Either onewould be coolwill beat us.
Likely a loss for NU.That’s a quick day trip, wouldn’t complain there. Not sure how confident I am in a W though.
We might win if a lot of their players skip the bowl game like BC players did last year.Likely a loss for NU.
LSU is more interesting that Mizzou simply because of the Lane factor now. How many kids stay to play in '26, will some be told to move along, if told they fit in the plans next year some could be motivated to stay and play pretty hard.We might win if a lot of their players skip the bowl game like BC players did last year.
We'd feel the same way if NU was 11-1 and rated #4 right?I view the bowls as more of a spring game vibe at this point. Basically exhibition games where the young players get a chance to show something.
You realize after the play in rounds are bowl games in the CFP? A lot of top players and draft choices have set out the bowl games the last couple years.No - because then they would be in the playoff and that’s an entirely different world where likely starters are continuing to play and NFL prospects are too.
I would get a kick out of an LSU matchup because I know so many people in NOLA. I can do the self-deprecating "we suck you'll kill us" thing with gusto and if a miracle happens and we win I'll give them the "wow, LSU must be terrible because we suck."
Might as well give Kiffin a first hand look at 2-3 NU kids he might want to poach.I would get a kick out of an LSU matchup because I know so many people in NOLA. I can do the self-deprecating "we suck you'll kill us" thing with gusto and if a miracle happens and we win I'll give them the "wow, LSU must be terrible because we suck."
If Pritchett decides to declare he would officially be as dumb as he looks.....That guy has all the tools, measurements, recruiting pedigree to be a first rounder. Hes just mentally weak and immature.LSU is more interesting that Mizzou simply because of the Lane factor now. How many kids stay to play in '26, will some be told to move along, if told they fit in the plans next year some could be motivated to stay and play pretty hard.
Your point is well taken though, the bowls and even the CFP becomes a crap shoot until we figure out who wants to play, who wants to sit out, and who actually wants to get ready to play in a bowl game.
We know DR won't play, its possible EJ will sit out, what if Pritchett decides to declare? Exactly where does NU get its points against a pretty decent team like LSU or Mizzou?
Which is why he is almost certain to move on one way or the other, unless Uncle Donnie has been replaced with a competent coach before the portal opens -- or he likes having no accountability and doesn't care about winning.If Pritchett decides to declare he would officially be as dumb as he looks.....That guy has all the tools, measurements, recruiting pedigree to be a first rounder. Hes just mentally weak and immature.
. . . . He just needs a little maturing and the right coach.
We are going to VegasThat’s a quick day trip, wouldn’t complain there. Not sure how confident I am in a W though.
That’s my point as to why the bowl games are being exhibition. If we were 11-1 and top 4 seed in the playoffs … that’s what matters. Bowl games are and will continue to be less significant than the playoff.You realize after the play in rounds are bowl games in the CFP? A lot of top players and draft choices have set out the bowl games the last couple years.
My point being, what would the NU offense look like if those guys sat out? It wasn't really an endorsement of Pritchett, but since he's about the only guy with playing time along with Evan that could return next year, exactly how inept could this NU offense be in a bowl game?If Pritchett decides to declare he would officially be as dumb as he looks.....That guy has all the tools, measurements, recruiting pedigree to be a first rounder. Hes just mentally weak and immature.
He could go today and fight it out for late rounds or free agency, or he could grow up, get one solid year getting his conditioning and mind right, and be a first day pick. He just needs a little maturing and the right coach.
Unless you’re Iowa. Who looks at every bowl game like they have all the significance in the world. We get to play an SEC team!!That’s my point as to why the bowl games are being exhibition. If we were 11-1 and top 4 seed in the playoffs … that’s what matters. Bowl games are and will continue to be less significant than the playoff.
I went to the last music city bowl and it was freaking cold. Hoping we land at a warmer destination.
You realize the semi-finals and final CFP games are actual bowl games, right?That’s my point as to why the bowl games are being exhibition. If we were 11-1 and top 4 seed in the playoffs … that’s what matters. Bowl games are and will continue to be less significant than the playoff.
Yes Easy I get that the “bowl games” are a part of the playoff. I’m referring to any bowl game that is not the playoff format. I think it’s pretty easy to draw a significant distinction between the two types of “bowl games”. Ie one set actually means something and the other is an exhibition.You realize the semi-finals and final CFP games are actual bowl games, right?
Quarterfinals: Cotton Bowl, Orange Bowl, Rose Bowl, Sugar Bowl;
Semifinals: Fiesta Bowl, Peach Bowl.
CFP National Title Game
Most likely, Vegas picks before the Music and I doubt they choose Illinois over Nebraska .We are going to Vegas
If the other bowls were exhibitions they wouldn't keep stats that count for season totals.Yes Easy I get that the “bowl games” are a part of the playoff. I’m referring to any bowl game that is not the playoff format. I think it’s pretty easy to draw a significant distinction between the two types of “bowl games”. Ie one set actually means something and the other is an exhibition.
I know they aren’t actually exhibitions … I realize they count toward overall record. It was a comment made reflecting the lesser value of the bowls (non playoff). We never know who is going to play, top players opt out, etc.If the other bowls were exhibitions they wouldn't keep stats that count for season totals.
Playing the bottom of the barrel bowl games is fruitless. Winning or losing doesn't move the program forward when you get another loser team. Eventually Matt will figure out becoming eligible for these nothing bowls doesn't exactly mean playing for championships or whatever bullsh*t he promised us the last 3 years.I know they aren’t actually exhibitions … I realize they count toward overall record. It was a comment made reflecting the lesser value of the bowls (non playoff). We never know who is going to play, top players opt out, etc.
I am happy to argue semantics over the actual point that the non-playoff bowls are not as important due to the opt-outs and therefore seem like more exhibitions because we may not be playing the best of the opponent and them of us … as a result opportunities arise for younger players. If you disagree - please make the case they are every bit as important of a conference game.![]()
I actually think a matchup with LSU would be a lot of fun. They are a bit in flux right now and Nussmeier very likely would opt out. We'd have a month to test out a 4-3 front as our base and hopefully the new DC will be onboard beforehand.Apparently the Music City Bowl is more and more likely. LSU or Mizzery
It's been reported that Snow will be the interim DC for the bowl game.I actually think a matchup with LSU would be a lot of fun. They are a bit in flux right now and Nussmeier very likely would opt out. We'd have a month to test out a 4-3 front as our base and hopefully the new DC will be onboard beforehand.
For some reason, people don't get this.Yes Easy I get that the “bowl games” are a part of the playoff. I’m referring to any bowl game that is not the playoff format. I think it’s pretty easy to draw a significant distinction between the two types of “bowl games”. Ie one set actually means something and the other is an exhibition.
The playoffs are made for TV revenue. Just another nail in the coffin of college football as we knew it.For some reason, people don't get this.
The playoff "bowls" are clearly not a bowl game. No one even knows or cares about the name of those playoff bowl games.
I would have to disagree with you on this.For some reason, people don't get this.
The playoff "bowls" are clearly not a bowl game. No one even knows or cares about the name of those playoff bowl games.
The most likely is Vegas, against Utah.Apparently the Music City Bowl is more and more likely. LSU or Mizzery
The most likely is Vegas, against Utah.
Could be a high scoring game. Sounds like ku and ksu ran on Utah. Utah likes to run and we can't stop the runMaybe Rhule can take some notes on what a well coached team looks like.