Noah Fernandes commits

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,821
1,391
42
Simpson played PG this year, he better have had more assists than Montez who exclusively played the wing.
Simpson played limited time at PG and was on the wing out of position most of the year. True freshman and the best year we have had from a true freshman in over 20 years. Only thing that limited his production was the coaching staff going to him too late in the year.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,821
1,391
42
I think Simpson will be a key and get plenty of play time. Maybe as a super sixth man providing a spark (like Jacob Young)….maybe as a starter.
Simpson is starting at PG Noah will be in the Jacob young role next year. His health and size will limit him. If he’s hot on any given night his minutes will be extended
 

bitnez

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
6,069
6,303
113
Simpson is starting at PG Noah will be in the Jacob young role next year. His health and size will limit him. If he’s hot on any given night his minutes will be extended

One thing is clear - Noah didn’t come here because he thought he’d be behind Simpson. Pike will make the call but IMO Simpson will be the 6th man and he’s perfect for the role. Shoot first ball handler who can come in and look to score.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,821
1,391
42
Guaranteed more wide open looks for Spencer…GUARANTEED
Hopefully that’s true ! Your losing Caleb and potentially Paul two non shooters who other teams did not have to guard amd could help on Cliff and Cam.

Paul pounding the air out of the ball until there was 5 secs on the clock led to stagnant, no space, and no movement.
With improved shooting GG and explosive get to the rim DS / NF there will be more space. Our opponents will now have to double our PG’s which will lead to open looks for Cam and space for Cliff.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,821
1,391
42
One thing is clear - Noah didn’t come here because he thought he’d be behind Simpson. Pike will make the call but IMO Simpson will be the 6th man and he’s perfect for the role. Shoot first ball handler who can come in and look to score.
Will see! Great problem to have for us!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bitnez

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,821
1,391
42
No offense but I really hate these type questions. If these guys can’t handle some competition (from a 1 year transfer no less) then they don’t belong.

If this program is going to get better we need more talent (particularly at positions of need which this is). If these kids want to WIN and be the BEST they can be they should welcome the talent/competition. If not….later!!!
Agreed! Hopefully Pike plays the best players regardless of names or time on the banks. He made that mistake this year and hopefully he has learned.
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
One thing is clear - Noah didn’t come here because he thought he’d be behind Simpson. Pike will make the call but IMO Simpson will be the 6th man and he’s perfect for the role. Shoot first ball handler who can come in and look to score.

Agree that Fernandes didn't come expecting to be a backup - but no one knows what the year will bring as it progresses. Hopefully we'll have good competition for minutes, and no "default minutes" where we can't take a guy off the floor because of a big dropoff to his backup.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,635
10,741
78
Simpson had 50 assists this year, with 31 turnovers. Mathis' high water mark was 38 assists as a sophomore, also with 31 turnovers. Simpson has shown better distribution skills as a freshman than Mathis did in any year on the banks.

That’s a fair point, but it should be noted that Tez was never expected to play point nor even given the opportunity to bring up the ball so you can’t really compare assist numbers straight up. Also both averaged between 1-2 assists per game. The small sample size indicates there wasn’t a material difference in distribution impact from their frosh seasons. Tez is taller at 6-4 and plays bigger than his height. Better rebounder. Simpson came in the better ball handler. The point is those saying Simpson has shown way more potential that frosh Tez did his first year have a short memory.
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
That’s a fair point, but it should be noted that Tez was never expected to play point nor even given the opportunity to bring up the ball so you can’t really compare assist numbers straight up. Also both averaged between 1-2 assists per game. The small sample size indicates there wasn’t a material difference in distribution impact from their frosh seasons. Tez is taller at 6-4 and plays bigger than his height. Better rebounder. Simpson came in the better ball handler. The point is those saying Simpson has shown way more potential that frosh Tez did his first year have a short memory.
They're also at different positions. Simpson is a combo guard in the 1/2 role, and Mathis was more of a scoring wing in the 2/3 role. Hard to compare the two of them, but there really isn't an equivalency there.

I'd say Simpson is being asked to perform the role that Jacob Young held, moreso than Mathis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arizona Knight

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,635
10,741
78
They're also at different positions. Simpson is a combo guard in the 1/2 role, and Mathis was more of a scoring wing in the 2/3 role. Hard to compare the two of them, but there really isn't an equivalency there.

I'd say Simpson is being asked to perform the role that Jacob Young held, moreso than Mathis.
The similarities - both of them contribute most through transition and pentration. Both tend to force things as frosh. But understandable for frosh. Tez continued to force throughout his career.
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
The similarities - both of them contribute most through transition and pentration. Both tend to force things as frosh. But understandable for frosh. Tez continued to force throughout his career.
I think Simpson has a little bit more pull up game in his arsenal, rather than having to get to the rim as much as Mathis. He's also better with the ball in his hands, and more willing to give it up when there's nothing there.

