Mullen is 17ed either way next Saturday on this board.

[SkullCandy.sixpack]

If you think Dan is 17nd now--

-- imagine the noise if HUD's team beats the bears when LL plays next year in Oxford.

 

[cheewgumm]

Don't worry. Eventually everyone gets tired of just beating swac and Mac teams. They'll all come around in time. It may be too late to get your boy hudspeth but that's the price we pay for our fans being like they are.

As long as they think we should win 6 and be happy ...at the same time schedule 4 swac teams then Kentucky and vandy... It's gonna take some time.

If we went 7-6 in year 5, with wins over 2 9-win BCS conference opponents including our rival and third SEC bowl team, I'd think we would be inclined to be patient with Mullen...Fact is, we haven't beaten a bowl-eligible SEC team since Kentucky on Halloween 2010.

He's been very close to silencing his critics(and never having most of us become critics) -- but it's been long enough and he's got to break through. IMO if he beats South Carolina OR Ole Miss at this point, he's broken through...

 

[Sutterkane]

Not happening. Hud's already played Freeze with better talent at Arkansas State and lost.

 

[121Josey]

Sure they can. Just like we can still win the west.

This post is as intelligent as Mullen's 3rd Qtr playcalling.

USCe has ^MSU, bye, ^UF left. UMizz has ^UT, @UK, bye, @TSUN, @A&M. USCe has tie-breaker with UMizz. If three teams are tied, tie-breaker goes to the highest BCS ranking.

 

[Shmuley]

Your "6-6 Safety Theory" works ....... as long as ...................................................................

As long as one of those 6 Ws is against the ******** up north. If he loses to them this year, he's in deep ****.

 

[CoolDawg]

So, do you disagree that Mullen was hired to win football games? If he wasn't hired to win games, then what the heck was he hired to do?