No more rainbow crosswalks….

[Weapon_X]

You are supporting removing things that are universally loved by the local demographics and promote positivity and love. You are an embodiment of hate and intolerance. Your judgement day will come

Supporting neutrality in public spaces isn’t hate... it’s sanity. Not everything “universally loved” by some gets to be plastered on public infrastructure. That’s not governance, that’s activism dressed as policy.

You don’t get to redefine disagreement as hatred. Wanting public roads to stay focused on safety and function over politics doesn’t make someone intolerant... it means they respect shared space. Real inclusion doesn’t require everyone to adopt your symbols to prove they care.

And invoking “judgment day” while throwing around labels like “embodiment of hate” just shows how emotionally unhinged your argument is. If your idea of love requires silencing, shaming, or threatening people who think differently, maybe you’re not the voice of tolerance you think you are.

 

[Weapon_X]

Can you imagine how disconnected from reality you have to be to make a statement like, “EVERYONE loves rainbow crosswalks in Atlanta”? How could you even think that sentence makes sense in the background of the election less than 8 months ago. No, everyone does not like them. And roads are for traffic and transportation, not political ideology. Why not paint MAGA everywhere, apparently EVERYONE loves that too, more people love MAGA than rainbow crosswalks I promise.

I live in Atlanta, and no... I don’t love or support the rainbow crosswalks. The idea that “everyone” does is just flat-out false and wildly disconnected from reality.

Not everyone supports having ideology... especially political and/or morally corrupt ... infrastructure messaging forced into shared public spaces. These crosswalks aren’t neutral. They’re not about traffic safety. They’re a political and cultural statement placed where it doesn’t belong.

 

[johnhugh]

Can you imagine how disconnected from reality you have to be to make a statement like, “EVERYONE loves rainbow crosswalks in Atlanta”? How could you even think that sentence makes sense in the background of the election less than 8 months ago. No, everyone does not like them. And roads are for traffic and transportation, not political ideology. Why not paint MAGA everywhere, apparently EVERYONE loves that too, more people love MAGA than rainbow crosswalks I promise.

Everyone in midtown Atlanta loves them

 

[MTTiger19]

Everyone in midtown Atlanta loves them

I guess everyone is about to be disappointed. Get over it.

 

[MTTiger19]

Is what the point? That what you’re claiming happened never actually happened? Your employer chose to enforce a vaccine mandate, you chose to take the vaccine. Plenty of employers delayed enforcing any vaccine requirements while the mandate was adjudicated. You should have just quit and found another job if you didn’t like it - isn’t that what conservatives are always telling employees who want better worker protections or higher pay? Stop being a victim and take responsibility for your own decisions.

And again, no evidence for any Democrat pursuing any criminal proceedings for any kind of speech. Just you making things up with no evidence at all.

Modern day conservatives in a nutshell:

View attachment 835162

https://www.wboy.com/news/west-virginia/pick-up-truck-driver-seen-doing-burnout-on-pride-mural-in-huntington-cited-by-police/

• Regulation of Social Media: Democrats have pushed for reforms that would expand the liability of social media platforms for harmful content, potentially including certain types of hate speech.
• Hate Crime Legislation: Democrats have been strong supporters of expanding federal hate crime laws, such as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, to include protections for a wider range of groups, like those based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
• Addressing Online Hate Speech: Some Democrats advocate for measures to address the spread of online hate speech, including potential laws requiring platforms to monitor and report it.

 

[johnhugh]

Calling folks you disagree with a “Nazi” or “the devil incarnate” doesn’t make you righteous... it makes you ridiculous.

This is the laziest form of political commentary. No substance, no policy critique, no understanding... just emotionally charged buzzwords meant to divide, not debate. The irony? The people screaming about “fascism” are the first ones to call for censorship, state control of speech, and forced ideological compliance.

You claim the “MAGA Nazi party” is destroying everything good... but you can’t list a single coherent example that doesn’t fall apart under scrutiny.

The truth is, when your side is out of ideas, you resort to labels. You don’t engage with the argument, because you don’t have one. You just default to name-calling, because that’s easier than thinking.

It’s not righteous. It’s not resistance. It’s just lazy tribalism wrapped in fake moral superiority.

How many times did you have to use a thesaurus to write this response? Flooring your reply with multi syllable words doesn’t help the substance of it, or lack thereof. You support a side that is fueled entirely by hate and fear. MAGA only aims to hurt the general public, it does not have the average Americans best interests at heart.