I agree he does force things at times, but he was also the only guy able to dribble penetrate. Next year he'll also have Fernandes, so not as much pressure to force into the lane by himself. Really interested to see how he progresses next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pdabs

Eagleton95.99

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
7,511
6,428
113
Go back and look at his frosh stats. 6 games scoring 16+ points in one season from a freshman is potential. He played out of control, yes, but at the time you would’ve chalked it up to him being a frosh. The problem was it continued in future years.

Tez would’ve been a big help to last year’s team. We needed transition players. I do agree Derek is a better ball handler, but I still think think they are similar types of players and ultimately Derek will play a slasher role and not be our primary point. Time will tell.
He was a classic Jekyll and Hyde player. Any night you didn't know which Montez would show up. Part of that was matchups as he didn't have a flexible style, he just did his thing. But when that thing worked he was great. Perfect sparkplug off the bench. He just didn't want to play that role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,635
10,741
78
I think Simpson has a little bit more pull up game in his arsenal, rather than having to get to the rim as much as Mathis. He's also better with the ball in his hands, and more willing to give it up when there's nothing there.

I agree he does force things at times, but he was also the only guy able to dribble penetrate. Next year he'll also have Fernandes, so not as much pressure to force into the lane by himself. Really interested to see how he progresses next year.

He does have a better handle than Tez but Tez also wasn’t in the running for PG. He’s bigger and a better rebounder making it easier to slide to 2-3 as not as great of an outside shooter. Derek is better from charity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
Go back and look at his frosh stats. 6 games scoring 16+ points in one season from a freshman is potential. He played out of control, yes, but at the time you would’ve chalked it up to him being a frosh. The problem was it continued in future years.

Tez would’ve been a big help to last year’s team. We needed transition players. I do agree Derek is a better ball handler, but I still think think they are similar types of players and ultimately Derek will play a slasher role and not be our primary point. Time will tell.
OK, I don't remember that but yes, that is potential. My memory leads me to out of control, play ground ball, end to end getting stuffed, and the infamous airball layup. Those are all hard to erase from my memory and I think based on his most recent Rutgers production, he would have been a liability if he played the same way. Simpson is smooth, blows by defenders, and creates for himself. I hope those good times continue with Derek.
 

rubigtimenow

All-Conference
Mar 4, 2015
2,257
2,915
0
Tez definitely won us a few games as the best player in those games. I’m not looking up which ones but I know it was multiple.
I appreciated what he did here. Started LOTS of games in a row for us. At the end it was time to move on.
(Oh my his sometimes/often knuckle ball 3 point shot was … too much to watch)
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest


He’s actually more like Geo than Simpson is. Simpson is explosive with nice length so his upside is tremendous.

Fair take that I can see after watching this. A poor mans geo. Shorter and less athletic version.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
15,730
13,701
0
Tez led the league in falling down whenever he missed a shot, but I loved his toughness, especially on the defensive end.

Simpson made errors of aggression, which is a positive for a freshman, imo. He also strikes me as someone who will continually improve. And for a smaller guy he also showed toughness on D.
 

Arizona Knight

All-American
Jun 25, 2001
16,672
9,929
56
Tez led the league in falling down whenever he missed a shot, but I loved his toughness, especially on the defensive end.

Simpson made errors of aggression, which is a positive for a freshman, imo. He also strikes me as someone who will continually improve. And for a smaller guy he also showed toughness on D.

Every single layup attempt resulted in Tez on the deck. I’ve never seen anything like it.
 

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,539
10,699
103
Simpson had 50 assists this year, with 31 turnovers. Mathis' high water mark was 38 assists as a sophomore, also with 31 turnovers. Simpson has shown better distribution skills as a freshman than Mathis did in any year on the banks.
Yup!!
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
Hopefully that’s true ! Your losing Caleb and potentially Paul two non shooters who other teams did not have to guard amd could help on Cliff and Cam.

Paul pounding the air out of the ball until there was 5 secs on the clock led to stagnant, no space, and no movement.
With improved shooting GG and explosive get to the rim DS / NF there will be more space. Our opponents will now have to double our PG’s which will lead to open looks for Cam and space for Cliff.
Good post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,539
10,699
103
Simpson played PG this year, he better have had more assists than Montez who exclusively played the wing.
Wings can pass to more open teammates for a better shot, right? Unfortunately, that wasn’t a Montez strength.
 
Last edited: