Matt Jones

Will you vote for Matt Jones against Mitch Mcconnell??


Results are only viewable after voting.

bigsmoothie

New member
Sep 7, 2004
11,161
8,850
0
I can't argue with that. It is also a very comical thread. A joke of a radio personality pretending he is going to be a Progressive U.S. Senator from Kentucky. I don't think so. He might want to move to New York permanently to be with his girl friend and run for office up there. He could do KSR from a booth in Central Park.
I bet your tired *** listens everyday.
 

bigsmoothie

New member
Sep 7, 2004
11,161
8,850
0
So Jones is hyping a non-serious book of comedy about Mitch M. that he hasn't yet written (actually that his writer hasn't yet written) using a senate campaign that he hasn't yet entered to help stir interest.

He plans to get his material by eventually visiting each Kentucky county and gathering anecdotes. He has no plans to discuss his position on policy until after his book is published and he has successfully obtained grass roots support to enter the race. Am I missing anything?

Meanwhile, the election is only about 13 months away.

Does anybody know anything about his position on policy/issues, except that he's a UK fan boy, hates UofL, only superficially understands football, and loves to talk down to callers that he deems beneath his intelligence in his juvenile tone? He's not allowed by his iHeart bosses to discuss it. Does he have a political site for people to find this info?

What a lame, half assed, empty, incompetent, noncommittal proposition. It's not even worthy of a thread. It's a freaking joke. But so is Jones.
You seem to know a lot about him.
 

JamesIII

Active member
Oct 21, 2003
3,321
3,383
62
Why should Republicans have to answer to made up leftist BS that only validates their destructive positions? Isims and phobias are the livelihood of the democrat party these days. They use these claims to divide, inflame, and gain votes from weak minded snowflakes who love the victim mentality.

These leftist scumbag politicians have set race relations back 50 years or more just to secure a voting base. It's disgusting. The supply of racism in 2019 is greatly below the demand. Reference the numerous racism hoaxes, most (of course) not reported by the leftist MSM.

The party's only other agenda items are socialism, free **** giveaways, open borders, more free **** for illegals, lawlessness, and insane Green New Deal government wealth redistribution. It's so stupid it would be funny if they weren't seriously pushing it (including leading presidential candidates).

The Republicans have their share of globalists out to make a buck, but the democrat party is overwhelmingly anti-American. They are not fit to lead. Electing any democrat is a vote in support of the party's insanity.

If Matt Jones wants to represent the people of Kentucky, he should disassociate himself with that lunatic party. I wouldn't elect a democrat dog catcher. They'd probably give your dog a sex change and teach him to identify as a cat and claim to be a victim of some made up abuse.

Do you need help?
 

thabigbluenation

New member
Jul 19, 2012
5,310
17,357
0
lol at the blatant ignorance of fact

here is a challenge. side by side, list the principles of socialism next to fascism. you are not allowed to use terms like right wing or left wing because your feeble mind doesn't know the difference between european parliamentary govt and our version of western capitalism. just list the principles regarding the markets, business, health care, how the govt sees it's role in economic principles, oh and the second amendment thing we have.

if you dare to accept, list these principles between socialism and fascism and how they relate?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bigsmoothie

New member
Sep 7, 2004
11,161
8,850
0
You're easily impressed. It seems to me there's not a lot of character depth there to know. I quit listening to him about 4 years ago. Got bored with his sophomoric act. The rest of my post came from a newspaper article.
So you read newspaper articles. Ok papaw. Keep stalking. Lol.
 

John Henry

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2007
35,503
172,359
113
here is a challenge. side by side, list the principles of socialism next to fascism. you are not allowed to use terms like right wing or left wing because your feeble mind doesn't know the difference between european parliamentary govt and our version of western capitalism. just list the principles regarding the markets, business, health care, how the govt sees it's role in economic principles, oh and the second amendment thing we have.

if you dare to accept, list these principles between socialism and fascism and how they relate?
This is way over his head. He would have a hard time explaining the difference between a republic and democracy. He would trip over that constitution thing.

While he is stumbling around trying to answer your question I would like him to also answer who has killed the most of their fellow citizens: Socialism or Fascism governments?
 

Leo3011

New member
Sep 7, 2019
30
9
0
This is way over his head. He would have a hard time explaining the difference between a republic and democracy. He would trip over that constitution thing.

While he is stumbling around trying to answer your question I would like him to also answer who has killed the most of their fellow citizens: Socialism or Fascism governments?

But let me guess: you’re well versed in all the nuance? I’m sure you’re quite the constitutional scholar. A true Paddock renaissance man. Everything from planting collard greens, skinning deer to political theories, there’s nothing this guy doesn’t know! [laughing]
 
Last edited:

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
15,086
11,447
0
"Leo" and "Ed" are the same person, confirmed and verified.

They aren't the same person, just possessed by the same radical left ideology... when you talk to them, it's not the person speaking but the same ideologue.

Leo is the sock account of a poster who fancies himself much smarter than he is, by surrounding himself with idiots he reinforces that delusion and loves calling everyone names (me in particular)... Ed sock account is just some guy that hates his life in central kentucky because he's surrounded by people that think he's a moran. May or may not be a pedo.