At the end of the day, Trump is simply a puppet for project 2025. I’ve posted a tracker for his progress in achieving P2025’s goals, and the administrations actions are a direct reflection of that god awful plan.

The frack at obsession with deporting immigrants is just the warm up to target people who disagree with him, just like the nazis did. So no, it’s not name-calling. It’s fact. I just hope you’re ready to come on here and admit that you were wrong and I was right when it happens

 

[johnhugh]

That left with vaccine mandates on private citizens to keep their jobs. If they can force vaccinations why can’t they tell you what goes on the street? We were warning you all along that you were overstepping. Now you pay.

Oh look, an open admission that the administration’s approach is entirely fueled by vengeance. “Now you pay”. LOL. What a bunch of offended snowflakes

 

[johnhugh]

Your questions is loaded with logical fallacies. But I digress...

The key distinction is intent and impact.

Clemson paw prints are non-political, locally unifying, and culturally symbolic. They represent a school, a community, and a team... similar to how cities use logos, banners, or mascots to build civic pride. They don’t push an ideology or political message. They don’t cause division. And most importantly, they are not used to signal moral, social, or political positions.

By contrast, rainbow crosswalks are directly tied to an ongoing sociopolitical movement, often used to make a public statement about identity, activism, and values. That inherently politicizes public infrastructure... something roads were not designed for.

If roads are about safety, clarity, and neutrality, then decorations that promote team spirit or local pride without pushing a political agenda are well within bounds.

Paw prints aren’t about changing minds. Political symbols are.

The rainbow crosswalks in midtown Atlanta are locally unifying as the city has an extremely high percentage of LGBT population. It’s the LGBT capital of the southeast.

 

[MTTiger19]

How many times did you have to use a thesaurus to write this response? Flooring your reply with multi syllable words doesn’t help the substance of it, or lack thereof. You support a side that is fueled entirely by hate and fear. MAGA only aims to hurt the general public, it does not have the average Americans best interests at heart.

At the end of the day, Trump is simply a puppet for project 2025. I’ve posted a tracker for his progress in achieving P2025’s goals, and the administrations actions are a direct reflection of that god awful plan.

The frack at obsession with deporting immigrants is just the warm up to target people who disagree with him, just like the nazis did. So no, it’s not name-calling. It’s fact. I just hope you’re ready to come on here and admit that you were wrong and I was right when it happens

Omg what an over reaction. They’re not letting 1% of the population vandalize public streets and now we live in nazi germany? lol. What a joke. Paint your house rainbow. Wear rainbow clothes. Paint your car rainbow. Why do we all have to participate in your debauchery? Wanna come watch me and my boys ploy a bunch of hot chicks and let us have a month and parade??? Good grief you’re insufferable.

 

[MTTiger19]

The rainbow crosswalks in midtown Atlanta are locally unifying as the city has an extremely high percentage of LGBT population. It’s the LGBT capital of the southeast.

No. One. Cares. There’s lots of white nationalists in Idaho. They don’t have nazi flags everywhere.

 

[johnhugh]

No. One. Cares. There’s lots of white nationalists in Idaho. They don’t have nazi flags everywhere.

Nor should they, as that is a message of hate. Rainbow crosswalks quite literally communicate a message of love and inclusivity, the teachings of Christ.

 

[MTTiger19]

Oh look, an open admission that the administration’s approach is entirely fueled by vengeance. “Now you pay”. LOL. What a bunch of offended snowflakes

Correct. We all warned you of government overreach and you loved it when it was your people making the rules. Now it’s not your people and you don’t like it. So yea, get over it. You reap what you sow.

Just wait until we get a guy with a little more vengeance, the lawfare you guys started is gonna be next. You will end up with a candidate that will be tried for a made up felony and soon. Maybe Tetia James would like some prison time. I can’t wait to watch yall squirm and cry then.

 

[MTTiger19]

Nor should they, as that is a message of hate. Rainbow crosswalks quite literally communicate a message of love and inclusivity, the teachings of Christ.

Great. Then quit crying. Christian’s don’t get to paint crosswalks either.

 

[Weapon_X]

The rainbow crosswalks in midtown Atlanta are locally unifying as the city has an extremely high percentage of LGBT population. It’s the LGBT capital of the southeast.

Calling rainbow crosswalks “unifying” because a specific demographic is heavily represented in one part of the city is the exact opposite of unity... it’s ideological favoritism dressed up as inclusion.

Yes, Midtown Atlanta has a large LGBT population. That doesn’t mean everyone in the city... LGBT or otherwise... wants political symbols painted onto public infrastructure. Crosswalks are for traffic, not activism.

