Do you still think the NFL plays the Anthem to make money?
No, I think the NFL plays the NA solely out of it's sense of patriotism. No way they'd ever take a particular stance out of self-interest.
Do you still think the NFL plays the Anthem to make money?
No, I think the NFL plays the NA solely out of it's sense of patriotism. No way they'd ever take a particular stance out of self-interest.
You never showed me your evidence for how they make money by playing the anthem. Or how WVU makes money by playing the anthem. Or how Bridgeport High School makes money by playing the anthem.
Why would you mention WVU and Bridgeport (two public institutions) in the same sentence with the NFL (a private business)?
That's why it's the responsibility of the person linking to the article to make sure the article says what the headline says it says instead of just blind linking.
Ill bet you she is related to American Fatbutt....that is typical of it's kind of trash.....cowards ...every one of them
Thats a good one......I'll wait to see how long it takes you to get your panties all wadded up WHEN some others on this board do the same. You're on the clock...tick...tick...tick....tick.That's why it's the responsibility of the person linking to the article to make sure the article says what the headline says it says instead of just blind linking.
OK you play editor Op2.
How would you word that "headline" calling attention to the fact that this chick found the attempted assassination or attempts of those being shot at avoiding getting killed "funny"?
Go ahead, write that headline so it's factually accurate.
The story is not accurate compared to the actual quote.
Please show us where she was wrong. This guy voted against a bill that attempted to keep guns out of the hands of those with mental problems.
There's no humor, the correct term would be irony, if there is any.You can see the humor or not see it but regardless the article makes clear what the generated the humor and it wasn't Scalise being shot.
For the dozenth time, THE HEADLINE DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT'S IN THE ARTICLE. Thus, your question is based on a false premise.
If I was an editor I'd write a headline THAT REFLECTED WHAT WAS IN THE ARTICLE INSTEAD OF A HEADLINE REFLECTING WHAT IS NOT IN THE ARTICLE.
For the dozenth time, THE HEADLINE DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT'S IN THE ARTICLE. Thus, your question is based on a false premise.
If I was an editor I'd write a headline THAT REFLECTED WHAT WAS IN THE ARTICLE INSTEAD OF A HEADLINE REFLECTING WHAT IS NOT IN THE ARTICLE.
You should vote to keep the democratic party out of the hands of people with mental diseases.
If I was an editor I'd write a headline THAT REFLECTED WHAT WAS IN THE ARTICLE INSTEAD OF A HEADLINE REFLECTING WHAT IS NOT IN THE ARTICLE.
OK Op2 I got it....now do it.
Atl....let me take a stab at it for our friend.....let me know what you think:OK Op2 I got it....now do it.
Atl....let me take a stab at it for our friend.....let me know what you think:
Congressman Deserved to get Shot Because he Supports Gun Rights
All they had to do was read what else she said.I think he can live with that. In fact I think most Leftists actually do think that!
Well done bornaneer. :clap:
Now we get to read all the Leftist posts denying what you just captured is the real Truth in that story and what they actually believe!
My friend, are you trying too hard to show how contrary you can be today? It has been a historical part of public offerings too long to attempt toanalyze now. Or, do you disagree with that too?Why would you mention WVU and Bridgeport (two public institutions) in the same sentence with the NFL (a private business)?
Never heard of him....who is he? Is he a Republican Party official?Yeah, wonder why we haven't seen anything about this tweet from a Republican.......
![]()
Never heard of him....who is he? Is he a Republican Party official?
Summary of what what you are saying--She is such an idiot and lacks the ability to craft a reasonable thought in the English languish that does not have within it so many ambiguities and confusing aspects that foils the ability of reasonable and intellectual folks to conclude what it is she might have intended to say. She should be replaced because she is incapable of performing the tasks associated with the role to which she is attached. What a dunce!Seriously now. She did not say the shooting was funny. She said the Republican reaction to the shooting was funny, as in strange. Poor choice of words on her part. Even realizing what she actually said, she still picked a poor topic to get into in this situation. But, in all fairness, in the article she did not say the shooting itself was funny. There is plenty to criticize in politics and journalism without needing to misstate what someone said. Unfounded sensationalism by either CNN or message board artists is not helpful to moving the country, or worthwhile discourse, forward.
