Actually I understand completely. I don't think there is a conference alive that would not (for the most part) give a welcoming "standing O" to a new school. I just misunderstood what you would give them a "standing O" for -- like TAMU gave us the finger or something. I have no idea if TAMU has been being courted by the SEC or not, and honestly I don't care one way or another if they have been. It is just funny to hear them say it like it is a big threat or something. As for them being "good people" they are definitely better than UT, but they have their a-holes like every school does. TV markets -- the SEC already has a very strong hold in Texas -- especially with LSU -- but adding Texas A&M will add some depth to that. All of this is a given.
You need to read another post I just wrote about my thoughts on the SEC expansion. I said that I have always admired the SEC for honoring rivalries, history and tradition. I would actually hate to see the SEC "fix what ain't broke." The Big 12 is still relatively new when compared to other conferences so aside from a few specific rivalries, we do not have this great history. I wish we did. Clearly the schools in the Big 12 do NOT consider themselves a "family" in any way. Nebraska and Colorado already left, and Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State,Missouri, and Texas A&M have all threatened to leave at some time or another. That's why I have said along I would be happy if the conference dissolved. I would much prefer Texas Tech to be in a stable conference -- even if it is much smaller and lesser known -- with schools that respect each other and honor the commitment to one another. <div>
</div><div>I just wish collegefootballcould be about the game again. It is nothing but big business now, and it is sad to see.</div>