Mullen's Philosophy

dawg21

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
129
0
0
Just from observation, there are some things that I really like about Mullen's philosophy:

1. Hold camps, evaluate players in person, redshirt almost everyone, develop players and have 22-23 year olds dominating your roster every year

2. Discipline- players are held accountable (obvious- several suspensions every year - weed, class, etc). But its all relatively quite until gameday and then the game itself and the team performance smothers these issues. I think this works well for injuries too.

3. Playing time- it is held in high regard for those who have followed the rules. I think this keeps a sense of respect about what the team works for during the whole course of the year- you've got to work hard to play- no matter how good you are.

Which brings me to the one thing I do not understand completely-

Why do we insist on playing certain people when better players are on the bench? Malcolm Johnson is a beast. Tubby Lewis (albeit butter fingers) can make plays nobody on our team can make. Dak Prescott needs more goaline opportunities. We've had defensive players that are liabilities see way more time than the 3rd string who is clearly better.

All of this has been said by others, but I think this is all part of Mullen's philosophy- to play players that have built "trust"- or basically been here longer. Overall I like the idea, but sometimes you've gotta put the players out there that makes plays.

Also, I think our secondary would be better if we moved Banks back to safety and Broomfield to corner. Banks can do it all, Broomfield has not transistioned well at safety. Probably too late to try that but just an idea.
 

esplanade91

Redshirt
Dec 9, 2010
5,656
0
0
There's no way in hell Mullen screws Banks over with only 3 games left by moving him to safety. It would be a cluster anyway.
 

lazlow

Junior
Jul 9, 2009
894
217
43
Just from observation, there are some things that I really like about Mullen's philosophy:


Also, I think our secondary would be better if we moved Banks back to safety and Broomfield to corner. Banks can do it all, Broomfield has not transistioned well at safety. Probably too late to try that but just an idea.

I think our secondary would be better if we got to the muther17'n QB....if we could do that then even broomfield might pass as a stud at FS.
 

Dawgdom

Redshirt
Sep 20, 2011
330
0
0
The man has never met a time-out that he didn't love...never wants to part with them.
 

Singer

Redshirt
Nov 6, 2012
123
0
0
The man has never met a time-out that he didn't love...never wants to part with them.
For real right A&M down 24 at half and no time outs used. Don't time outs help change momentum and help give time for adjustments. I don't criticize coaches but that does confuse me too.