the damn reasons for bitching about Stans will change as soon as one wears out. One moment bitching about Stans chewing someone out, the next bitching because Stats won't chew someone out because his boys are in the huddle.
patdog said:It's that the chances of us hiring someone better than him are pretty low (like 20% or less chance). Look at your favorite basketball school Arkansas. They fired someone with similar results as Stans and now 2 years later they're 1-10. Do you honestly think we have more to offer a basketball coach than Arkansas does? And if they couldn't hire someone better than who they had, why are you so sure we would?
patdog said:And it's not exactly like he took over a program that was in great shape himself. We were coming off of 2 straight losing seasons. We'll continue to agree to disagree, but I will say this. There are a lot worse fates than winning 20+ games per year. And I'm not giving up on that Sweet 16 either. We've come within a basket of it and if we can get that far, we can get there.
MSUCostanza said:Which means only one thing, and you'll never admit it.
Remember, back when you were telling us how Stan Heath was a better coach than Rick Stansbury. And now we find out that he left their program in a mess.Coach34 said:Pelphrey took over a mess at UPig.
Heath got fired for doing the exact thing Stansbury does- make the Tourney from time to time? Mess was in discipline only.patdog said:Remember, back when you were telling us how Stan Heath was a better coach than Rick Stansbury. And now we find out that he left their program in a mess.Coach34 said:Pelphrey took over a mess at UPig.