Official visits remaining and filling out the class

nebcountry

Senior
Oct 29, 2013
1,878
801
0
as of now. According to Rivals these are the current official visits, TOS only has 3 listed (shown with * below). This list doesn't include current commits or previous visits.

Elijah Blades CB 1/27/17 Florida
Deommodore Lenoir ATH 1/20/17
Tyler Shelvin DT 1/13/17 LSU
Isaac Slade-Matautia ILB 12/9/16
Chuck Filiaga* OT 12/9/16
Gavin Holmes* WR 12/9/16
Corrion Ballard* S In Progress (not shown on Rivals, per TOS)

The staff has brought in a tremendous number of recruits this year. So how do we fill in the rest of this class? The most recent Riley quote has us taking about 6 more recruits. Earlier reports quoted 22-23 recruits. 18 senior eligibility + Derrion Grim vacated is 19, so 21 factors in 2 more leaving with eligibility on the table. As can be seen below, we currently have zero DB commits and I would be hard-pressed to believe the staff intentionally wants a dead year for DB's. We are still offering more RB's, and certainly one of our already offered ATH's may be targetted for RB/DB. The breakdown of the current committed recruits is as follows:

WR - 2
TE - 2
RB - 1 (FB)
QB - 1
OL - 3
LB - 2
DT - 2
DE - 2

In a perfect world, where do we want our 6 to fill (or more if that's your belief). My guess: 2 WR, 2 DB, 1 RB (ATH), and 1 LB. Will/is the staff "encouraging" more departures from the current roster to allow room for more? Will the staff "encourage" current commits to flip to somewhere else if we land some of these top targets? The B1G allows oversigning 3 with cause and documentation, because "I wanted to" doesn't appear to be acceptable. It's definitely an interesting recruiting cycle, and February is approaching. So, what's everbody thinking?
 
  • Like
Reactions: c3ntral08

big red23

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2003
9,930
1,223
113
as of now. According to Rivals these are the current official visits, TOS only has 3 listed (shown with * below). This list doesn't include current commits or previous visits.

Elijah Blades CB 1/27/17 Florida
Deommodore Lenoir ATH 1/20/17
Tyler Shelvin DT 1/13/17 LSU
Isaac Slade-Matautia ILB 12/9/16
Chuck Filiaga* OT 12/9/16
Gavin Holmes* WR 12/9/16
Corrion Ballard* S In Progress (not shown on Rivals, per TOS)

The staff has brought in a tremendous number of recruits this year. So how do we fill in the rest of this class? The most recent Riley quote has us taking about 6 more recruits. Earlier reports quoted 22-23 recruits. 18 senior eligibility + Derrion Grim vacated is 19, so 21 factors in 2 more leaving with eligibility on the table. As can be seen below, we currently have zero DB commits and I would be hard-pressed to believe the staff intentionally wants a dead year for DB's. We are still offering more RB's, and certainly one of our already offered ATH's may be targetted for RB/DB. The breakdown of the current committed recruits is as follows:

WR - 2
TE - 2
RB - 1 (FB)
QB - 1
OL - 3
LB - 2
DT - 2
DE - 2

In a perfect world, where do we want our 6 to fill (or more if that's your belief). My guess: 2 WR, 2 DB, 1 RB (ATH), and 1 LB. Will/is the staff "encouraging" more departures from the current roster to allow room for more? Will the staff "encourage" current commits to flip to somewhere else if we land some of these top targets? The B1G allows oversigning 3 with cause and documentation, because "I wanted to" doesn't appear to be acceptable. It's definitely an interesting recruiting cycle, and February is approaching. So, what's everbody thinking?
They posted a tweet from Lenoir on the halftime twitter feed on the Big screen at the South Dakota basketball game. I can't remember what it said word for word, but it was something like "There is nothing like a degree from the University of Nebraska".
 
  • Like
Reactions: nebcountry

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
I'm thinking 3 WR's. They'll take Calvin and Lewis and we seem to lead for Gavin. They also seem to be in front of at least 4 DB's (Johnson, Blades, Graham, and maybe Lenoir) with Cotton and Curl floating around (also Darnay).

Supposing we win the lottery, we may have to do some significant shuffling to get a lot of these talented guys on board, whether its asking them to play different positions (Johnson-RB or Blades-Safety) or finding some attrition.

