More realignment still in the works?

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Here's a write up from a Kentucky site on some interesting comments recently from FSU's outgoing president:



"Outgoing Florida (State) President John Thrasher was interviewed by the Tallahassee Democrat and his comments about his current conference, the ACC, were less than committal. “My point to (FSU director of athletics) David Coburn and to (new ACC commissioner) Jim Phillips is I don’t want Florida State to be left behind. I consider us as part of the ACC, but I also know that we have a marquee name, Clemson has a marquee name. I think there might be people coming after us, I don’t know, but we’ve got to be prepared no matter what the options are.”


I think the “I consider us part of the ACC” portion was quite interesting. Would the SEC make another power move and raid the ACC taking away Florida State, Clemson, and maybe Miami? I wouldn’t be surprised if it happens eventually. It would probably be in the best interest of the ACC and the Big 10 to start moving on expanding or the SEC is going to gobble up whatever they want."
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
The problem with the SEC grabbing programs for purpose of expanding is they’ll eliminate competition. If the SEC gets to big they’ll eliminate interest in the test of the country. Take the NFL. Do Easterners watch Seahawks Against the Bronco? Nope. When the Giants and the Washington play are the ratings in Colorado or California high? Nope? College football is already regional and centered around big ticket games. If SEC expands too much everyone outside of the Southeast will get disinterested over time. Who cares about Texas against Auburn in PA.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
It does seem to be a strange plan. The CFP ratings dropped substantially because fans grew tired of no inclusion for their program— but the greedy powers that be are still rushing to monopolize the whike thing for the few- that they created in the first place. Texas- big state but whT have they done? Clemson 11-12 years ago was no one special. USC- I remember Reggie Bush games sort of but otherwise?

Yet 90 % of schools are going to be shuttered because Kirk Herbstreit only thinks his former conference and the SEC mean anything?

Still trying to figure out how South Carolina, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Missouri, AtM, Texas, Tennessee, Mississippi, Mississippi State, and for a long time Florida— what makes these schools “ deserving”?

College football wont be a popular sport for long if this trend isnt reversed.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0

2021



2020


Not too hard to figure it out

2021 only one state outside of the SEC with 10 or more draft picks
2020 only two states
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0

2021



2020


Not too hard to figure it out
Except of course players don't go to school ONLY in the states they play high school ball in.

NFL and college football are two completely separate things.

Plus the records of the SEC schools is still NOT GOOD much of the time and still NOT BETTER than dozens of schools left out perhaps.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
Except of course players don't go to school ONLY in the states they play high school ball in.

NFL and college football are two completely separate things.

Go to a camp especially in Georgia and start asking about schools.
These Top 100 players aren’t leaving the area.
Might catch one or two but not too many

But Greggor is right. People are loyal to where they are from.
But at the end of the day these media companies have a product to sell and people watch. As of right now it is the SEC.
Regardless of where they are from. A lot of people are naturally bandwagon fans
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Players go all over nowadays.

WVU has players from Alabama, Texas, Missouri, PA, Florida, Ga, Maryland, NY, Kentucky, Ohio, NJ, Illinois, North Carolina, Delaware, Michigan, etc. Also from overseas.

This isn't 1970s college football.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
Players go all over nowadays.

WVU has players from Alabama, Texas, Missouri, PA, Florida, Ga, Maryland, NY, Kentucky, Ohio, NJ, Illinois, North Carolina, Delaware, Michigan, etc. Also from overseas.

This isn't 1970s college football.

Typical fanboy take. All that matters is where the good players go. Diamond in the rough or under the radar recruiting is what the WVUs of the world rely on.
 

steeleer

New member
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
Here's a write up from a Kentucky site on some interesting comments recently from FSU's outgoing president:



"Outgoing Florida (State) President John Thrasher was interviewed by the Tallahassee Democrat and his comments about his current conference, the ACC, were less than committal. “My point to (FSU director of athletics) David Coburn and to (new ACC commissioner) Jim Phillips is I don’t want Florida State to be left behind. I consider us as part of the ACC, but I also know that we have a marquee name, Clemson has a marquee name. I think there might be people coming after us, I don’t know, but we’ve got to be prepared no matter what the options are.”


