Pick a midpoint between my incoherent rambling and the airlines' propaganda and you're probably in the area where the dust needs to settle.
Pick a midpoint between my incoherent rambling and the airlines' propaganda and you're probably in the area where the dust needs to settle.
jethreaux bringin' the pain. Cold hard truth. Prepare to be downvoted.We’re too stupid to realize this early on helps explain why so many schools suck in the first place.
The good part about schools generally being so ineffective is that kids in functional and semi-functional school districts will more or less catch up, or at least the ones in elementary school now. High schoolers that don't go on to college may miss out on stuff they don't catch up on.
It is a shame that the education of children takes a back seat to almost every other issue in politics. We could have had all the panic porn we wanted while still letting kids get educated.
I don't understand why parents of elementary school students wouldn't just decide to home school if they are going to do virtual. I get the parents that have checked out and having them at home in front of the tv while the computer is on is less work for them than having to get the kids up and out the door to school.
But doing home school would be easier for me than trying to get them to pay attention to a screen with a teacher on it. Will be able to move much faster just focused on a couple of children and be done with it in half the time compared to trying to keep them engaged in a slow moving lesson on a computer screen.
You can't work and homeschool. Not successfully anyway.I don't understand why parents of elementary school students wouldn't just decide to home school if they are going to do virtual. I get the parents that have checked out and having them at home in front of the tv while the computer is on is less work for them than having to get the kids up and out the door to school.
But doing home school would be easier for me than trying to get them to pay attention to a screen with a teacher on it. Will be able to move much faster just focused on a couple of children and be done with it in half the time compared to trying to keep them engaged in a slow moving lesson on a computer screen.
You can't work and homeschool. Not successfully anyway.
mstateglfr isn't correct either though. He thinks this virtual school is better than homeschooling, which it isn't, at least in general. He just says it is because reasons. I'm guessing he thinks the teachers are more qualified than the parents. Fart. They are using a curriculum just like anyone else. Without the resources of the school, it's not better. Virtual sucks. The only good thing about the virtual platforms is actually learning the virtual platforms, in the event they need to use them in some other emergency situation.
This is not a rant against schools (not all schools anyway). It's a rant against virtual horseshit.
Homeschooling is hard. That's why most folks aren't doing it. And you sacrifice a second income. Everything worth doing, at some point, takes a sacrifice. Plus you pay taxes for schools you don't use.He just says it is because reasons. Well yeah, its always because reasons. Virtual is better than homeschool for us- that is all im saying. I have no idea if its better for others- I dont know everyone's setup/situation. I am sure virtual is better than homeschool for many others too. If homeschool would be better, I would assume those families are already homeschooling.
I dont think teachers are more qualified than parents. I also dont think parents are more qualified than teachers. To claim either is 17ing stupid because it is too broad a brush. I readily admit that I would struggle to teach math to my oldest- like her current math. In that instance, hell yes her teacher is better. But I know I could more than competently teach her current Social Studies and History topics, so in that instance maybe her teacher isnt better(though also not worse).
In general, yes I do think an AP Bio teacher will teach that level of Biology better than the average of 10 parents. Same for Calculus, Trig, Physics, Chemistry, etc etc.
At the elementary age though, a lot of parents could teach their children just fine.
This is a funny topic since my sister literally teaches my youngest kid. Yeah, I trust she is more qualified than me to teach. Her multiple degrees, longstanding knowledge and understanding of the topics, and years of experience outweigh my degree from MSU and general experience as a parent.
The average adult is a 17ing moron and half the population is dumber. Teachers are typically not in the lower half, but a lot of parents are.
Again, I look forward to when everyone's kids can be in class at the same time. Its the most ideal situation. I dont want virtual.
You can't work and homeschool. Not successfully anyway.
mstateglfr isn't correct either though. He thinks this virtual school is better than homeschooling, which it isn't, at least in general. He just says it is because reasons. I'm guessing he thinks the teachers are more qualified than the parents. Fart. They are using a curriculum just like anyone else. Without the resources of the school, it's not better. Virtual sucks. The only good thing about the virtual platforms is actually learning the virtual platforms, in the event they need to use them in some other emergency situation.
This is not a rant against schools (not all schools anyway). It's a rant against virtual horseshit.
Homeschooling is hard. That's why most folks aren't doing it. And you sacrifice a second income. Everything worth doing, at some point, takes a sacrifice. Plus you pay taxes for schools you don't use.
Private school takes money, and due to that, parents are still very involved. Plenty of sacrifice there. And same with the taxes above.
Public schools benefit from the sacrifice of the collective (taxes). Then, to do it well, it takes sacrifice by the parents, to really stay involved and on top of it.
Then you have charters/magnets, which are different deals altogether. But someone has to pay.
You choose your own level of sacrifice.
You can't work and homeschool. Not successfully anyway.
mstateglfr isn't correct either though. He thinks this virtual school is better than homeschooling, which it isn't, at least in general. He just says it is because reasons. I'm guessing he thinks the teachers are more qualified than the parents. Fart. They are using a curriculum just like anyone else. Without the resources of the school, it's not better. Virtual sucks. The only good thing about the virtual platforms is actually learning the virtual platforms, in the event they need to use them in some other emergency situation.
This is not a rant against schools (not all schools anyway). It's a rant against virtual horseshit.
It was that way at the National Island Seashore in Florida too. At its most crowded, that beach has groups of people at least 15 feet apart.
He just says it is because reasons. Well yeah, its always because reasons. Virtual is better than homeschool for us- that is all im saying. I have no idea if its better for others- I dont know everyone's setup/situation. I am sure virtual is better than homeschool for many others too. If homeschool would be better, I would assume those families are already homeschooling.