I believe the last couple crystal balls have Slade coming to us.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
191,552
17,644
113
I still think we will take:

0-2 DT: Danniels and Shelvin are takes no matter what, right?
0-1 LB: Slade-Matuatia or bust?
2+ CB: Got to make room for Graham, Lenoir, Johnson, Blades and Holmes if they want N.
1-2 Safety: The JUCO visiting and a HS safety?
1 RB: Who knows at this point, pretty disappointing so far
2 WR: Calvin and Lewis, with Holmes as a backup plan? Or do we take all 3?
0-2 OL: Sarrell and/or Filiaga or bust?

It will be interesting because we are in on so many guys you just have to take/make room for, but we really don't know how many we will land.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
I still think we will take:

0-2 DT: Danniels and Shelvin are takes no matter what, right?
0-1 LB: Slade-Matuatia or bust?
2+ CB: Got to make room for Graham, Lenoir, Johnson, Blades and Holmes if they want N.
1-2 Safety: The JUCO visiting and a HS safety?
1 RB: Who knows at this point, pretty disappointing so far
2 WR: Calvin and Lewis, with Holmes as a backup plan? Or do we take all 3?
0-2 OL: Sarrell and/or Filiaga or bust?

It will be interesting because we are in on so many guys you just have to take/make room for, but we really don't know how many we will land.

Daniels is basically N and would fill the expected class for DL. Shelvin would be a surprise flip and a "you make room for". We won't be without a RB, it'll be Johnson at worst. I believe we'd take all three WRs. Slade I think we lead for, but we are still interested in Drew Ward as a backup. IMO, the only real question is figuring out the defensive backfield and who is playing where depending on how many of those DB's want N (Ballard, Lenoir, Johnson, Graham, Blades, Cotton, Curl, etc etc.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Headcard

big red23

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2003
9,930
1,223
113
I still think we will take:

0-2 DT: Danniels and Shelvin are takes no matter what, right?
0-1 LB: Slade-Matuatia or bust?
2+ CB: Got to make room for Graham, Lenoir, Johnson, Blades and Holmes if they want N.
1-2 Safety: The JUCO visiting and a HS safety?
1 RB: Who knows at this point, pretty disappointing so far
2 WR: Calvin and Lewis, with Holmes as a backup plan? Or do we take all 3?
0-2 OL: Sarrell and/or Filiaga or bust?

It will be interesting because we are in on so many guys you just have to take/make room for, but we really don't know how many we will land.
Remaining targets...

DT - Damien Daniels 3* (Number 22 DT in the Country)
Tyler Shelvin 5* (Number 2 DT in the country) ----

OT - Foster Sarrell 5* (Number 1 OT in the country)
Chuck Filiaga 4* (Number 16 OT in the country)

DB - Darnay Holmes 5* (Number 3 DB in the country)
Elijah Blades 4* (Number 7 DB in the Country)
Thomas Graham 4* (Number 11 DB in the country)
Deommodore Lenoir 4*(Number 2 ATH in the country)
Greg Johnson 4* (Number 4 ATH in the country)

LB - Isaac Slade 4* (Number 11 LB in the country)

WR - Joseph Lewis 5* (Number 3 WR in the country)
Jamire Calvin 4* (Number 36 WR in the country)
Gavin Holmes 3* (Number 75 WR in the country)

I also don't think we should just completely rule out Jaylon Redd

That is

5* = 4
4* = 7
3* = 2
 

huskernorm

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2004
436
1,283
93
I'd include RBs:

Stephen Carr 4*
Nathan Tilford 4*
Darrian Felix 3*

We are going to take an RB it seems. Will be interesting to see who.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
We are still in it with Carr and Tilford?

There was a quote in a Arizona football publication right after the D. Williams hire that the NU staff felt confident that it could flip Carr with Williams in tow.It went further to say that we might put Tilford on the back burner a little (which was a positive for UA). Whether that's blowing smoke or not, it was quite the eye popping statement.
 
Last edited:
May 2, 2005
94,699
70,101
0
as of now. According to Rivals these are the current official visits, TOS only has 3 listed (shown with * below). This list doesn't include current commits or previous visits.