If we start redefining “unity” as whatever makes one group feel seen while excluding or alienating others, then you’ve lost the meaning of unity altogether.

Try painting a pro-life symbol, a MAGA logo, or even a traditional family design on a public road and watch how quickly that “inclusive” energy disappears.

Atlanta is a city made up of many cultures, faiths, and beliefs. Public spaces should reflect shared purpose, not become canvases for political branding... no matter how popular one group might be in a zip code.

 

[MTTiger19]

Calling rainbow crosswalks “unifying” because a specific demographic is heavily represented in one part of the city is the exact opposite of unity... it’s ideological favoritism dressed up as inclusion.

Yes, Midtown Atlanta has a large LGBT population. That doesn’t mean everyone in the city... LGBT or otherwise... wants political symbols painted onto public infrastructure. Crosswalks are for traffic, not activism.

If we start redefining “unity” as whatever makes one group feel seen while excluding or alienating others, then you’ve lost the meaning of unity altogether.

Try painting a pro-life symbol, a MAGA logo, or even a traditional family design on a public road and watch how quickly that “inclusive” energy disappears.

Atlanta is a city made up of many cultures, faiths, and beliefs. Public spaces should reflect shared purpose, not become canvases for political branding... no matter how popular one group might be in a zip code.

No. EVERYONE loves them. Every single person. It’s just evil white, Christian men that are oppressing poor Johnny and his bf. Must be so hard living in a society where you can wear your kink outfits in parades with children. I can’t imagine how difficult this gay man’s life is. Oh the tragedy.

 

[fatpiggy]

So, no, you can’t name one single person who lost their job in the private sector as a result of a government mandate.

You got any links for Democrats saying they want to charge people with a crime for speech or “censor” free speech online?

They did censor free speech. See the twitter files.

 

[MTTiger19]

So, no, you can’t name one single person who lost their job in the private sector as a result of a government mandate.

You got any links for Democrats saying they want to charge people with a crime for speech or “censor” free speech online?

• Regulation of Social Media: Democrats have pushed for reforms that would expand the liability of social media platforms for harmful content, potentially including certain types of hate speech.
• Hate Crime Legislation: Democrats have been strong supporters of expanding federal hate crime laws, such as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, to include protections for a wider range of groups, like those based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
• Addressing Online Hate Speech: Some Democrats advocate for measures to address the spread of online hate speech, including potential laws requiring platforms to monitor and report it.

 

[Weapon_X]

How many times did you have to use a thesaurus to write this response? Flooring your reply with multi syllable words doesn’t help the substance of it, or lack thereof. You support a side that is fueled entirely by hate and fear. MAGA only aims to hurt the general public, it does not have the average Americans best interests at heart.

At the end of the day, Trump is simply a puppet for project 2025. I’ve posted a tracker for his progress in achieving P2025’s goals, and the administrations actions are a direct reflection of that god awful plan.

The frack at obsession with deporting immigrants is just the warm up to target people who disagree with him, just like the nazis did. So no, it’s not name-calling. It’s fact. I just hope you’re ready to come on here and admit that you were wrong and I was right when it happens

Mocking vocabulary instead of addressing the point? Classic straw man. Your real gripe is with Project 2025, so let’s set the record straight: Project 2025 wasn’t written by Trump... it’s a 900-page policy blueprint created by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Trump has publicly distanced himself from it .

Yes, many Trump-aligned officials have praised or implemented parts of it... but that’s not the same as Trump “being its puppet.” That’s like saying a coach is responsible for every play in a fan’s playbook.

Moving to your hysterical “Gestapo ICE” and “slippery slope to fascism” claims... no one’s rounding up legal citizens for speech. That’s projection. If you want to debate actual policy, let’s do it. But don’t hide behind hyperbole and emotional straw men while accusing the other side of authoritarianism.

 

[MTTiger19]

“The party of oppression, hate, and violent crime”? You might want to look in the mirror.

Oppression today comes almost entirely from the left... through cancel culture, censorship, thought policing, and mob intimidation. Disagree, and you’re silenced. Question the narrative, and you’re labeled a bigot. That’s not tolerance. That’s authoritarianism with a smiley-face sticker.

As for violent crime? The numbers don’t lie. The highest crime rates are in left-run cities. The looting, rioting, and destruction we’ve seen over the last few years weren’t carried out by conservatives. They were led by progressive activists and “protesters” funded and protected by the same side now pretending to stand for peace.

