Ole Miss schedule is getting a little more respectful each Saturday.

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,119
15,435
113
Week one they only had two games to worry with and we were all laughing at their schedule but since the first week rather then having LSU and Alabama to worry with, they now have Tenn and Auburn. I think Auburn is for real and Tenn Defense will keep Ole Miss off balance. There is one more game they might have to be worry with and that game will be played Thursday. Ole miss has sure looked slopy the first two games and they better get it together fast.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,119
15,435
113
Week one they only had two games to worry with and we were all laughing at their schedule but since the first week rather then having LSU and Alabama to worry with, they now have Tenn and Auburn. I think Auburn is for real and Tenn Defense will keep Ole Miss off balance. There is one more game they might have to be worry with and that game will be played Thursday. Ole miss has sure looked slopy the first two games and they better get it together fast.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,119
15,435
113
Week one they only had two games to worry with and we were all laughing at their schedule but since the first week rather then having LSU and Alabama to worry with, they now have Tenn and Auburn. I think Auburn is for real and Tenn Defense will keep Ole Miss off balance. There is one more game they might have to be worry with and that game will be played Thursday. Ole miss has sure looked slopy the first two games and they better get it together fast.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
They have tons of talent. They are going to beat SC by 10 or more Thursday</p>

Sloppy in their first 2 games? They have beaten the piss out of both opponents. Stop with the Mississippi envy. Oger-moron was a dynamic recruiter but a super ****** head coach. Nutt is a good coach who walked into a gold mine.</p>

Let it play out</p>
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
Coach34 said:
They have tons of talent. They are going to beat SC by 10 or more Thursday</p>

Sloppy in their first 2 games? They have beaten the piss out of both opponents. Stop with the Mississippi envy. Oger-moron was a dynamic recruiter but a super ****** head coach. Nutt is a good coach who walked into a gold mine.</p>

Let it play out</p>

I hope you are right about Thursday, but I have a hard time seeing us walk in and win by double digits.
 

olemissbydamn

Redshirt
May 24, 2006
1,479
0
0
a couple of weeks ago.

Preseason dick measuring contest over schedules is stupid. Until some games are played, we don't know who will be contenders and pretenders.

Going into 2008, nobody feared OM on their schedule. Auburn was supposed to be good. LSU was supposed to be strong. Tennessee was coming off a 10-4 East championship. MSU was coming off a bowl. Vandy had a losing 2007 season. Not to mention some of the nonconference teams that were better or worse than expected.
 

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
You really can't ever tell with the SEC schedule but Ole Miss' non conference schedule is freaking shameful. Stevie Wonder could see that those teams were going to suck and suck hard.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
Hanmudog said:
You really can't ever tell with the SEC schedule but Ole Miss' non conference schedule is freaking shameful. Stevie Wonder could see that those teams were going to suck and suck hard.

Yea, and that's the best part about it. I'd rather play 4 gimmes every year out of conference. Unfortunately, we just lucked into this OOC schedule, and Boone will be trying to schedule more difficult teams in the future.

If you ask me there is no shame in playing a weak OOC schedule. You can call it shameful. I would call it smart, if it were done on purpose.
 

olemissbydamn

Redshirt
May 24, 2006
1,479
0
0
Hanmudog said:
You really can't ever tell with the SEC schedule but Ole Miss' non conference schedule is freaking shameful. Stevie Wonder could see that those teams were going to suck and suck hard.

Hey now! Don't take it out on us because you're going to go 1-3 OOC. Take it out on your athletic department.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,348
25,537
113
Any SEC schedule is going to be plenty tough. No need to add more tough games than you play already. At the end of the day, nobody really gives a **** who you played. They only care how many you won.
 

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
How do you luck into playing 2 non D-1 opponents? You can play those any day of the week. Also, if Ole Miss were truly the number 4 team in America then why the heck would you be glad about playing a weak non conference schedule?
Going back several years, I used to hate playing those type teams during the good Sherrill years. It was boring as hell.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
Hanmudog said:
How do you luck into playing 2 non D-1 opponents? You can play those any day of the week. Also, if Ole Miss were truly the number 4 team in America then why the heck would you be glad about playing a weak non conference schedule?
Going back several years, I used to hate playing those type teams during the good Sherrill years. It was boring as hell.

Well, we apparently were trying to find a D-1 team for that 4th and final slot on the schedule, and we couldn't get anyone because we waited to late, so that's why I say we lucked into the easy schedule. It wasn't part of the plan. They tried to get a more difficult 4th opponent, but they couldn't get one late in the game, so we were lucky to end up with the easier schedule.

I'd prefer not to play two 1AA schools most years just because it means you have to win 7 to be bowl eligible. Honestly though if I could change one thing about our schedule, I'd replace Northern Arizona with Western Kentucky (1A cupcake), and I'd have had the game last week instead of November 7. In other words, I'd still want another cupcake, but just give me one that I can count toward bowl eligibility. That's the only difference.