Elijah Blades CB 1/27/17 Florida
Deommodore Lenoir ATH 1/20/17
Tyler Shelvin DT 1/13/17 LSU
Isaac Slade-Matautia ILB 12/9/16
Chuck Filiaga* OT 12/9/16
Gavin Holmes* WR 12/9/16
Corrion Ballard* S In Progress (not shown on Rivals, per TOS)

The staff has brought in a tremendous number of recruits this year. So how do we fill in the rest of this class? The most recent Riley quote has us taking about 6 more recruits. Earlier reports quoted 22-23 recruits. 18 senior eligibility + Derrion Grim vacated is 19, so 21 factors in 2 more leaving with eligibility on the table. As can be seen below, we currently have zero DB commits and I would be hard-pressed to believe the staff intentionally wants a dead year for DB's. We are still offering more RB's, and certainly one of our already offered ATH's may be targetted for RB/DB. The breakdown of the current committed recruits is as follows:

WR - 2
TE - 2
RB - 1 (FB)
QB - 1
OL - 3
LB - 2
DT - 2
DE - 2

In a perfect world, where do we want our 6 to fill (or more if that's your belief). My guess: 2 WR, 2 DB, 1 RB (ATH), and 1 LB. Will/is the staff "encouraging" more departures from the current roster to allow room for more? Will the staff "encourage" current commits to flip to somewhere else if we land some of these top targets? The B1G allows oversigning 3 with cause and documentation, because "I wanted to" doesn't appear to be acceptable. It's definitely an interesting recruiting cycle, and February is approaching. So, what's everbody thinking?
Nebraska has 20 scholarship seniors that will be leaving and that counts Grimm's scholly that was given to a walk on senior(Nabity?). There are 4 players from the junior class that could be "processed" but I'm not sure that is something they would do or not since there are only 14 scholarship juniors and would leave us with only 10 graduating seniors.
 

RealTucoSalamanca

All-American
Aug 18, 2016
15,926
9,785
113
Kaz - I agree with your 20 number, but I still show only 84 scholarships allocated, as my numbers only have 13 scholarship juniors who am I missing?

Taylor
DPE
Hannon
D. Johnson
Knevel
Natter
M Newby
Weber
K Williams (safety)
C Jones
B Joseph
Kalu
Drew Brown.
 

GretnaShawn

All-Conference
Sep 28, 2010
6,329
4,182
78
Kaz - I agree with your 20 number, but I still show only 84 scholarships allocated, as my numbers only have 13 scholarship juniors who am I missing?

Taylor
DPE
Hannon
D. Johnson
Knevel
Natter
M Newby
Weber
K Williams (safety)
C Jones
B Joseph
Kalu
Drew Brown.


Look at the misses in the line class....


Hannon - Miss
D. Johnson - Miss
Knevel - Hard to call him a hit when he gets beat out by a Sophomore walk-on...
Natter - Miss?
 

RealTucoSalamanca

All-American
Aug 18, 2016
15,926
9,785
113
2-WR
0 - OL unless both Filiaga and Sarell want in
1- DL unless Shelvin flips
1- LB
4 DB

The staff must know they have players leaving because they are hot and heavy after 11-13 players with only room for 7 right now.
 

c3ntral08

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2008
4,370
1,815
0
Look at the misses in the line class....


Hannon - Miss
D. Johnson - Miss
Knevel - Hard to call him a hit when he gets beat out by a Sophomore walk-on...
Natter - Miss?

Yeah poor recruiting by the last staff. I would put Corey Whittaker in there as well. He's done basically nothing since he's been here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GretnaShawn

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
2-WR
0 - OL unless both Filiaga and Sarell want in
1- DL unless Shelvin flips
1- LB
4 DB

The staff must know they have players leaving because they are hot and heavy after 11-13 players with only room for 7 right now.

Arguably the four highest rated are low probability though.
 

TwinsRRUs_rivals79748

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2011
6,818
4,193
0

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
191,552
17,644
113
Arguably the four highest rated are low probability though.

Three of the four (Sarell, Holmes and Shelvin) would be considered low probability, imo. But who do you consider the 4th? Because it looks like we are in very good shape with 5-star Jospeh Lewis and Top 100 players Thomas Graham and Greg Johnson.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
Three of the four (Sarell, Holmes and Shelvin) would be considered low probability, imo. But who do you consider the 4th? Because it looks like we are in very good shape with 5-star Jospeh Lewis and Top 100 players Thomas Graham and Greg Johnson.

