Man Made Globing Warming,

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
Bible is ******** to keep you sucking the authority’s dick like you willfully do. Keep on suckin lair. You’re a pro!

The Bible does just the opposite, it tells you that man isn’t the higher authority.
It’s why Communist nations are threatened by it, and ban or limit religion. It threatens their authority if it’s citizens believe the Govt isn’t their higher power.
You’re the one doing the slurping, and don’t even realize it.
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
114,514
0
I would like to see one of them reconcile the lack of warming in the Southern Hemisphere while still proclaiming "global warming". Global has a specific meaning, doesn't it?
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,185
148,434
113
The vast majority of the scientific world is no more qualified to give an opinion on the climate than you are. There are plenty of climate scientists who disagree with the narrative. You have merely chosen a side rather than doing any research on your own.

CO2 isn't even close to being the main driver of our climate. It just happens to be one that we can be taxed on.
Yeah, most scientist at one time believed the world was flat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC

EastKYWildcat

New member
Jan 5, 2010
15,906
728
0
What percent of climate scientists would no longer be necessary if there wasn’t the “crisis” of man made climate change?
I'm not sure how much you think people make in research. There is an astronomically higher amount of money that stands to be lost by the fossil fuel industry if our government enacted policy based on science. Practically all the money in this situation comes from those whose best interest depends on people not listening to the experts.
 

EastKYWildcat

New member
Jan 5, 2010
15,906
728
0
I'm just not sure where all the anti-science sentiment comes from? Do you guys go to the doctor? We know you're using a computer or a phone to post here. Own a car? You all think this stuff just came out of nowhere?
 

thabigbluenation

New member
Jul 19, 2012
5,310
17,357
0
The Bible does just the opposite, it tells you that man isn’t the higher authority.
It’s why Communist nations are threatened by it, and ban or limit religion. It threatens their authority if it’s citizens believe the Govt isn’t their higher power.
You’re the one doing the slurping, and don’t even realize it.

dayum. "mic drop"
 

Henogee1975

Member
Jan 31, 2017
3,960
7,729
37
Let’s suppose man is warming the earth. What are we gonna do about it? Stop using fossil fuels? You liberals gonna get rid of your cars and phones? Use only, wind, water, and solar power?Or gonna follow Al Gore’s hypocrisy and use 10 times more than the average American household?
Electric cars are powered by coal fired power plants for goodness sakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
114,514
0
I'm just not sure where all the anti-science sentiment comes from? Do you guys go to the doctor? We know you're using a computer or a phone to post here. Own a car? You all think this stuff just came out of nowhere?

It's sad when you see a lemming regurgitate the talking points of the propagandists. You have no idea what you're talking about. You just repeat what you've been told to think.

Science, real science is the exact reason why we know that man's effect on the climate is miniscule at most.

This is where you're supposed to accuse us of wanting dirty rivers and smog choked cities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Henogee1975

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
I'm not sure how much you think people make in research. There is an astronomically higher amount of money that stands to be lost by the fossil fuel industry if our government enacted policy based on science. Practically all the money in this situation comes from those whose best interest depends on people not listening to the experts.

You’re missing the point. Without a crisis there is no need for the number of climatologists we have. The amount of money they make is irrelevant, it’s their job and livelihood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC

KyFaninNC

New member
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,506
0
I'm just not sure where all the anti-science sentiment comes from? Do you guys go to the doctor? We know you're using a computer or a phone to post here. Own a car? You all think this stuff just came out of nowhere?
It does. Figures don’t lie, but, liars figure.
 

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,933
3,001
0
So there's a massive conspiracy among climatologists to fabricate data to make it appear as if human activity affects global climate so that they can expand their employment opportunities?
 

bigbluefattycat

New member
Oct 5, 2005
14,557
4,530
0
Welp there goes the neighborhood. No more fart trackers. Eat your White Castles and dump your pants for all I care. Trump gonna blow up the solar system.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5721109/Trump-administration-quietly-cancels-10m-NASA-program-tracks-key-greenhouse-gases.html

Trump administration quietly cancels $10m NASA program that tracks key greenhouse gases as part of its 'attack on climate science'
  • NASA's $10m-per-year Carbon Monitoring System (CMS) has been canceled
  • The program was designed to track greenhouse gases carbon and methane
  • A report from the journal Science called the shut down the latest move in a 'broad attack on climate science' by the White House
  • Experts say the program was integral to measuring emissions and making sure the US is complying with the Paris climate accord regulations
 

bluthruandthru

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2009
3,813
3,923
113
If you believe that CO2 levels are much higher than has ever been recorded (at least as far back as the ice cores tell us), why wouldn't you want to keep tabs on that?
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,185
148,434
113
When was that? And what scientists?
"Scientist and philosophers were one in the same back then... Belief in a flat Earth is found in mankind's oldest writings. In early Mesopotamian thought, the world was portrayed as a flat disk floating in the ocean."