And let’s not pretend this is about morality. This is coming from the same ideology that fights for the right to murder children and permanently mutilate healthy minors in the name of “identity.” You don’t stand on moral high ground... you stand on a foundation of moral relativism, feelings over facts, and empty virtue signaling.

You don’t get to lecture anyone on hate or violence while defending the very ideologies that perpetuate both.

This deserves 1000 likes. Well done.

 

[MTTiger19]

Nor should they, as that is a message of hate. Rainbow crosswalks quite literally communicate a message of love and inclusivity, the teachings of Christ.

Have you not seen the people charged with vandalizing teslas. They’re all part of the rainbow flag. Every single one of them. That’s a message of hate. Pure hate. Trans people per capita are the most violent people in America. That group makes up 0.1% of our population but somehow has managed to be about 70% of school shooters and 95% of the people vandalizing Tesla’s.

 

[fatpiggy]

• Regulation of Social Media: Democrats have pushed for reforms that would expand the liability of social media platforms for harmful content, potentially including certain types of hate speech.
• Hate Crime Legislation: Democrats have been strong supporters of expanding federal hate crime laws, such as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, to include protections for a wider range of groups, like those based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
• Addressing Online Hate Speech: Some Democrats advocate for measures to address the spread of online hate speech, including potential laws requiring platforms to monitor and report it.

Barack Obama came out last week and said he wants to regulate social media. Same with Hillary.

They want to control speech because they can’t win on a level playing field.

 

[MTTiger19]

Barack Obama came out last week and said he wants to regulate social media. Same with Hillary.

They want to control speech because they can’t win on a level playing field.

No kidding. The fact these leftists act like this isn’t happening is hilarious.

 

[Weapon_X]

They did censor free speech. See the twitter files.

In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee this August, Zuckerberg confirmed that the senior officials in the Biden administration pressured Meta to suppress speech during COVID. But it wasn’t just “misinformation” being flagged. Much of what was censored included.

• Scientific opinions from credentialed doctors
• Accurate information that later turned out to be true
• Reasonable criticism of government policies

 

[Weapon_X]

Barack Obama came out last week and said he wants to regulate social media. Same with Hillary.

They want to control speech because they can’t win on a level playing field.

Never forget... these same leftists wanted to fine you, lock you in your home, force you into quarantine camps, take your children, and throw you in prison.

And now they want to call us the oppressive group. Hilarious.




https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...s_support_harsh_measures_against_unvaccinated

 

[MTTiger19]

In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee this August, Zuckerberg confirmed that the senior officials in the Biden administration pressured Meta to suppress speech during COVID. But it wasn’t just “misinformation” being flagged. Much of what was censored included.

• Scientific opinions from credentialed doctors
• Accurate information that later turned out to be true
• Reasonable criticism of government policies

They 1000% want to censor free speech. It’s always been about control for leftists. They need to control everything. The climate, who you hire, who is allowed in the country, who’s allowed to run for office, what sexes are protected, the list goes on. They are the party of authoritarian overreach and tyranny. Ironically anything that goes against their agenda and narrative is deemed authoritarian and hateful. It’s been the democrat MO for at least 30 years.

 

[Weapon_X]

They 1000% want to censor free speech. It’s always been about control for leftists. They need to control everything. The climate, who you hire, who is allowed in the country, who’s allowed to run for office, what sexes are protected, the list goes on. They are the party of authoritarian overreach and tyranny. Ironically anything that goes against their agenda and narrative is deemed authoritarian and hateful. It’s been the democrat MO for at least 30 years.

You’re absolutely right... and the facts back it up.

The left’s obsession with control isn’t a talking point, it’s a pattern:

• Free speech: From the Twitter Files to Zuckerberg’s own admissions, we’ve seen the Biden administration pressuring platforms to suppress dissent, even from credentialed doctors during COVID.
• Climate control: They push sweeping climate mandates that override individual choice and destroy industries... all while flying private jets to climate summits.
• Hiring and DEI: They demand hiring based on race, gender, and identity instead of merit, punishing those who won’t comply with woke quotas.
• Immigration: They want open borders, then label anyone who questions it as racist or xenophobic... while cities collapse under the weight of unchecked migration.
• Election interference: They tried to block Trump from ballots, used media and FBI collusion to bury the Hunter Biden laptop story, and then called that “protecting democracy.”
• Sex and biology: They redefine basic terms like man and woman, and if you disagree, you’re labeled hateful and dangerous.

Everything they disagree with is “misinformation” or “hate speech.” Everything they support is “progress.” It’s not about compassion... it’s about absolute narrative control.

