as of now. According to Rivals these are the current official visits, TOS only has 3 listed (shown with * below). This list doesn't include current commits or previous visits.
Elijah Blades CB 1/27/17 Florida
Deommodore Lenoir ATH 1/20/17
Tyler Shelvin DT 1/13/17 LSU
Isaac Slade-Matautia ILB 12/9/16
Chuck Filiaga* OT 12/9/16
Gavin Holmes* WR 12/9/16
Corrion Ballard* S In Progress (not shown on Rivals, per TOS)
The staff has brought in a tremendous number of recruits this year. So how do we fill in the rest of this class? The most recent Riley quote has us taking about 6 more recruits. Earlier reports quoted 22-23 recruits. 18 senior eligibility + Derrion Grim vacated is 19, so 21 factors in 2 more leaving with eligibility on the table. As can be seen below, we currently have zero DB commits and I would be hard-pressed to believe the staff intentionally wants a dead year for DB's. We are still offering more RB's, and certainly one of our already offered ATH's may be targetted for RB/DB. The breakdown of the current committed recruits is as follows:
WR - 2
TE - 2
RB - 1 (FB)
QB - 1
OL - 3
LB - 2
DT - 2
DE - 2
In a perfect world, where do we want our 6 to fill (or more if that's your belief). My guess: 2 WR, 2 DB, 1 RB (ATH), and 1 LB. Will/is the staff "encouraging" more departures from the current roster to allow room for more? Will the staff "encourage" current commits to flip to somewhere else if we land some of these top targets? The B1G allows oversigning 3 with cause and documentation, because "I wanted to" doesn't appear to be acceptable. It's definitely an interesting recruiting cycle, and February is approaching. So, what's everbody thinking?
Elijah Blades CB 1/27/17 Florida
Deommodore Lenoir ATH 1/20/17
Tyler Shelvin DT 1/13/17 LSU
Isaac Slade-Matautia ILB 12/9/16
Chuck Filiaga* OT 12/9/16
Gavin Holmes* WR 12/9/16
Corrion Ballard* S In Progress (not shown on Rivals, per TOS)
The staff has brought in a tremendous number of recruits this year. So how do we fill in the rest of this class? The most recent Riley quote has us taking about 6 more recruits. Earlier reports quoted 22-23 recruits. 18 senior eligibility + Derrion Grim vacated is 19, so 21 factors in 2 more leaving with eligibility on the table. As can be seen below, we currently have zero DB commits and I would be hard-pressed to believe the staff intentionally wants a dead year for DB's. We are still offering more RB's, and certainly one of our already offered ATH's may be targetted for RB/DB. The breakdown of the current committed recruits is as follows:
WR - 2
TE - 2
RB - 1 (FB)
QB - 1
OL - 3
LB - 2
DT - 2
DE - 2
In a perfect world, where do we want our 6 to fill (or more if that's your belief). My guess: 2 WR, 2 DB, 1 RB (ATH), and 1 LB. Will/is the staff "encouraging" more departures from the current roster to allow room for more? Will the staff "encourage" current commits to flip to somewhere else if we land some of these top targets? The B1G allows oversigning 3 with cause and documentation, because "I wanted to" doesn't appear to be acceptable. It's definitely an interesting recruiting cycle, and February is approaching. So, what's everbody thinking?