This was the general thought, however, there have been those few who went against the norm and just like today they were laughed at and ostracized. I believe most go with the flow for that and monetary reasons.
 
Last edited:

KyFaninNC

New member
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,506
0
CO2 does not cause global warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere.
And without CO2 all the trees will die, then? I have asked many times here to the believers that man and CO2 is destroying our planet what do you propose we do about it? Name one feasible thing we can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

KyFaninNC

New member
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,506
0
CO2 does not cause global warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere.
And without CO2 all the trees will die, then? I have asked many times here to the believers that man and CO2 is destroying our planet what do you propose we do about it? Name one feasible thing we can do.
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,185
148,434
113
And without CO2 all the trees will die, then? I have asked many times here to the believers that man and CO2 is destroying our planet what do you propose we do about it? Name one feasible thing we can do.
Get rid of all liberals and problem solved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC

bluthruandthru

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2009
3,813
3,923
113
I never said CO2 causes global warming nor did I say it needs to be lowered to levels that would kill trees. (Great arguement, btw)

I asked why you wouldn't want to keep an eye on something that has spiked so precipitously in recent decades.
 
Last edited:

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,933
3,001
0
"Scientist and philosophers were one in the same back then... Belief in a flat Earth is found in mankind's oldest writings. In early Mesopotamian thought, the world was portrayed as a flat disk floating in the ocean."

This was the general thought, however, there have been those few who went against the norm and just like today they were laughed at and ostracized. I believe most go with the flow for that and monetary reasons.

From where did you get that quote? You're talking so far back in time that it's disingenuous to characterize scientists and philosophers as one in the same. They weren't scientists by any modern definition. 'Early Mesopotamian thought' must mean more than 800 years B.C.

The Greeks believed the earth was round several hundred years B.C. And they even approximated its size to an impressive degree of accuracy by ca. 200 B.C.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy#Hellenic_world
 

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,933
3,001
0
CO2 does not cause global warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere.

You should publish this in a climatology journal. Don't forget to put "Case closed" at then end, though, to really drive home the point.
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,185
148,434
113
From where did you get that quote? You're talking so far back in time that it's disingenuous to characterize scientists and philosophers as one in the same. They weren't scientists by any modern definition. 'Early Mesopotamian thought' must mean more than 800 years B.C.

The Greeks believed the earth was round several hundred years B.C. And they even approximated its size to an impressive degree of accuracy by ca. 200 B.C.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy#Hellenic_world
I guess you missed the point where I said at one time. However, the point is still valid. Not surprised you do not get though, you are one of the brainwashed and will can not see the truth.
 

ScrewDuke1

Well-known member
Jul 29, 2016
40,381
148,510
113
People still really believe in man made global warming? It was snowing here in the middle of f*****g April and one of the all time coldest Aprils where I live.
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
114,514
0
You should publish this in a climatology journal. Don't forget to put "Case closed" at then end, though, to really drive home the point.
Climatologists already know that info.

Do some research and I'm sure you'll find that the people calling it "settled science" will tell you that they are pretty sure that human activity leads to an increase in global temperatures. Think about that. Why do they say they are pretty sure, or fairly confident? Don't those words tell you anything?
 

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,933
3,001
0
I guess you missed the point where I said at one time. However, the point is still valid. Not surprised you do not get though, you are one of the brainwashed and will can not see the truth.

What an incredibly stupid response. No, I didn't miss the point. But saying "at one time" is a totally vague cop-out. "At one time," humans probably didn't understand how babies were made. So what? Scientists have known the earth was round for a good 2500 years now.

As for me being brainwashed, that's a telling statement. I guess in your world, education = brainwashing. In that case, yes, call me brainwashed. It beats suffering from Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
 

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,933
3,001
0
People still really believe in man made global warming? It was snowing here in the middle of f*****g April and one of the all time coldest Aprils where I live.

I'm shocked that you think local weather disproves global warming. Shocked, I tells ya.
 

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,933
3,001
0
Climatologists already know that info.

Do some research and I'm sure you'll find that the people calling it "settled science" will tell you that they are pretty sure that human activity leads to an increase in global temperatures. Think about that. Why do they say they are pretty sure, or fairly confident? Don't those words tell you anything?

Yes, they tell me a lot. They tell me that science likes to be accurate and precise in its language. They are indeed "pretty sure" and "fairly confident," based on the data they've compiled and the analysis of said data.

That's precisely how science works. Just because they can't say with 100% certainty doesn't negate the overwhelming likelihood that they are correct.