Naz v Fenwick (Video)

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,279
3,845
113
Looks like the other thread got flushed. But for anyone interested the game is online in two parts. No need to pay for the hudl stream.

1st half.


2nd half


Jmo but it looked like the calls being discussed yesterday were correct.
 
Nov 7, 2018
625
892
93
Looks like the other thread got flushed. But for anyone interested the game is online in two parts. No need to pay for the hudl stream.

1st half.


2nd half


Jmo but it looked like the calls being discussed yesterday were correct.


In general, Naz should have won that game. That interception in the final 3 minutes was a dagger and then to top it off with the field goal situation, although the right call (dead ball), is just brutal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jha618

godfthr53

All-Conference
Sep 8, 2008
4,918
2,707
113
In general, Naz should have won that game. That interception in the final 3 minutes was a dagger and then to top it off with the field goal situation, although the right call (dead ball), is just brutal.
Interested in a non biased take of the safety in the 1st.
 

dweise

Junior
Nov 3, 2006
456
386
63
Interested in a non biased take of the safety in the 1st.
The play in question can be seen at the 16:30 mark of the first half video posted by the OP. Sure looks like a safety to me unless I missing some nuanced clause in the rule.
 

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,279
3,845
113
The play in question can be seen at the 16:30 mark of the first half video posted by the OP. Sure looks like a safety to me unless I missing some nuanced clause in the rule.

Interested in a non biased take of the safety in the 1st.
To me safety, or intentional grounding wouldn't have been the right call. It looked like his arm was hit during his throwing motion and I dont believe where the ball landed was where he was intending to throw the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon622286

RetiredReferee

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2011
1,048
1,041
113
The play in question can be seen at the 16:30 mark of the first half video posted by the OP. Sure looks like a safety to me unless I missing some nuanced clause in the rule.
I can't tell if the ball made it back to the LOS, but keep in mind that the LOS goes on forever.
 

dweise

Junior
Nov 3, 2006
456
386
63
Yeah, the video doesn't show where the ball landed. It looks like it was close but you would think the linesman would have had a good look at it.

It appears to me that there were no receivers close to where he was intending to throw. I would defer to any officials on this board in terms of the contact effecting the call. For any expert lipreaders out there, it looks like the official gives the reason for the incomplete pass call at the 17:07 mark of the first half video posted in the OP.