I really meant to say 3-4. We're not probably going to be looking at a full 13 in his range. We're probably trying to squeeze 9-10 into 7 when the dust settles. Filiaga I think is a low probability but I really would like to have him because its a position of need (this make him important even though I know he's not a Lewis or Graham).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Headcard

nebcountry

Senior
Oct 29, 2013
1,878
801
0
Nebraska has 20 scholarship seniors that will be leaving and that counts Grimm's scholly that was given to a walk on senior(Nabity?). There are 4 players from the junior class that could be "processed" but I'm not sure that is something they would do or not since there are only 14 scholarship juniors and would leave us with only 10 graduating seniors.

I was going by the Herald's scholarship distribution list. Their list still accounts for Grim as a freshman. There is eligibility year, academic year, diploma in-hand, transfers, etc that can be factored into the discussion on who is leaving. Based on the Herald's list of 18 senior eligibility, a recognition of some players with diploma in-hand or transfers, and however Grim's scholarship is counted, Riley is quoted as saying about 6 more recruits. No matter how you slice it, it's about 6 more guys. I'm not approaching this from a fortune teller standpoint, it's more what do I know or think at this point in time.

I started this thread because I think I read that we offered two more new RB's this week. That indicates an urgency to fill a spot at RB. And we have high profile recruits expected to visit. Riley says we'll take about 6 more. It got me thinking. Landing a bunch of guys is great, but there's a price to pay, it's one of the limited number of scholarships. There's only so many scholarships to give. Don't take me wrongly, I'm NOT saying who we should or shouldn't take.

This question is "how do we fill out this class"?

Edit: Someone's answer could be 23 or 25 recruits total, but we get there with attrition.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
I was going by the Herald's scholarship distribution list. Their list still accounts for Grim as a freshman. There is eligibility year, academic year, diploma in-hand, transfers, etc that can be factored into the discussion on who is leaving. Based on the Herald's list of 18 senior eligibility, a recognition of some players with diploma in-hand or transfers, and however Grim's scholarship is counted, Riley is quoted as saying about 6 more recruits. No matter how you slice it, it's about 6 more guys. I'm not approaching this from a fortune teller standpoint, it's more what do I know or think at this point in time.

I started this thread because I think I read that we offered two more new RB's this week. That indicates an urgency to fill a spot at RB. And we have high profile recruits expected to visit. Riley says we'll take about 6 more. It got me thinking. Landing a bunch of guys is great, but there's a price to pay, it's one of the limited number of scholarships. There's only so many scholarships to give. Don't take me wrongly, I'm NOT saying who we should or shouldn't take.

This question is "how do we fill out this class"?

According to Clouse's interview the other night on 1620, he thought Riley throwing out 22 was a "floor" and not necessarily the target number or ceiling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SOHusker11

TwinsRRUs_rivals79748

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2011
6,818
4,193
0
Nebraska has 20 scholarship seniors that will be leaving and that counts Grimm's scholly that was given to a walk on senior(Nabity?). There are 4 players from the junior class that could be "processed" but I'm not sure that is something they would do or not since there are only 14 scholarship juniors and would leave us with only 10 graduating seniors.

I could see them doing it the easy way and "processing" those that redshirted and have already spent 4 years in the program by saying 'we gave you 4 years to get a degree. You are on track to graduate this spring, so thank you for your contribution to our team.'

BUT you are right. If you pile on the recruits in this class after processing 4 players that would be seniors, next year's recruiting class would start at 10 (time to be VERY picky!!).

Looking at the 2018 seniors, most of those players have been playing, so I wouldn't consider hardly any of them the processing type. you wouldn't be able to "process" out more than a couple at the most (Newell and King?)(unless a career ending injury occurred).