The authoritarian playbook isn’t coming from the right. It’s been the Democrat MO for decades. The difference now? People are finally calling it out. Loudly. And unapologetically.

 

[dbjork6317]

• Regulation of Social Media: Democrats have pushed for reforms that would expand the liability of social media platforms for harmful content, potentially including certain types of hate speech.
• Hate Crime Legislation: Democrats have been strong supporters of expanding federal hate crime laws, such as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, to include protections for a wider range of groups, like those based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
• Addressing Online Hate Speech: Some Democrats advocate for measures to address the spread of online hate speech, including potential laws requiring platforms to monitor and report it.

So, no examples of democrats wanting to criminalize speech. Got it.

 

[Weapon_X]

So, no examples of democrats wanting to criminalize speech. Got it.

“No examples of Democrats trying to criminalize free speech”? That’s either willful ignorance or a selective memory. Here are just a few examples where the line was crossed... or came dangerously close:

• Disinformation Governance Board (2022): Under the Biden administration, DHS tried to set up a government board to define and fight “disinformation.” The public backlash was massive... because everyone could see it for what it was: a soft attempt to police speech. It was shut down for a reason.
• Twitter Files: Internal documents revealed direct pressure from the White House and federal agencies to censor legal speech online... scientific opinions, political views, even jokes. If the government tells a platform what speech to suppress, that’s state censorship by proxy.
• Misinformation regulation: Dem senators like Elizabeth Warren pushed to force Big Tech to remove so-called “misinformation”... which, at the time, included things like discussing natural immunity and questioning mask mandates. Many of those views turned out to be right.
• Speech on college campuses: Democrat-backed university policies routinely punish students for “offensive” or “non-inclusive” language... under vague, subjective standards. These are the exact environments where free speech should thrive, and they’ve become ideological echo chambers.
• Efforts to ban “hate speech” (which is still protected under the First Amendment) have gained traction in blue states and cities. The term is so loosely defined that it easily becomes a tool to silence dissent... not combat actual threats.

No, they haven’t passed a law saying “you can’t talk.” But they’re using policy, pressure, and platforms to undermine the First Amendment without having to rewrite it.

So yes... there are plenty of examples. You just have to be willing to see them.

 

[MTTiger19]

“No examples of Democrats trying to criminalize free speech”? That’s either willful ignorance or a selective memory. Here are just a few examples where the line was crossed... or came dangerously close:

• Disinformation Governance Board (2022): Under the Biden administration, DHS tried to set up a government board to define and fight “disinformation.” The public backlash was massive... because everyone could see it for what it was: a soft attempt to police speech. It was shut down for a reason.
• Twitter Files: Internal documents revealed direct pressure from the White House and federal agencies to censor legal speech online... scientific opinions, political views, even jokes. If the government tells a platform what speech to suppress, that’s state censorship by proxy.
• Misinformation regulation: Dem senators like Elizabeth Warren pushed to force Big Tech to remove so-called “misinformation”... which, at the time, included things like discussing natural immunity and questioning mask mandates. Many of those views turned out to be right.
• Speech on college campuses: Democrat-backed university policies routinely punish students for “offensive” or “non-inclusive” language... under vague, subjective standards. These are the exact environments where free speech should thrive, and they’ve become ideological echo chambers.
• Efforts to ban “hate speech” (which is still protected under the First Amendment) have gained traction in blue states and cities. The term is so loosely defined that it easily becomes a tool to silence dissent... not combat actual threats.

No, they haven’t passed a law saying “you can’t talk.” But they’re using policy, pressure, and platforms to undermine the First Amendment without having to rewrite it.

So yes... there are plenty of examples. You just have to be willing to see them.

Dude don’t waste your time with this crap. They know they’re wrong. They hate America. They hate themselves. They want to cast that dissatisfaction with themselves onto others. That’s all this is and will ever be. Trump broke their tiny brains in half and this is the aftermath. Let them wallow in their own self created misery.

 

[DW4_2016]

I read fine. You wished my wife and children died in a house fire. You’re a loser and a pos. You’re a worthless coward.

Where’s your other cheek?

 

[MTTiger19]

So, no examples of democrats wanting to criminalize speech. Got it.

Twitter. Files.
Check out Matt Taiibi’s reporting. Go back to crying about states rights that you don’t care about. TDS victim here.

 

[MTTiger19]

Where’s your other cheek?

