Military Strikes on Iran Imminent
- Thread starter PalmettoTiger1
- Start date
I bet you would along with doing the sucking
What war are we going n clown??
Of course he wants to watch men suck dick !! Mf wants to suck them also
You've elicited that very comment from females for your entire life. No wonder you decided to play for the other team.
I was wrong on the Iran situation. I thought Trump was bluffing and talking shi t like he always does. I thought he was going to come to an agreement no matter what and was just doing the art of the deal.
Boy was I wrong. What a ballsy attack. What a flex of American military strength. What a way to buck the system and do things a different way.
It will probably be years before we can accurately judge the outcome of today’s results.
I’m kind of stunned. A little in awe. But overall, I’m impressed so far. America is much stronger than even our enemies thought and Trump is not afraid to remind you.
Congrats to out Military for a job well done so far! Keep up the good work.
Boy was I wrong. What a ballsy attack. What a flex of American military strength. What a way to buck the system and do things a different way.
It will probably be years before we can accurately judge the outcome of today’s results.
I’m kind of stunned. A little in awe. But overall, I’m impressed so far. America is much stronger than even our enemies thought and Trump is not afraid to remind you.
Congrats to out Military for a job well done so far! Keep up the good work.
I'd pick the dog over you and the dog would be alive. It's also a far better and honest companion than you are. You're just another nasty and angry liberal. You're probably part of the Democrat Socialists of America. You slap someone? Lmao. How very tough guy of you. Slap. Ohhhhhhhhh. So scary.
That's not remotely true. The IAEA never had access to military sites, sky surveillance, or full access to facilities. Why y'all try to defend the Iranian regime is laughable. They have never been trustworthy.
They constantly called for Death To America!
The regime sucked. They called Trumps bluff and he toasted them.
I was not supportive of a war, and still am not. But Trump has stunned me and I totally support what has been done so far. He is single handily changing the game. Good or bad, only time will tell. But we are off to a good start.
Obama and Biden were Neville Chamberlain towards Iran. They wouldn't have done anything to Hitler either. Trump is Patton with the 3rd Army. This will be game changing for the world. Meanwhile, the Democratic Socialists of America, funded by a commie in China, are supporting Iran in a protest today. Mamdani is a member.
I didn’t think it could be done but this is the stupidest fvçking thing I’ve ever read on this website.
I thought of something similar..for all those who are "outaged, upset or whatever", how different would the world be had we taken out Hitler and leaders of the 3rd Reich before they invaded Europe?
It took 20 days for the US to effectively topple the existing Iraqi government in 2003 and Saddam was captured less than 9 months into the conflict and that war would go on to last another 8 years officially and the resulting power vacuum would precipitate another decade and a half of conflict between the rise of ISIL and the Syrian civil war.
The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 and had deposed central Taliban authority and established an interim government with Kharzai by December. From October to March, the US sustained only 12 casualties to the 15,000+ suffered by Taliban fighters. That war would go on to last an additional 19 years.
The Iranian regime isn’t just the Iyatollah. It’s a substantial hierarchy of clerics. Cut off the head and the next successor will move up in line. Cut down further along the hierarchy and you create a larger number of co-equals contending for legitimacy and created opportunity for sectarian violence. The regime isn’t propped up by nothing, the IRGC, who’s charter is explicitly not to protect Iranian sovereignty but rather as the Ordo militant of the state religion, is well armed and either ideologically or opportunistically devoted to the sustainment of the current Iranian paradigm and will either coalesce to form the strongest faction in the coming sectarian violence or will fracture into multiple smaller paramilitary groups that will increase the velocity of that conflict.
It’s extremely “born yesterday” behavior to assume that the Disney movie ending is a likely outcome here where the people go out into the streets and bring back the Shah and live happily ever after with western democracy. I wish all the best for the Iranian people so don’t skew this into oatmeal brained chuddist “yOuRe cHeErINg foR tHe reGimE”. I grew up with an Iranian friend whose parents were a part of the diaspora that fled during the revolution and I’ve seen how much that disinheritance hurt his parents. I’m saying even a cursory understanding of the history of conflict and religious conflict in particular betrays how insanely ******* naive some posters in this thread are being in service to their own confirmation bias.
The US invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 and had deposed central Taliban authority and established an interim government with Kharzai by December. From October to March, the US sustained only 12 casualties to the 15,000+ suffered by Taliban fighters. That war would go on to last an additional 19 years.
The Iranian regime isn’t just the Iyatollah. It’s a substantial hierarchy of clerics. Cut off the head and the next successor will move up in line. Cut down further along the hierarchy and you create a larger number of co-equals contending for legitimacy and created opportunity for sectarian violence. The regime isn’t propped up by nothing, the IRGC, who’s charter is explicitly not to protect Iranian sovereignty but rather as the Ordo militant of the state religion, is well armed and either ideologically or opportunistically devoted to the sustainment of the current Iranian paradigm and will either coalesce to form the strongest faction in the coming sectarian violence or will fracture into multiple smaller paramilitary groups that will increase the velocity of that conflict.
It’s extremely “born yesterday” behavior to assume that the Disney movie ending is a likely outcome here where the people go out into the streets and bring back the Shah and live happily ever after with western democracy. I wish all the best for the Iranian people so don’t skew this into oatmeal brained chuddist “yOuRe cHeErINg foR tHe reGimE”. I grew up with an Iranian friend whose parents were a part of the diaspora that fled during the revolution and I’ve seen how much that disinheritance hurt his parents. I’m saying even a cursory understanding of the history of conflict and religious conflict in particular betrays how insanely ******* naive some posters in this thread are being in service to their own confirmation bias.
you're right. we've taken the easiest step. The hard part comes in establishing a government that the Iranian people will support - and not all of them will support the next leader. For us, we're not very good at nation building and that's why I think Trump/Netanyahu comments were appropriate..the Iranian people have to take the steps to build their own government. That's the hard part