It's hard to have a class with 20 recruits every year when you redshirt 80% of each class.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
I was going by the Herald's scholarship distribution list. Their list still accounts for Grim as a freshman. There is eligibility year, academic year, diploma in-hand, transfers, etc that can be factored into the discussion on who is leaving. Based on the Herald's list of 18 senior eligibility, a recognition of some players with diploma in-hand or transfers, and however Grim's scholarship is counted, Riley is quoted as saying about 6 more recruits. No matter how you slice it, it's about 6 more guys. I'm not approaching this from a fortune teller standpoint, it's more what do I know or think at this point in time.

I started this thread because I think I read that we offered two more new RB's this week. That indicates an urgency to fill a spot at RB. And we have high profile recruits expected to visit. Riley says we'll take about 6 more. It got me thinking. Landing a bunch of guys is great, but there's a price to pay, it's one of the limited number of scholarships. There's only so many scholarships to give. Don't take me wrongly, I'm NOT saying who we should or shouldn't take.

This question is "how do we fill out this class"?

Edit: Someone's answer could be 23 or 25 recruits total, but we get there with attrition.

I think Tuco's distribution is probably the most "right". He's missing a RB, but one of the DB's (Johnson) can be the RB, and we'd still have three great DB's (which was our target number believe).

Gavin Holmes is probably the most expendable recruit IMO and I think Tuco shows it in his breakdown with 2 WR.

At this point, besides Daniels, any further action on the OL/DL is a nice surprise that you ask some folks to move on for.
 

RealTucoSalamanca

All-American
Aug 18, 2016
15,926
9,785
113
I think Tuco's distribution is probably the most "right". He's missing a RB, but one of the DB's (Johnson) can be the RB, and we'd still have three great DB's (which was our target number believe).

Gavin Holmes is probably the most expendable recruit IMO and I think Tuco shows it in his breakdown with 2 WR.

At this point, besides Daniels, any further action on the OL/DL is a nice surprise that you ask some folks to move on for.


Thanks. I am not sure they take a RB just to take one. If they can get Carr or another stud I think they take him but I don't see this staff as one who will take for the sake of taking. If they like Johnson as a RB, I could see it and wouldn't mind that decision.

But to repeat, the staff must have a decent idea there will be attrition and that it won't be at RB because the best I can see, Davis is moving on to 2018 class. I have to wonder if they think they can survive with 3 for 2017 season and get a couple RB in 2018. Or maybe they have an ace in the hole that is a big secret.
 

nebcountry

Senior
Oct 29, 2013
1,878
801
0
According to Clouse's interview the other night on 1620, he thought Riley throwing out 22 was a "floor" and not necessarily the target number or ceiling.

At different times, I've read 21, 22, and 23, with "about 21" as the latest number (or 22 using Clouse's number). I don't know how many we'll actually take. We have what appears to be a large number of targets, and "no" I don't see us getting everybody. The all star games are coming up, other commitment announcements are coming up, and we'll have a clearer picture of possibilities.

At a certain point, we (actually the coaching staff) may have some hard decisions to make. The staff has talked about roster managment, and that's really what this discussion is about in my book.
 

DudznSudz

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2016
2,155
1,581
0
Im reading that Holmes is out. I think someone just posted his dad just said its between UCLA, USC, tOSU, and Michigan. I hope he goes to UCLA, personally, as it seems like a good fit for the kid.

Having said all of that, I am fairly confident we are at least 50% likely to land the following:

-Greg Johnson (4* Athlete, could literally play anything we wanted except line)

-Damion Daniels (3*/4*, DT, big ol' hoss, we take him and we have 5 DL commits, which is incredible)

-Joseph Lewis (5*, WR, taking us because of immediate playing time, 3 year plan to the NFL, and Greg Johnson is his high school team mate)

-Jamire Calvin (3*/4*, WR, we've been high for him for a while, I see him pulling the trigger for us. I also think this is the last WR we take, as he would make 4 total and easily the most talented lineup of any Nebraska has ever had.)

-Demmodoire Lenoir (4*, Athlete/DB, I think we get him simply because we almost got him in the first place, and he just de-committed from Oregon).

-Rahyme Johnson (4*, LB, I think we get him because he really wanted to play with Lenoir and we've been on his list for a while anyway.)

-Isaac Slade-Matautia (4*, LB, I think we land either him or R. Johnson, possibly both.)

I think we make room for between 1 and 3 extra players in addition to the above, depending on if Foster Sarrell, Tyler Shelvin, or a position of great need becomes available. I think we take less than 25 total, but only just; I wouldn't be shocked if we took even up to 24 with a little attrition.