I dont think teachers are more qualified than parents. I also dont think parents are more qualified than teachers. To claim either is 17ing stupid because it is too broad a brush. I readily admit that I would struggle to teach math to my oldest- like her current math. In that instance, hell yes her teacher is better. But I know I could more than competently teach her current Social Studies and History topics, so in that instance maybe her teacher isnt better(though also not worse).
In general, yes I do think an AP Bio teacher will teach that level of Biology better than the average of 10 parents. Same for Calculus, Trig, Physics, Chemistry, etc etc.
At the elementary age though, a lot of parents could teach their children just fine.
This is a funny topic since my sister literally teaches my youngest kid. Yeah, I trust she is more qualified than me to teach. Her multiple degrees, longstanding knowledge and understanding of the topics, and years of experience outweigh my degree from MSU and general experience as a parent.
The average adult is a 17ing moron and half the population is dumber. Teachers are typically not in the lower half, but a lot of parents are.
Again, I look forward to when everyone's kids can be in class at the same time. Its the most ideal situation. I dont want virtual.
The social part has been debunked. Unless you're a total noob, you can have your kids in other social settings besides a school (many of which are now modeled after prisons). Most homeschoolers are also part of bigger groups that get together regularly.It depends on the knowledge of the one doing the homeschooling, i.e., the parent(s). But not being in school definitely isn't good from a social interaction standpoint. Hopefully all schools can open fully after Christmas break.
The social part has been debunked. Unless you're a total noob, you can have your kids in other social settings besides a school (many of which are now modeled after prisons). Most homeschoolers are also part of bigger groups that get together regularly.
And just for reference, no schools are going to open with people like you out there propagating fear.
The baby boomers told us a lot of things. We are living in a world shaped by them.We spent 25 years telling students that becoming a tradesman is socially beneath getting any college degree. The result is tons of liberal arts majors working as baristas at Starbucks and a massive need for essential tradesman.
I have enjoyed reading this discussion.
But I actually think the schools have been over-educating about 60% of students when they get to the 8th grade. 40% or less are possibly college and leadership material. The other 60% or more need to get enough reading, writing, and arithmetic to be functional in a trade or industrial position. Way too many politicians, lawyers, and Socialogists/English majors.
We need equal opportunity for females to be Diesel Mechanics, Pipefitters, Drillers, welders, bulldozer drovers. Yes, even the red head females.
Not all boomers. Liberal boomers spread that one.The baby boomers told us a lot of things. We are living in a world shaped by them.
Someone also forgot to tell him its tacky as **** to declare what your salary is.The guy that framed my house told me he made $375,000 in 2019. Someone forgot to tell him that being a tradesman was low on the social pecking order!
Nearly every other country in the world does it that way. We are pretty much the lone ranger in how we do it.Ive seen this suggested a lot thru the last decade in op-eds and on message boards. Its an interesting idea, but it very much ignores a lot of negatives.
- tracking kids into a trade at 13 years old seems super early. They are barely a teenager and there is a ton of growth ahead of them where reducing the variety of education will hurt the kid's chances of being exposed to something they both enjoy and excel at.
- reducing education overall or specializing it too early will limit the kid's experiences and skillset for later in life.
- how much welding or plumbing training is needed from 13 to 18? Even 3 hours a week(3 classes weekly) for all of high school would be a ton of welding experience. That leaves a huge amount of time for traditional classes still. Really, its basically just an elective spot that is taken up. Does a 14 year old need half their day dedicated to welding or learning how to wire a house?
Again though, there should absolutely be trade classes in public schools. Auto repair, welding, robotics, plumbing, electricity, and more should all be topics that are available to learn and experience.
A big issue is that these offerings arent realistic in rural districts due to cost and interest. Having a fully stocked and working garage is expensive if only a handful of kids want to learn auto repair each semester. Its the same reason why many rural districts dont offer Japanese or Italian as a foreign language- the cost is too high and interest is too low.
The other issue is the long standing narrative that a college education is the safest way to statistically ensure a higher than average salary through life.
Some trade jobs are seen as risky to many because the work can be inconsistent. A general example- it does no good to claim the average hourly pay is $30/hour if work is inconsistent and only averages out to 30 hours per week through the year with many unplanned breaks. A specific example- welding job postings around me are listed at $16-32/hour. That just doesnt seem like a good enough reason to pull kids out of traditional schooling to dedicate a significant portion of their day to learning how to weld.
The other issue is wear and tear on the body- working as a Loan Specialist at Wells Fargo for 40 years is easy on the body- hell you have to actually decide to get movement in outside of work, since the job is so easy on the body. Working in a trade has a significantly higher risk to injury and long term wear and tear. The work is simply harder on the body.
There are some real hurdles that must be addressed and corrected before we collectively pull 60% of our teens out of most of their traditional schooling and direct them into learning trades.
High School as it is now is worthless to the majority of Students.... a good solution would be to use the 9th Grade to evaluate students to match their skill sets for future career and use grades 10-12 to partner with industry to train students for their career.... To be honest, probably more than 50% of College students in Mississippi have no business being in college.
Obviously you are one. You check all the boxes.Not all boomers. Liberal boomers spread that one.
It's very close to how we did it until the late 1970s.Umm. That's communism.
LOL, Y'all still are under that delusion because I dared not march in lock step with you on one issue. I'm probably WAY more conservative than you are. I was the resident Nazi on the old MSU political board, at least according to the libs there.Obviously you are one. You check all the boxes.
It's very close to how we did it until the late 1970s.
Silliness. You are actually the sheep by bowing to the almighty virus, which is the mainstream. People, like me, that are questioning the nonsense, are the outcast minority. Let's keep this truthful.LOL, Y'all still are under that delusion because I dared not march in lock step with you on one issue. I'm probably WAY more conservative than you are. I was the resident Nazi on the old MSU political board, at least according to the libs there.