But that's it. How is our schedule hurting us exactly? As of today, if we were to go undefeated, there is only 1 team that's ahead of us in both polls that could also go undefeated. So I don't see how the schedule would keep us out of a national title game, hypothetically of course.

Outside of that, rather than having Houston or Georgia Tech in the middle of our schedule that gives us an extra 2 games to have to be on top of our game, we get a chance to take a little bit of a mental break in the middle of the SEC schedule with UAB and Northern Arizona. If you ask me, that's a plus, not a negative for a team trying to put together a good run in conference play. On top of that, 10-2 with a weak OOC schedule is better for your bowl selection standing than 8-4 or 9-3 with a difficult OOC schedule if you're an SEC team.

I'm assuming we're going to win at least 7 games this year, and if we do that, then that eliminates the possibility of the OOC schedule keeping us from being bowl eligible.

And what does the weak OOC schedule have to do with us being No. 4 in the polls? If we are truly No. 4 in the country, then I'm even happier about the OOC schedule, because it allows us to not have to be at the top of our game every week in trying to maintain that position. Ask USC what it's like to play a tough OOC opponent (OSU) and then have to come back and play a conference opponent. Do you think USC would've lost to Washington if they had played Nevada the week before instead of OSU?
 

DowntownDawg

Redshirt
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
...who could very well whip that rebel *** on Halloween, although some OM fans find that offensive, coming from a State fan.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,348
25,537
113
WVU gave that game to them. And we helped their offense tremendously by playing so passivly on defense.
 

Columbus Dawg

Redshirt
Feb 23, 2008
1,642
0
0
I disagree. I think AU is a pretty good football team. They have good coaches in place and they are a veteran team made up of highly rated recruiting classes.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,348
25,537
113
I know for sure they're way better than us or Vandy. But they're not good enough to beat Mississippi or any of the other upper SEC teams.
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,940
5,810
113
of a concern on Ole Miss's schedule than it was this summer.

Malzahn is the real deal. They ran all over us. When they couldn't run on WV, they threw all over them. Their D is not what it has been, but its definitely solid.

If they played today, I think AU would be favored by the home field advantage of 3.
 

DowntownDawg

Redshirt
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
...and we can debate whether or not they are "that good." At the very least, they are an average SEC team, and Ole Miss has to play them on the road. They are pretty explosive offensively, but seem average to suspect defensively. However, this statement is

<table summary="user post and replies"> <tbody class="expandable post reply odd 8Dog" id="post-id-3.2.1.4"> <tr> <td class="th poster-name firstcol"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
<table summary="user post and replies"> <tbody class="expandable post reply odd 8Dog" id="post-id-3.2.1.4"> <tr> <td class="th poster-name firstcol">
</td> <td class="th post-subject"><span class="post-title">As of now, the Auburn game is far more...</span></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>of a concern on Ole Miss's schedule than it was this summer.
100 percent factual.
 

Married to a Dog

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2008
143
0
0
we really did luck into our schedule. We had TCU scheduled for September 12th, but they backed out to go play Virginia. We would have played them with 31 players reportedly suffering from the flu.

That would have sucked.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
maroonmania said:
Ole Miss has what is probably the easiest OOC schedule this year in the history of the world!

Go take a look at Texas Tech's OOC schedule from last year. It was as easy, if not easier, yet no one complained when they jumped to No. 2 in the polls after beating Texas. OOC schedule is way overblown in college football. It means almost nothing. I say the weaker the better. If you can still sell tickets, it's not going to hurt you to play a weak OOC schedule if you're an SEC school.

For quick reference, Texas Tech played Eastern Washington (1AA, finished 6-5 and tied for 3rd in Big Sky), at Nevada (7-6, tied for 2nd in WAC), SMU (1-11, 12th in CUSA), and Massachusetts (1AA, finished 7-5 and 7th in the CAA).
 

olemissbydamn

Redshirt
May 24, 2006
1,479
0
0
DowntownDawg said:
...and we can debate whether or not they are "that good." At the very least, they are an average SEC team, and Ole Miss has to play them on the road. They are pretty explosive offensively, but seem average to suspect defensively. However, this statement is

<table summary="user post and replies"> <tbody class="expandable post reply odd 8Dog" id="post-id-3.2.1.4"> <tr> <td class="th poster-name firstcol"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
<table summary="user post and replies"> <tbody class="expandable post reply odd 8Dog" id="post-id-3.2.1.4"> <tr> <td class="th poster-name firstcol">
</td> <td class="th post-subject"><span class="post-title">As of now, the Auburn game is far more...</span></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>of a concern on Ole Miss's schedule than it was this summer.
100 percent factual.
Coming off a rare SEC win, you guys would rather talk **** about OM possibly losing a game the last day of October.

We may lose to SC, then to Bama, and again to Auburn, but it can be no where near as depressing as the strong possiblity that your 2 of your 3 wins for the season are already in the rear view mirror.