Yeah, wonder why we haven't seen anything about this tweet from a Republican.......
![]()
It's because most sane Republicans I would say think what he says here is disgusting and wrong.
I'll sure say it!
I'll also say it is disgusting to shut down free speech, or refuse to let folks express themselves even if you disagree with what they're saying.
A pox on both houses!
I just find it funny how many disgustful and tasteless responses that a few posters on here find that are Democrats, but they are pretty silent when it's on the other foot.
Summary of what what you are saying--She is such an idiot and lacks the ability to craft a reasonable thought in the English languish that does not have within it so many ambiguities and confusing aspects that foils the ability of reasonable and intellectual folks to conclude what it is she might have intended to say. She should be replaced because she is incapable of performing the tasks associated with the role to which she is attached. What a dunce!
I'll call it out whenever I see it, whoever does it. What you posted that guy said is disgusting, and I find it hard to believe he'd actually be OK with doing what he suggests? (shooting people who try to block free speech)
Just because the Left attacks people over thoughts or words, doesn't mean we on the Right should join them.
I don't think they need any of our help being imbeciles.
Good grief.
"They"......you referring to just STUPID people saying STUPID things..........or Democrats?opcorn:
Baloney. I have challenged liberal politicians and policies plenty of times on this board. I have probably engaged in more FAIR AND THOUGHTFUL criticism of liberals than you have. You engage in nonstop criticism of liberals but there is little substance or thought behind it. You are EXACTLY like the far left nuts that do nothing except blindly bash the right.[/QUOTE
bologna..in a few short weeks tomatoes will be ripe..my first order of business will be a fried bologna sandwich @ tomato with mayo with a large wheat bun..yup
The headline is appropriate to the article, IMO. The headline has "was funny" whereas the article and the chairwoman's social media has "so funny" if we're looking for technicalities to excuse politicians of heartless, brainless, abhorrent behavior.Just to be clear, the headline is not what the article says.
Stupidity is not defined to any "party" my friend.
Nor any one person.
Stupid is as stupid does and stupid does what stupid is.
How about "Nebraska Democratic Party official won't resign after calling reactions to shooting at GOP baseball practice 'so funny.' Know how I came up with that? It's the headline on the article now. They've changed it.
I just find it funny how many disgustful and tasteless responses that a few posters on here find that are Democrats, but they are pretty silent when it's on the other foot.
Why am I not shocked you said that? Because you are a special kind of stupid.The story is not accurate compared to the actual quote.
Please show us where she was wrong. This guy voted against a bill that attempted to keep guns out of the hands of those with mental problems.
The headline is appropriate to the article, IMO. The headline has "was funny" whereas the article and the chairwoman's social media has "so funny" if we're looking for technicalities to excuse politicians of heartless, brainless, abhorrent behavior.
The headline is appropriate now because they've changed it. The initial headline was like the title of this thread, namely it said the Nebraska official though Scalise being shot was funny, even though the article didn't say that.
Yeah, watching the Congressmen describe Scalise as he tried to drag himself from the infield to the outfield to avoid more shots is extremely funny. Even the Dems realized it was a huge mistake and insensitive in the extreme and toxic to the Dems, which is why they asked for her resignation.
“Watching the congressman crying on live tv abt the trauma they experienced. Y is this so funny tho?
You look like a jackass in this whole thread trying to argue semantics while providing tacit approval for a deplorable comment made by the Democratic representative.You either knew the headline didn't reflect the article when you linked to it or else you posted an article that you hadn't read. Either way, you got caught and now are trying to change the subject. You're so anxious to post any damn thing that in any damn way can be used to promote a particular political view that you don't bother to closely examine the content.
You look like a jackass in this whole thread trying to argue semantics while providing tacit approval for a deplorable comment made by the Democratic representative.