Bible is ******** to keep you sucking the authority’s dick like you willfully do. Keep on suckin lair. You’re a pro!
What authority? Who is this authority?
Bible is ******** to keep you sucking the authority’s dick like you willfully do. Keep on suckin lair. You’re a pro!
Bible is ******** to keep you sucking the authority’s dick like you willfully do. Keep on suckin lair. You’re a pro!
What authority? Who is this authority?
Your homophobia is disgusting.Bible is ******** to keep you sucking the authority’s dick like you willfully do. Keep on suckin lair. You’re a pro!
Why is that not realistic?We're looking for realistic solutions.
You simply can not make these people understand it is about money, nothing more.What percent of climate scientists would no longer be necessary if there wasn’t the “crisis” of man made climate change?
Yeah, most scientist at one time believed the world was flat.The vast majority of the scientific world is no more qualified to give an opinion on the climate than you are. There are plenty of climate scientists who disagree with the narrative. You have merely chosen a side rather than doing any research on your own.
CO2 isn't even close to being the main driver of our climate. It just happens to be one that we can be taxed on.
I'm not sure how much you think people make in research. There is an astronomically higher amount of money that stands to be lost by the fossil fuel industry if our government enacted policy based on science. Practically all the money in this situation comes from those whose best interest depends on people not listening to the experts.What percent of climate scientists would no longer be necessary if there wasn’t the “crisis” of man made climate change?
The Bible does just the opposite, it tells you that man isn’t the higher authority.
It’s why Communist nations are threatened by it, and ban or limit religion. It threatens their authority if it’s citizens believe the Govt isn’t their higher power.
You’re the one doing the slurping, and don’t even realize it.
I'm just not sure where all the anti-science sentiment comes from? Do you guys go to the doctor? We know you're using a computer or a phone to post here. Own a car? You all think this stuff just came out of nowhere?
Yeah, most scientist at one time believed the world was flat.
Yup. I'm a huge fan of science and I think it's important to keep learning and trying to figure out how everything works. But to pretend that scientist have all the answers is conceited and takes just as much faith as someone who is religious.Yeah, most scientist at one time believed the world was flat.
I'm not sure how much you think people make in research. There is an astronomically higher amount of money that stands to be lost by the fossil fuel industry if our government enacted policy based on science. Practically all the money in this situation comes from those whose best interest depends on people not listening to the experts.
It does. Figures don’t lie, but, liars figure.I'm just not sure where all the anti-science sentiment comes from? Do you guys go to the doctor? We know you're using a computer or a phone to post here. Own a car? You all think this stuff just came out of nowhere?
"Scientist and philosophers were one in the same back then... Belief in a flat Earth is found in mankind's oldest writings. In early Mesopotamian thought, the world was portrayed as a flat disk floating in the ocean."When was that? And what scientists?
And without CO2 all the trees will die, then? I have asked many times here to the believers that man and CO2 is destroying our planet what do you propose we do about it? Name one feasible thing we can do.CO2 does not cause global warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere.
And without CO2 all the trees will die, then? I have asked many times here to the believers that man and CO2 is destroying our planet what do you propose we do about it? Name one feasible thing we can do.CO2 does not cause global warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere.
Get rid of all liberals and problem solved.And without CO2 all the trees will die, then? I have asked many times here to the believers that man and CO2 is destroying our planet what do you propose we do about it? Name one feasible thing we can do.
"Scientist and philosophers were one in the same back then... Belief in a flat Earth is found in mankind's oldest writings. In early Mesopotamian thought, the world was portrayed as a flat disk floating in the ocean."
This was the general thought, however, there have been those few who went against the norm and just like today they were laughed at and ostracized. I believe most go with the flow for that and monetary reasons.
CO2 does not cause global warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere.
I guess you missed the point where I said at one time. However, the point is still valid. Not surprised you do not get though, you are one of the brainwashed and will can not see the truth.From where did you get that quote? You're talking so far back in time that it's disingenuous to characterize scientists and philosophers as one in the same. They weren't scientists by any modern definition. 'Early Mesopotamian thought' must mean more than 800 years B.C.
The Greeks believed the earth was round several hundred years B.C. And they even approximated its size to an impressive degree of accuracy by ca. 200 B.C.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy#Hellenic_world
Climatologists already know that info.You should publish this in a climatology journal. Don't forget to put "Case closed" at then end, though, to really drive home the point.
I guess you missed the point where I said at one time. However, the point is still valid. Not surprised you do not get though, you are one of the brainwashed and will can not see the truth.
People still really believe in man made global warming? It was snowing here in the middle of f*****g April and one of the all time coldest Aprils where I live.
Climatologists already know that info.
Do some research and I'm sure you'll find that the people calling it "settled science" will tell you that they are pretty sure that human activity leads to an increase in global temperatures. Think about that. Why do they say they are pretty sure, or fairly confident? Don't those words tell you anything?
No doubt man, no graphs yet?Yeah...
Meh, these threads aren’t gonna achieve the same gusto of days gone by wi5hout posters like Z, gracetoyou et al