i'm tired of giving our football program over to guys looking for a retirement plan and bowden would be another.
New rumor up
- Thread starter saddawg
- Start date
I'll take a 90-49 underachiever any day. Because as I said before, there's no such thing as "underachieving" or "overachieving." There's only wins and losses. How you get there doesn't mean a damn thing. If our next coach can recruit talent good enough to win 100 games and wins "only" 90, we'll build a statue for him and name the stadium after him. Phil Fulmer is a classic example. He's generally considered to be a great recruiter but an average coach. Yet, he's one of the most successful overall coaches in SEC history.
<span style="font-weight: bold;">patdog</span> - The ONLY thing that matters is the bottom line. Wins and losses.
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Coach34</span> - yes, winning percentage thats what matters
Reading this, and other threads lately:
<span><span id="temp-1"><span><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IIlKiRPSNGA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" width="425" height="344" ></embed>
Forecast for the coming weeks:
</span></span><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Oc0Hj3h0nNo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" width="425" height="344" ></embed></span>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Coach34</span> - yes, winning percentage thats what matters
Reading this, and other threads lately:
<span><span id="temp-1"><span><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IIlKiRPSNGA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" width="425" height="344" ></embed>
Forecast for the coming weeks:
</span></span><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Oc0Hj3h0nNo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" width="425" height="344" ></embed></span>
If you can go from #9 to his record before being fired, at a school with Clemson's history, budget, stadium, in the ACC (no where near the SEC), then you would probably be average or less at State. No, I don't want to be average....I want more. In fact, I thought everyone on here wanted more than average. In all seriousness, how long would everyone here accept 6-6, 7-5, or 8-4 seasons before bitching that we can/should be winning 9-11 games a year? I don't want to win 6-8 games a year and be content. I want to win 9-12 games a year with a 7-5 being once or twice a decade. I don't know if we will ever achieve that goal but we damn sure won't unless we try. Hiring Tommy B would be safe but would not, in my opinion, be the guy to light the fire for recruits, alumni, students, etc. He is TOO SAFE of a hire.
Blast away at me.....
Blast away at me.....
First of all preseason rankings are a joke. Nobody knows how good these teams are going to be until they hit the field. All I know about Bowden is that he never had a losing record at Clemson and went to 8 bowls in 10 years. Forgive me for not minding if a coach with that track record is named our next coach
If you are wanting 9-12 wins a year at state you might want to take up hunting because you will never see that.6-7 wins a year is more likely to happen with a good coach.
Hell Georgia was pre-season #1 and you see how they finished. I am guessing none of you would want Richt here?