That and $2 gets you a cup of coffee.ESPN just said Rutgers and Clemson should be in over Nevada and Arizona St.!!
That and $2 gets you a cup of coffee.ESPN just said Rutgers and Clemson should be in over Nevada and Arizona St.!!
Yes, I heard the committee chair say that on Saturday when discussing how the top seeds were determined. i didn't know that was a factor. Doesn't seem fair.Seems they put a heavy emphasis on injured players coming into the tournament. Never knew that was a criterion.
the guys's trying to make excuses but getting caught in the details. If he's saying they dropped us out because of Mag injury and having all the quad 4 losses then he should be discounting losses early in season when we were without starters. So either you care that there were injuries and it means something or it doesnt.Sounds like they counted us out after the Mag injury based on the chairman
Lots of reasons..scheduling, 60 second meltdown at Minny, refs at OSU. Still think we got hosed, but whatever. We won some weNah has a good deal to do with scheduling. Leaves you little room for error
Ding DingThe Big has 9 teams in. It looks like the committee does not want as many from 1 conference again. Maybe it would be different if the Big10 performed better in the tournament the last 2 years.
They also said step up the OOC schedule.That and $2 gets you a cup of coffee.
I agree the committee sucks *** and we deserve to be in.Shitting the bed in a couple games doesn’t define the resume.
Our resume from top to bottom is significantly better than multiple teams that got a bid over us.
This is called the committee put a B1G cap of 8 teams due to lack of success in the tournament. PSU’s BTT run screwed us.
Yup. It’s all opinions. Can’t leave it to the committee just like you can’t leave it to the refs. We are on the bubble every year which is great, but have to do a little better to rest easy.That and $2 gets you a cup of coffee.
Could be argued NCState should step up and get more then 1 Quad winThey also said step up the OOC schedule.
I had no idea as well until he utter it. They also counted bad losses more than good wins. NC ST. 1-6 in Quad 1. So basically, it doesn't matter who you beat where, just don't lose to who you aren't supposed to lose to. Scheduling had nothing to do with being left out if they're going to put NC St. and Neveda in over us.Yes, I heard the committee chair say that on Saturday when discussing how the top seeds were determined. i didn't know that was a factor. Doesn't seem fair.
I agreeThey did not want to give big ten 9 teams
Well, we want to be considered NYs team when it comes to media rights & conference relevance, but not scheduling big games.Not a neutral though.
A home against Sparty, for a quad 2 win.
That’s the difference.
Our AD should have had a fit when it was announced as a home game.
When it’s your only high Q1 win it’s not enough to offset so many bad losses.Winning on the road at a one seed is meaningless
We were the only team in the B1G to not play in a holiday tournament. I’m not saying that’s the answer, but it wouldn’t hurt as a start.They also said step up the OOC schedule.
Thought I read Pike tried to get a few teams but no one wanted to play us. Again could be wrongWe were the only team in the B1G to not play in a holiday tournament. I’m not saying that’s the answer, but it wouldn’t hurt as a start.
Pike is not one to pout. He'll use this as an opportunity to teach the guys about being the master of your own destiny and not ***** when you fail to.We definitely got tipped off though. Which is weird because Pike sounded cheerful on the FAN earlier.
Not in a holiday tournament where you enter in advance. There are at least a dozen of these every year and we were the only B1G team not to play in one.Thought I read Pike tried to get a few teams but no one wanted to play us. Again could be wrong
Injuries experienced during the season vs. player availability for the tournament are different.the guys's trying to make excuses but getting caught in the details. If he's saying they dropped us out because of Mag injury and having all the quad 4 losses then he should be discounting losses early in season when we were without starters. So either you care that there were injuries and it means something or it doesnt.
Apparently no big wins and no big losses. MediocrityConsidering 95% plus of the brackets had Rutgers in then not sure what these guys want
But NC State beat Duke. It doesn't matter that Duke couldn't hit the ocean from the beach then. I feel bad for the folks here and elsewhere who actually try to scientifically figure out brackets. Just accept certain things are skewed a certain way (ie UNC 3rd out haha).NC State being in is a screwjob to sanity.
Them over you guys is pretty embarrassing for the committee. Nobody can defend that with a straight face.
That's like taking second at a pie eating contest. You still feel sick to your stomach but without the prize.Turning page to the NIT. Let’s rally around the team here. Xavier did win the NIT last year… look where they are now. Obviously sickening what just happened but I look forward to the team trying to win an NIT championship.
i guess. separately though, he just said on espn that they never turned it around after the injury and thats why the injury excuse kept them out which is a complete head scratcher. then said they had chance to win early on in non-conf which is when they also had injuries. and if they really meant what they said, then Houston cant be a 1 seed if their top player is not even playing at this point.Injuries experienced during the season vs. player availability for the tournament are different.
clemson lost to 4-win Louisville....Sucks for us. How do you think Clemson feels? They beat NC St 3 times. All double figures with two 20+ point wins. That’s laughable too. Cannot leave it up to the committee.
Goes against people trying to say there is no recency bias and the entire schedule is what counts in total. If that’s true it shouldn’t matter that we lost after an injury shortly before the tourney, no?i guess. separately though, he just said on espn that they never turned it around after the injury and thats why the injury excuse kept them out which is a complete head scratcher. then said they had chance to win early on in non-conf which is when they also had injuries. and if they really meant what they said, then Houston cant be a 1 seed if their top player is not even playing at this point.
No …it’s your team going into the tournamentthe guys's trying to make excuses but getting caught in the details. If he's saying they dropped us out because of Mag injury and having all the quad 4 losses then he should be discounting losses early in season when we were without starters. So either you care that there were injuries and it means something or it doesnt.
Xavier fired their coach last year because they went to the NIT . What a terrible exampleTurning page to the NIT. Let’s rally around the team here. Xavier did win the NIT last year… look where they are now. Obviously sickening what just happened but I look forward to the team trying to win an NIT championship.
Do you really follow college BB?Turning page to the NIT. Let’s rally around the team here. Xavier did win the NIT last year… look where they are now. Obviously sickening what just happened but I look forward to the team trying to win an NIT championship.
Some of these people don’tDo you really follow college BB?
Xavier made the tournament this year because they hired Sean Miller after missing the tournament in 2022.