. The entire process often takes as long as from three to six months.
While a House seat is vacant, the office of the former representative remains open, its staff operating under the supervision of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. The people of the affected congressional district do not have voting representation in the House during the vacancy period. They can, however, continue to contact former representative's interim office for assistance with a limited range of services as listed below by the Clerk of the House.
 
Last edited:
Mar 6, 2013
330
1
18
... Crickets ....

Yeah, he did a great job getting this out of those two wars in the Middle East. Do you read the news? He campaigned that Al Qaeda was not in Iraq. Well, they sure are now.
 

ket7450

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
181
0
16
Yeah, President Bush was much better. Inherited a surplus and ended with a huge deficit started two endless wars, and ended his final term with the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Yeah, Obama sucks compared to that.
 
Last edited:

MStateFan22

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2010
664
0
0
Uhhh. Yea. I know. I wasn't referring to the likelihood of a constitutional amendment. The posts I responded to said that he had absolutely no power to vote for some of the views he listed. Which was incorrect.
 

Shamoan

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2013
12,466
0
0
Love.................

Fear.................

check out the testimonials of the fear survivors.
 

BeardoMSU

Redshirt
Jul 9, 2013
788
0
0
Uhhh. Yea. I know. I wasn't referring to the likelihood of a constitutional amendment. The posts I responded to said that he had absolutely no power to vote for some of the views he listed. Which was incorrect.

Doesn't mean they weren't futile (not to mention stupid)...but yeah, you were sorta right.....
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,870
6,569
113
Well you knew it would either be the "Bush" card or the "race" card. I`ll be glad when the Dems write you nimrods some new material.
 

beachbumdawg

Senior
Nov 28, 2006
2,918
705
113
Sorry that bothers some of you but go ahead and let the damn Democrats get control of everything and see how long this country survives. Government is way too big but as long as it is, we better get our share or we will dry up.

Does it really matter if I go off the cliff at 85 as opposed to going off the cliff at 55?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.