The memories of the the 4 year guys are more visceral. Can you imagine is Tyus had stayed 4 years? I'd have considered a tattoo and would've named my next boy or GIRL: Tyus.
Honestly, we'd have had a shot at 4 titles in a row, even with Amile going down. Worst case scenario, we're in 4 Final Fours in a row.
Tyus was a different type of player. He gave us a shot no matter what
I understand the sentiments regarding Tyus Jones. But the assumption that his presence would have guaranteed a Final Four appearance as a worst-case scenario seriously underestimates the difficulties of advancing that far in a one-and-done format.
In 2002 Duke started Carlos Boozer, Mike Dunleavy, Dahntay Jones, Jason Williams and Chris Duhon, the latter a sophomore, the other four juniors, Williams the national POY, the second and third picks in the 2002 draft. Six future NBA players.
In 2006 Duke started two consensus first-team All-Americans-one the national player of the year. Both seniors.
In 2011 Duke went into the Sweet Sixteen with Kyrie Irving, Kyle Singler, Nolan Smith, Mason Plumlee, Miles Plumlee, Seth Curry and Ryan Kelly, the first pick in the 2011 draft, two seniors who had started for an NCAA title team, two future big-man first-round draft picks. Eight future NBA players.
All of these teams lost in the Sweet Sixteen and all had more talent than Duke would have had in 2016 with Tyus Jones.
Jabari Parker and Rodney Hood couldn't even get Duke past Mercer.
It's just not that easy folks. Which makes K's track record all that more impressive. But I cringe a little bit every time I see a message-board post guaranteeing a deep NCAA run when and if Duke gets this one guy.
It's not that easy.
jimlsumner and dukiejay are right, when you says things like we would win 4 in a row or play in 4 finals in a row we sound like cryolina talking about Kendall Marshals lost championship.So did those other guys Jim mentioned.
I agree. I also think we just got flat out lazy in the second half of that game b/c we were up double digits. That team was by far and away superior to the Indiana team they lost too, they had no business losing that game. The way we lost was fitting too, as JW had problems all year at the line- he does the hard part nailing the three and getting fouled, and misses the FT. Boozer definitely got fouled, but at the end of the day we should have never been in that position. I dont know that we would have won it all, but we were good enough too.That 2002 team just had no business losing to that Indiana team. Still, in my opinion, the biggest upset in Duke's history (including the 1st round losses, because the 2012 or 2014 Devils were NOT National Championship caliber teams).
.jimlsumner and dukiejay are right, when you says things like we would win 4 in a row or play in 4 finals in a row we sound like cryolina talking about Kendall Marshals lost championship.
I agree. I also think we just got flat out lazy in the second half of that game b/c we were up double digits. That team was by far and away superior to the Indiana team they lost too, they had no business losing that game. The way we lost was fitting too, as JW had problems all year at the line- he does the hard part nailing the three and getting fouled, and misses the FT. Boozer definitely got fouled, but at the end of the day we should have never been in that position. I dont know that we would have won it all, but we were good enough too.
'99 and '04 sting big time to me. Mark brought up 2006 but that team had flaws- i loved that team b/c JJ is my favorite player but the problem with that team is that they would go through stretches of every single game of JJ watching. If JJ wasn't on, like he wasn't against LSU, we lost. He carried us in the ACC Championship (as he did multiple times in his career).
And if we had any of those other guys we would have had a good shot. Tyus was special and as clutch in his one year as anyone we've ever had not named Christian. But I don't think you're giving enough credit to the team we had around him last year. In order to be clutch Justise and Matt propelled us in the 16&8 rounds, in the final Grayson gave us the lift to be in a position to win at the end. So much went into it being a special year, which is why it is so difficult to do, and that is Jims point..
I don't think anybody is saying its gospel truth but with Tyus for four years we'd have a good shot the whole time
But he wasn't even our best player. The offense was run through Jahlil, and everyone else benefited because teams had to either double Jahlil or he was gonna score 30.
I understand the sentiments regarding Tyus Jones. But the assumption that his presence would have guaranteed a Final Four appearance as a worst-case scenario seriously underestimates the difficulties of advancing that far in a one-and-done format.
In 2002 Duke started Carlos Boozer, Mike Dunleavy, Dahntay Jones, Jason Williams and Chris Duhon, the latter a sophomore, the other four juniors, Williams the national POY, the second and third picks in the 2002 draft. Six future NBA players.
In 2006 Duke started two consensus first-team All-Americans-one the national player of the year. Both seniors.
In 2011 Duke went into the Sweet Sixteen with Kyrie Irving, Kyle Singler, Nolan Smith, Mason Plumlee, Miles Plumlee, Seth Curry and Ryan Kelly, the first pick in the 2011 draft, two seniors who had started for an NCAA title team, two future big-man first-round draft picks. Eight future NBA players.
All of these teams lost in the Sweet Sixteen and all had more talent than Duke would have had in 2016 with Tyus Jones.
Jabari Parker and Rodney Hood couldn't even get Duke past Mercer.
It's just not that easy folks. Which makes K's track record all that more impressive. But I cringe a little bit every time I see a message-board post guaranteeing a deep NCAA run when and if Duke gets this one guy.
It's not that easy.
No doubt. '99 and '04 stung because those Duke teams were championship-caliber, but those respective UConn teams were really good and definitely championship-worthy. The '99 team was 34-2 and had Rip Hamilton, Khalid El-Amin, Jake Voskuhl and the 2004 team was 33-6 and had Ben Gordon, Emeka Okafor, Rashad Anderson, Villenueva. It stings to lose, but it stings less to lose to a worthy adversary.
The 2006 team, as you say was a flawed squad. I think I remember reading at the time that no championship team had ever relied on two players to do as much of the scoring as Duke did with Redick and Williams. Those guys were almost 60% of Duke's offense that year. It was a razor's edge.
It was a bit overstated. It's absolutely fair to say his presence this year probably makes us a 1-seed, and that a jr season would answer our PG concerns. We'd be an obvious candidate for the FF every year... just like we were in '02, '06, '11....
I don't think anybody is saying its gospel truth but with Tyus for four years we'd have a good shot the whole time
I agree with pisgah. Tyus was the most cold blooded assasin I remember in a while. When I think of what he did at UVA, both UNC games, and the Natty I get chills of joy and tremendous pride for our school!.
I don't think anybody is saying its gospel truth but with Tyus for four years we'd have a good shot the whole time
..No matter how special Irving was...Nolan became such a spectator and didn't adjust great to being off-ball...
I don't think there was any issue about whether Nolan, Kyle, and Kyrie could coexist because they were phenomenal in the early season games before KI got hurt. They just had to become a different team in his absence. Had they of had the season to grow and evolve as a group, the sky was the limit. But they were trying to re-inigrate him in the tournament, after being another team for months, and it was tough.
That doesn't mean I question the decision. If you have a guy like Kyrie and he is healthy, you play him.
Haha I guess it doesn't really matter either way, even though no player has been to 4 straight final fours since some guy named Laettner 25 years ago. And that's in all of college basketball.I will continue to argue that Duke with Tyus for 4 years would've meant 4 FFs. He makes everyone better, and we were already very good last year. Expert ball control goes a long long way.
Sure, anything can happen come March. This would be my prediction though.
Yeah, but likely those losses would've been to top teams and when we were playing lazy. I like our chances for a FF run in that scenario.To Jim's point, when people say that 2011 would have been undefeated if Kyrie would have stayed healthy... Is a lot for me to swallow. Just wasn't happening.