I think the “I consider us part of the ACC” portion was quite interesting. Would the SEC make another power move and raid the ACC taking away Florida State, Clemson, and maybe Miami? I wouldn’t be surprised if it happens eventually. It would probably be in the best interest of the ACC and the Big 10 to start moving on expanding or the SEC is going to gobble up whatever they want."
Hey John,

FSU was a marquee name. In 2 years, the only time you will hear "FSU" will be in the sentence "do you remember when?"

Which is exactly where Miami and VT and every mediocre ACC team not named Clemson is.

If Clemson goes, the ACC is screwed. I heavily doubt Clemson will demand FSU being invited along.
 

OlegeezEER

New member
May 18, 2016
1,187
0
0
Hey John,

FSU was a marquee name. In 2 years, the only time you will hear "FSU" will be in the sentence "do you remember when?"

Which is exactly where Miami and VT and every mediocre ACC team not named Clemson is.

If Clemson goes, the ACC is screwed. I heavily doubt Clemson will demand FSU being invited along.
If you believe the recruiting rankings then in 2 years FSU will be a power. Any potential raid of the acc is probably a decade away at the earliest. Who knows what FSU or even Clemson will look like then.
 

OlegeezEER

New member
May 18, 2016
1,187
0
0
Typical fanboy take. All that matters is where the good players go. Diamond in the rough or under the radar recruiting is what the WVUs of the world rely on.
True statement Greg the success of programs like wvu depend mostly on their ability to turn 3 star guys into 5 star guys.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
True statement Greg the success of programs like wvu depend mostly on their ability to turn 3 star guys into 5 star guys.


Tough sledding for the WVUs and Pitts of the world. Not saying it can’t be done. Just unrealistic to think it can be done year in year out. That’s why I tip my hat to programs like Wisconsin that do more with less.
 

OlegeezEER

New member
May 18, 2016
1,187
0
0
Tough sledding for the WVUs and Pitts of the world. Not saying it can’t be done. Just unrealistic to think it can be done year in year out. That’s why I tip my hat to programs like Wisconsin that do more with less.
Have to get the best people to run the show for sure and can't hesitate to make a change when things are stagnant.
 

steeleer

New member
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
If you believe the recruiting rankings then in 2 years FSU will be a power. Any potential raid of the acc is probably a decade away at the earliest. Who knows what FSU or even Clemson will look like then.

If recruiting ranking won games, Texas would have won a few more national title the past 20 years.
They have no coaching Or player development.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0

Keeler: Texas, Oklahoma killed college football as we know it. Now CU Buffs might be wise to follow Nebraska’s lead and call Big Ten.​


Excerpt:
“Whichever one of those conferences is going to survive, if you can get in it, get in it,” the former Buffs coach replied. “So I would say, if you look at the Big Ten and say, ‘Is the Big Ten more likely to survive at a higher level than the Pac-12,’ then I would say do what you can do to get in there. Because once you get that brand, you can keep it.
“It’s getting it that’s hard. It’s like Missouri going to the SEC. They made a move. They were just lucky to get in there because they moved into the best brand in college football. And now they’re going to be able to stay (stable) through this (realignment), no matter what. And that’s critical.”
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
Wait! You have thrown one post up after another saying Big12 is good and the rest of the programs are excellent. Why would you post a link providing support for everything I’ve posted?

3,2,1
Move the goalposts expansion boy.
 
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
My evaluation when this all becomes set in cement is whether WVU will make more or less money than it does now because that's critical for the sports that aren't football or basketball, both self-supporting, with football supporting golf, tennis, etc.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,331
250
63
My evaluation when this all becomes set in cement is whether WVU will make more or less money than it does now because that's critical for the sports that aren't football or basketball, both self-supporting, with football supporting golf, tennis, etc.
I'm thinking they make less money.