Searching for a potential loss or two is better than trying to find 2 more victories on your schedule to finish 4-8.
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,940
5,810
113
this was a good discussion with actual substance. Its not **** talk. We were simply analyzing the schedule. Like every thread, it has some bad posts, but I think you are overreacting and ironically, using it as a chance to take a shot at State.
 

DowntownDawg

Redshirt
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
...about our season. Our schedule is the toughest in school history, and we don't have the talent to do anything anyway, However, for most of us, it's going to be interesting to see what happens with our team, and if we can improve over the course of the season. We are in a classic rebuilding year: first year coach, new system, and a lot of young guys playing. Thus far, even though we have some big time holes, football season is a helluva lot more enjoyable than it's been in the last 5 years. What else is there to talk about? We suck. We knew we were going to suck. We are showing improvement from the Croom era that might not be reflected at all in our win-loss record.

What's funny is that you are so extremely defensive about State fans talking about ya'll losing. Thanks for the obligatory "Why don't you talk about your ****** football team" post. Really, why does it matter what we are discussing on here? It's of great interest to me. I am geographically closer to OM than I am State. You are our hated rival. Your season impacts our future prospects in recruiting. Hell yes, I want you to lose and lose often. And it's a worthy discussion because you guys are the story, and like you say, we're probably not going bowling.

So unless the mods want us to stop Ole Miss's season, then quit acting like I kicked your toddler for saying that Auburn might beat you guys. They have a chance to at home. And so does SC. Am I prohibited from discussing that too?
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
DowntownDawg said:
So unless the mods want us to stop Ole Miss's season, then quit acting like I kicked your toddler for saying that Auburn might beat you guys. They have a chance to at home. And so does SC. Am I prohibited from discussing that too?

I have no problem with you saying that, because I'd say the same things. I said the other day I feel like this is the order of our most dangerous games left, or at least the order I would put for most likely to lose:

1a. Bama
1b. South Carolina
3. Auburn
4. Arkansas
5. LSU
6. Tennessee
7. MSU
8. Vandy (flipped MSU and Vandy from my last post)

So yes, Auburn is definitely up there. That could be a tough game for us, though watching them only beat WVU by 11 at home after 6 WVU turnovers made them look a lot less scary to me. If any team gives you 6 turnovers, you should win and win fairly easily.
 

DowntownDawg

Redshirt
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
...you are not the one getting all uptight about the discussion, so thanks for that.

For some reason, I see you guys beating Bama. Very good d-line vs. a rookie quarterback. You'll be at home in an unbelievable atmosphere. I think the slip-ups will come on the road, and for that reason Auburn and USC are the most dangerous. Your series with LSU has been pretty erratic as well, so anything could happen there.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,348
25,537
113
And if you didn't have a signed deal, you didn't have a deal (as we found out when our 2-for-1 "deal" with Central Michigan suddenly turned into a Central Michigan road game at Georgia).
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,119
15,435
113
Oxford Godfrey said:
We had a deal in place with TCU, who walked away at the very last minute for Virginia.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">I'm not in the know but you make it sound like, you should have pony up a little money.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> You guys spend money on other BS why not the money to keep TCU on Schedule.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> It could be your AD might have used it as an excuse to get out of that tough game. It make sense, if you know you are going to pre season ranked why risk that ranking by playing someone who could beat you. I say you guys were chicken. You wanted out of that game and you found the excuse. You can use that excuse if you want over on your board and tell each other how great you are, but don't think your weak *** schedule will not be challenge over here.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> This is a Miss State message board and you are more then welcome to visit and post but don't get your vaginas hurt when Ole Miss get's slammed.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"></p>

</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">As far as the thread title goes, three weeks ago your entire schedule was weak.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> You did not pay GA or Florida.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> Auburn and Tenn. were thought to be weak.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> Now that's change.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> Yes your OOC schedule is still for teams that only a ****** team would play but your conference schedule is getting more respectable.</p>
 

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
Why are you on an MSU board telling us that we should be talking about how much our team sucks? Shouldn't you be on Nafoom discussing microbrews and whether or not to wear sockless loafers with red corduroys?
 

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,097
742
113
pointing out TT's weak OOC schedule last year and complaining about it. However, that being said, Nevada from last year trumps anybody that Ole Miss is playing this year.
 

whatever.sixpack

Redshirt
Jun 27, 2008
911
0
0
patdog said:
WVU gave that game to them. And we helped their offense tremendously by playing so passivly on defense.
Pat you also said Mallett was overrated. He's legit, and Auburn is too.
Teams like Auburn and TN still have talent, they just had one bad year of coaching disaster. Ole Miss finishes strong one year and you guys now think they have more talent than teams like Auburn and UT and will walk over them?
I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Auburn and UT beat Ole Miss, and I also think both of those teams could beat South Carolina. UT is a QB away from being really strong
 

8dog

All-American
Feb 23, 2008
13,940
5,810
113
someone said its not luck when you schedule 2 1AA's, but he was noting that that wasn't done on purpose. They really had a game lined up.