Also, if we landed most or all of the above, we would likely be a top 10 class. That says a LOT compared to barely cracking the top 25, which was pretty normal for us for years. Also also, if the above comes true, watch for us to be a young, daaaaangerous team in 2018 when our schedule is murder.
 

DudznSudz

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2016
2,155
1,581
0
Oh, I almost forgot, it is also entirely possible that we land Trajon Cotton too. That would put us at 23 total, and unless it were Shelvin or Sarrell, I think that would mark the end of our class.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
At different times, I've read 21, 22, and 23, with "about 21" as the latest number (or 22 using Clouse's number). I don't know how many we'll actually take. We have what appears to be a large number of targets, and "no" I don't see us getting everybody. The all star games are coming up, other commitment announcements are coming up, and we'll have a clearer picture of possibilities.

At a certain point, we (actually the coaching staff) may have some hard decisions to make. The staff has talked about roster managment, and that's really what this discussion is about in my book.

I don't think the staff is going to hesitate much. The reason they are pursuing some 13 kids is because if we do win the lottery, its already been decided to make room for them through attrition (guys like Sarrell and Shelvin, Filiaga, and 4DBs). If a few of these kids go the other way (as is probably the case for at least a few), then he doesn't have to worry about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nebcountry

maplesyrup95

All-Conference
Nov 26, 2014
1,675
1,064
0
Im reading that Holmes is out. I think someone just posted his dad just said its between UCLA, USC, tOSU, and Michigan. I hope he goes to UCLA, personally, as it seems like a good fit for the kid.

Having said all of that, I am fairly confident we are at least 50% likely to land the following:

-Greg Johnson (4* Athlete, could literally play anything we wanted except line)

-Damion Daniels (3*/4*, DT, big ol' hoss, we take him and we have 5 DL commits, which is incredible)

-Joseph Lewis (5*, WR, taking us because of immediate playing time, 3 year plan to the NFL, and Greg Johnson is his high school team mate)

-Jamire Calvin (3*/4*, WR, we've been high for him for a while, I see him pulling the trigger for us. I also think this is the last WR we take, as he would make 4 total and easily the most talented lineup of any Nebraska has ever had.)

-Demmodoire Lenoir (4*, Athlete/DB, I think we get him simply because we almost got him in the first place, and he just de-committed from Oregon).

-Rahyme Johnson (4*, LB, I think we get him because he really wanted to play with Lenoir and we've been on his list for a while anyway.)

-Isaac Slade-Matautia (4*, LB, I think we land either him or R. Johnson, possibly both.)

I think we make room for between 1 and 3 extra players in addition to the above, depending on if Foster Sarrell, Tyler Shelvin, or a position of great need becomes available. I think we take less than 25 total, but only just; I wouldn't be shocked if we took even up to 24 with a little attrition.

Also, if we landed most or all of the above, we would likely be a top 10 class. That says a LOT compared to barely cracking the top 25, which was pretty normal for us for years. Also also, if the above comes true, watch for us to be a young, daaaaangerous team in 2018 when our schedule is murder.

Nice list and breakdown. I agree with all of the above. The Donté Williams hire is already looking to be a good chess move by Riley. Dude is really in tune with talent on the west coast and in the southwest. I think it's going to bode well come February.
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
Thanks. I am not sure they take a RB just to take one. If they can get Carr or another stud I think they take him but I don't see this staff as one who will take for the sake of taking. If they like Johnson as a RB, I could see it and wouldn't mind that decision.

But to repeat, the staff must have a decent idea there will be attrition and that it won't be at RB because the best I can see, Davis is moving on to 2018 class. I have to wonder if they think they can survive with 3 for 2017 season and get a couple RB in 2018. Or maybe they have an ace in the hole that is a big secret.

We had the big argument before. Davis IMO is about the worst recruiter on staff (but there are plenty of pretty dang good recruiters so I'm not sure he's absolutely terrible without having met the man). He's at the bottom of a pretty decent pile.