Where’s your mommy with you Mac and cheese loser? Go play your ps5 dork, we know you don’t have anything else to do. You want my wife and children to die in a house fire right? That’s what you typed. So fuzk you and your cheeks. I’d give anything to meet you in person. You’re a pencil necked p-ssy.

 

[MTTiger19]

Where’s your other cheek?

You’re off the charts of either being a total loser or mentally challenged. The guy that typed out a message, wishing my wife and children died in a house fire, is challenging me on morality. What a dipshit loser lol.

 

[fatpiggy]

So, no examples of democrats wanting to criminalize speech. Got it.

Not wanting to, they actually did it.

Ask a doctor if they were allowed to speak freely during covid?

See twitter files.

see Obama see Hillary.

Censoring speech is a pillar of the party’s platform.

 

[johnhugh]

Mocking vocabulary instead of addressing the point? Classic straw man. Your real gripe is with Project 2025, so let’s set the record straight: Project 2025 wasn’t written by Trump... it’s a 900-page policy blueprint created by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Trump has publicly distanced himself from it .

Yes, many Trump-aligned officials have praised or implemented parts of it... but that’s not the same as Trump “being its puppet.” That’s like saying a coach is responsible for every play in a fan’s playbook.

Moving to your hysterical “Gestapo ICE” and “slippery slope to fascism” claims... no one’s rounding up legal citizens for speech. That’s projection. If you want to debate actual policy, let’s do it. But don’t hide behind hyperbole and emotional straw men while accusing the other side of authoritarianism.

Project 2025 Tracker

Track the progress on Project 2025

www.project2025.observer

Trump is a Project 2025 puppet. He will mindlessly sign whatever you put in front of him.

 

[Weapon_X]

Where’s your other cheek?

Telling Christians to “turn the other cheek” isn’t the mic-drop you think it is.

 

[Weapon_X]

Project 2025 Tracker

Track the progress on Project 2025

www.project2025.observer

Trump is a Project 2025 puppet. He will mindlessly sign whatever you put in front of him.

Calling Trump a “Project 2025 puppet” is dishonest, disingenuous, and completely detached from fact. Saying it over and over doesn’t make it true... it just reveals how desperate the left is to push a narrative that falls apart under even basic scrutiny.

That website you linked? It’s a hit piece designed to scare low-information and/or low IQ voters. It has no official connection to Trump, no original documentation... just cherry-picked summaries layered with opinion and fear tactics.

Claiming Trump will “mindlessly sign whatever is put in front of him” is lazy projection. You can dislike his policies, but pretending he’s a puppet with no agency is just willful ignorance. And it’s a great example of the liberal playbook: Lie. Repeat. Gaslight. Pretend it’s fact.

If you want to debate actual policies, do it. But stop pretending a think tank document equals a contract with Trump. It doesn’t... and you know it.

 

[johnhugh]

Calling Trump a “Project 2025 puppet” is dishonest, disingenuous, and completely detached from fact. Saying it over and over doesn’t make it true... it just reveals how desperate the left is to push a narrative that falls apart under even basic scrutiny.

That website you linked? It’s a hit piece designed to scare low-information and/or low IQ voters. It has no official connection to Trump, no original documentation... just cherry-picked summaries layered with opinion and fear tactics.

Claiming Trump will “mindlessly sign whatever is put in front of him” is lazy projection. You can dislike his policies, but pretending he’s a puppet with no agency is just willful ignorance. And it’s a great example of the liberal playbook: Lie. Repeat. Gaslight. Pretend it’s fact.

If you want to debate actual policies, do it. But stop pretending a think tank document equals a contract with Trump. It doesn’t... and you know it.

Deny deny deny. The MAGA way. Accuse the other side of doing what you do, then when exposed, deny deny deny. MAGA ilk are the number 1 threat to society

 

[MTTiger19]

Telling Christians to “turn the other cheek” isn’t the mic-drop you think it is.

He’s a p-ssy. He’s a little bitc/ that likes to pop that mouth off. He’s a coward. A loser. A vile, hate filled maggot. He’s worthless. People that act like him are the biggest losers on planet earth. They are nothing, have nothing and will never amount to anything. He’s pissed he sucks at life and has to live with mommy forever. This little p:ssy will be running to the moderators. Let me tag that little mommas boy bi/tch @DW4_2016. There big guy, there’s my cheek you punk bi/th.

 

[MTTiger19]

Project 2025 Tracker

Track the progress on Project 2025

www.project2025.observer

Trump is a Project 2025 puppet. He will mindlessly sign whatever you put in front of him.

At least he has a functioning brain.