Ohio State and Michigan in Double OT. OSU wins. Controversial spot

YourPublicEnemy

All-American
Jul 28, 2016
3,831
5,785
0
Michigan down to fourth and goal and connect on an amazing TD pass in the back of the endzone.

Double OT.
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,337
0
Committee hates this result. Now they either have to piss off the Pac 12 (if Washington looks good and wins again next week) or leave out the 2 loss Big Ten champ in Wisconsin (most likely) or Penn State.

If I'm Bama I prefer to play the 3rd or 4th best team in the Big Ten over Washington. I think Bama rolls any of their 3 potential opponents though.
 

ZakkW

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
4,637
4,815
113
It does raise the question - can a player's forward momentum be stopped by his own teammate. Because Barrett was stopped and sent backward by one of his O-Lineman's ***.
 
Jan 3, 2003
885
210
0
It does raise the question - can a player's forward momentum be stopped by his own teammate. Because Barrett was stopped and sent backward by one of his O-Lineman's ***.
Ha! Good point! :)

I think there was a Michigan defender that made contact with him at the same time too. Although, it was certainly his teammates *** that stopped his forward progress, more so than the Michigan defender.
 

YourPublicEnemy

All-American
Jul 28, 2016
3,831
5,785
0
No way that call is made if that game is outside the horse shoe. Such BS. Ohio State always benefits from such BS officiating.
 

YourPublicEnemy

All-American
Jul 28, 2016
3,831
5,785
0
Not sure how anyone can watch the replay and objectively say that he did or didn't make it. It was very close and the replay didn't show conclusively one way or the other. That's why the play stood as called on the field.

My issue is that the call on the field was just automatically given to him because as soon as I watched it, I knew he didn't get it. The call should have been turnover and then review that crap.
 
Jan 3, 2003
885
210
0
My issue is that the call on the field was just automatically given to him because as soon as I watched it, I knew he didn't get it. The call should have been turnover and then review that crap.
How can you say you knew he didn't get it watching real time when the slow motion replays, from multiple angles, were inconclusive? It was just one of those close calls that would have people complaining either way they had called it on the field.
 

OHIO COLONEL

Heisman
Feb 11, 2009
14,803
59,401
0
Just saw a clip on halftime of the Bama game of Harbaugh in his press conference. To say he's hot would be an understatement.
 

UKUGA

Heisman
Jan 26, 2007
18,505
26,810
0
Not sure how anyone can watch the replay and objectively say that he did or didn't make it. It was very close and the replay didn't show conclusively one way or the other. That's why the play stood as called on the field.

Which is why the "conservative" call would be to reward the defense for a great play, and force the replay to override you?

Could you have overturned the spot based on replay if they had spotted him short?
 
Jan 3, 2003
885
210
0
It's not 100% conclusive but pretty close. Hard to argue against this picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkPftw

ScrewDuke1

Hall of Famer
Jul 29, 2016
41,107
152,857
113
I think the call was right. It was tough, but the replay showed nothing to overturn it.
 

Nubb16

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
128,714
10,038
67
I hate OSU, but the one good outcome is that Jim Harbaugh is related to Tom Crean and Crean and his family are likely devastated over the outcome.
 

rick64

Heisman
Jan 25, 2007
23,394
31,162
113
Didn't see anything on the replay to change the call. Questionable calls in every game. Harbaugh cost his team didn't he with an unsportsmanlike penalty?
 

MirageSmack

Junior
Dec 17, 2006
12,150
326
0
I hate forward progress. I think you should be able to pick up and ippenent and carry him back to your end zone if you can. Football was better before forward progress.
 

BluTide

Redshirt
Oct 25, 2005
56
12
0
OSU very well may get left out of playoff. Washington rolled over a ranked foe today. Clemson rolled today. Washington will have to beat a ranked foe (USC or Colorado) in the PAC 10 championship game. If they win, they're in ......... Penn State blew out a MSU team that OSU struggled with last week. If Penn State wins the big 10 title over Wisconsin you have to take them over OSU by virtue of winning the conference and winning head to head versus OSU. Bama is in. If Clemson wins ACC title they're in .
 
Last edited:

ktbug

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
14,502
2,828
0
OSU missed two easy fgs. Mich threw a pick six, another int that gave OSU great field position, and fumbled the snap inside the osu 5, yet Harbaugh is blaming the refs............
If you think he was a foot short, you have no business ever questioning another call.
BTW, I was pulling for Mich, I hate OSU!
 
Apr 1, 2013
16,636
16,619
0
OSU very well may get left out of playoff. Washington rolled over a ranked foe today. Clemson rolled today. Washington will have to beat a ranked foe (USC or Colorado) in the PAC 10 championship game. If they win, they're in ......... Penn State blew out a MSU team that OSU struggled with last week. If Penn State wins the big 10 title over Wisconsin you have to take them over OSU by virtue of winning the conference and winning head to head versus OSU. Bama is in. If Clemson wins ACC title they're in .
OSU is not going be left out. Which is ******** because 1. They didn't get the first down 2. Now they can sit home during the Champ game weekend and not risk a loss or any injuries.
 

BluTide

Redshirt
Oct 25, 2005
56
12
0
If Penn State wins big 10 and Washington wins PAC 10 then OSU is out. Mark it down. OSU has not passed the so called "eye test" the last 2 weeks. And remember the committee is not made of the amalyat like Herbstreit and Galloway .