[thumb2]
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

Monroe Claxton

New member
Jun 4, 2015
3,021
4,685
0
Matt is doing a lot to help the state. He will eradicate Asian carp from Marshall county tonight and after a prayer breakfast, he will raid meth labs in Pike county.

Matt Jones, from Kentucky, for Kentucky
 
  • Like
Reactions: TortElvisII

Cal-4-Three

New member
Apr 2, 2011
1,591
1,844
0
Matt is doing a lot to help the state. He will eradicate Asian carp from Marshall county tonight and after a prayer breakfast, he will raid meth labs in Pike county.

Matt Jones, from Kentucky, for Kentucky

Lmao. He's pandering. Dude wants to represent Kentuckians and didn't even know his car needed oil and has never shot a gun. lol Good luck little fella.
 

John Henry

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2007
35,503
172,359
113
But let me guess: you’re well versed in all the nuance? I’m sure you’re quite the constitutional scholar. A true Paddock renaissance man. Everything from planting collard greens, skinning deer to political theories, there’s nothing this guy doesn’t know! [laughing]
I am well rounded. So tell me the difference between Socialism and Fascism. I will give you a hint. There is a difference. If you understand how to do research you can look it up. If not there are people on this board who can help you. Don't be too proud to ask.
 

BernieSadori

New member
Nov 16, 2004
30,278
8,935
0
National level? Not too many Republicans I'd vote against for Matt.

State level? He'd probably be my top choice no matter political party.

In other words, stay home.
 

Cawood86_rivals

New member
Feb 20, 2005
36,711
64,713
0
Voting for Matt Jones would be like the numbskulls who voted for AOC. No way would I vote for him.
MM has gotten many, many conservative Federal judges and on the bench and has done so very quietly because of his knowledge and ability to get things done in DC that really matter.
Jones is a loud mouth radio host with a big ego and nothing else but a couple of sidekicks that still likely light their farts on fire and burp the alphabet.
You're part of the problem if you would even consider voting for a complete joke like Jones.
 

jwheat

Member
Aug 21, 2005
97,626
24,206
42
I thought Matt Jones was black.
You’re thinking of American rapper Mike Jones

 
May 12, 2014
504
220
43
That infamous and wholly fascist NAZI (national SOCIALIST worker's) party says "hi" !!

While the economic principles of fascism differed hugely from one country to the next, the use of the word 'Socialism' was largely a ruse, PARTICULARLY in Germany, to woo workers to the party in its early days.

Facism in Germany was largely corporatist, not socialist, and the idea of redistribution of wealth was abhorrent to Hitler unless it was redistribution FROM minorities (especially Jews). There were only a few countries with facist movements that actually espoused socialist policies- France being one, and none of those really ever were large enough or popular enough to affect policy.

But they also weren't capitalist. Hitler and most Facists didn't envision a society in which there was upward movement between classes. Everything for the middle and lower classes was subservient to the state, and the government and major industry were sort of "partnered" to support the state military machine and enrich the elite. They very much supported a "planned" and "regulated" economy run by a conglomerate of the companies themselves (loosely organized into sort of industry trade councils) and the government, with no outside competition allowed.
 
Last edited:

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
15,086
11,447
0
The only people the fascists hated more than capitalists were the communists. For them, it was always about someone else which is incidentally precisely what the American radical left is all bout.

It's not the Jews which are the problem for them (though they contain their own antisemitic beliefs), but the privileged-heteronormative-white-christian-cisgendered-male-patriarch-systemic oppressed-capitalist-heirarchy which is the villian. It's open season on them, free to take from them and do whatever it takes to oppress them cause they are everything that's wrong in the world.
 

WonderBraa

New member
Feb 19, 2012
4,317
1,247
0
Voting for Matt Jones would be like the numbskulls who voted for AOC. No way would I vote for him.
MM has gotten many, many conservative Federal judges and on the bench and has done so very quietly because of his knowledge and ability to get things done in DC that really matter.
Jones is a loud mouth radio host with a big ego and nothing else but a couple of sidekicks that still likely light their farts on fire and burp the alphabet.
You're part of the problem if you would even consider voting for a complete joke like Jones.

Why do we need many conservative federal judges on the bench?
 

rmattox

New member
Nov 26, 2014
6,786
4,006
0
Here's why MM gets my vote:

As of August 1, 2019, the United States Senate has confirmed 144 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 43 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 99 judges for the United States District Courts.

This is how you end liberalism in the legal system.
EXACTLY!
The MOST important thing a POTUS does, IMO, is place judges. The proper placement of a SC Justice can impact law for the good for another forty years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

rmattox

New member
Nov 26, 2014
6,786
4,006
0
Why do we need many conservative federal judges on the bench?
To interpret the Constitution in a manner consistent with the actual wording of it and the overall intent of the writers. It is not to consider societal swings or changes of beliefs when it compares an issue to the Constitution.
For example: Does the wording of the Constitution support a woman's right to abortion? Same sex marriage? Did the original writers give any reason for the courts to believe that was the intent of the Constitution?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tannerdad