The team is different every year am I right? This team isn’t good. They shouldn’t be judged off of previous Loyola teams. I’m a big Naz guy, the 14 and 15 teams went b2b and 17 went to the title, 18 seems pretty good but the 16 version was not a good team. Sometimes it happens, Naz had 2 d1 kids move or transfer out, Loyola’s got some big injuries. These circumstances were outside of their control but we don’t have to call them good because other previous Loyola teams were.
So is the reason they're the only 3-3 team in the top 20 because of their prior years' success?