Our strategy this year has been exceedingly weird. We almost exclusive pursued targets who were long shots, and only lately have we offered basically Oregon's targets as their program was in flux. (Although according to a Arizona football writer after we hired Williams, apparently the staff feels they have a good chance of flipping Carr and will leave Tilford alone for the time being, so maybe the coaches are less pessimistic about their "long shot" strategy than we are).
 
Last edited:

HuskerLLM

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2004
45,801
1,671
0
Im reading that Holmes is out. I think someone just posted his dad just said its between UCLA, USC, tOSU, and Michigan. I hope he goes to UCLA, personally, as it seems like a good fit for the kid.

Having said all of that, I am fairly confident we are at least 50% likely to land the following:

-Greg Johnson (4* Athlete, could literally play anything we wanted except line)

-Damion Daniels (3*/4*, DT, big ol' hoss, we take him and we have 5 DL commits, which is incredible)

-Joseph Lewis (5*, WR, taking us because of immediate playing time, 3 year plan to the NFL, and Greg Johnson is his high school team mate)

-Jamire Calvin (3*/4*, WR, we've been high for him for a while, I see him pulling the trigger for us. I also think this is the last WR we take, as he would make 4 total and easily the most talented lineup of any Nebraska has ever had.)

-Demmodoire Lenoir (4*, Athlete/DB, I think we get him simply because we almost got him in the first place, and he just de-committed from Oregon).

-Rahyme Johnson (4*, LB, I think we get him because he really wanted to play with Lenoir and we've been on his list for a while anyway.)

-Isaac Slade-Matautia (4*, LB, I think we land either him or R. Johnson, possibly both.)

I think we make room for between 1 and 3 extra players in addition to the above, depending on if Foster Sarrell, Tyler Shelvin, or a position of great need becomes available. I think we take less than 25 total, but only just; I wouldn't be shocked if we took even up to 24 with a little attrition.

Also, if we landed most or all of the above, we would likely be a top 10 class. That says a LOT compared to barely cracking the top 25, which was pretty normal for us for years. Also also, if the above comes true, watch for us to be a young, daaaaangerous team in 2018 when our schedule is murder.

I have been told NU moved on from Rayhme. Might circle back but ISM and TN commit from Georgia are higher priorities as of now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morgan747

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
I have been told NU moved on from Rayhme. Might circle back but ISM and TN commit from Georgia are higher priorities as of now.

I have also heard, this, but also more generally "the Salesian kids" although I think that was aimed more at Pickett and Rayhme than Lenoir.

Clearly, Williams is all over Lenoir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerLLM

big red23

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2003
9,930
1,223
113
2-WR
0 - OL unless both Filiaga and Sarell want in
1- DL unless Shelvin flips
1- LB
4 DB

The staff must know they have players leaving because they are hot and heavy after 11-13 players with only room for 7 right now.

2 - WR Lewis and Calvin
1 - OL Filiaga or Sarell
1 - DL Daniels or Shelvin
1 - RB ?
3 - DB Lenoir, Johnson and Thomas

That will put us at 23... Greg Johnson could be Running Back, so that makes room for Darnay Holmes :)
 

jflores

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2004
8,993
2,783
0
2 - WR Lewis and Calvin
1 - OL Filiaga or Sarell
1 - DL Daniels or Shelvin
1 - RB ?
3 - DB Lenoir, Johnson and Thomas

That will put us at 23... Greg Johnson could be Running Back, so that makes room for Darnay Holmes :)

Holmes is out. But it could be Blades. And you forgot Graham.
 

big red23

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2003
9,930
1,223
113
2 - WR Lewis and Calvin
1 - OL Filiaga or Sarell
1 - DL Daniels or Shelvin
1 - RB ?
3 - DB Lenoir, Johnson and Thomas

We will finish with 23 recruits. I believe
Holmes is out. But it could be Blades. And you forgot Graham.
Thomas = Graham - Grammar Mistake

If our class finished with

Joseph Lewis
Jamire Calvin
Foster Sarrell
Tyler Shelvin
Thomas Graham
Deommodore Lenoir
Greg Johnson
Elijah Blades

This will go down as the best recruiting class I have ever witnessed since joining this site back in 2003

The crazy thing is... There is a possibility that it could happen!!!
 
Last edited:

jeans15

Heisman
Feb 23, 2011
253,663
59,077
0
Sale them on being the group that takes Nebraska back to the promise land.