Oregon, Washington to Big Ten!

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,656
12,643
66
Well supposedly the B10 didn’t want to be “predatory” and wanted the corner schools to move to the B12 first but that’s not what happened. The corners schools were hesitating so from all accounts the B10 was going to stand pat for now if that was the case. Instead the B10 acted first anyway and was “predatory.”

So that’s why I say Fox must’ve made them get over their bout of conscience lol.
Big 10 was predatory when it swooped USC and UCLA. That killed the Pac 12 in essence.

Would be similar if SEC swooped Ohio State and Michigan. Big 10 conference would still exist but for the most part - it lost its heart and soul.

Big 10 jumped at Oregon and Washington due to monopoly on late TV game slot for Friday / Saturday night games and both schools would have went to big 12 if big 10 invite didn’t happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,593
6,825
113
I agree with you for the most part but if any school would find themselves in the crazy position of getting thrown out for another it's RU and for ND.
Oh, no doubt at all. When they announced Was/Ore yesterday I half expected them to say they were paying for it by taking it from our share. Maybe Maryland too, since they had the misfortune of coming in with us.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RUScrew85

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,593
6,825
113
Well supposedly the B10 didn’t want to be “predatory” and wanted the corner schools to move to the B12 first but that’s not what happened. The corners schools were hesitating so from all accounts the B10 was going to stand pat for now if that was the case. Instead the B10 acted first anyway and was “predatory.”

So that’s why I say Fox must’ve made them get over their bout of conscience lol.
I read on one outlet that the Ducks and Huskies were on the fence and leaning toward keeping the PAC alive until they saw how horrible the media rights deal was. That $20mm streaming only package sent everyone scrambling for the exits.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
And dummies like @Gimmy and @RU Cheese thought we would be better off in the dying ACC rather than a Power 2 conference with a 100mm payout and the number 1 basketball recruiting class.

You can't teach stupid.
Say what? #1 recruiting class wow…I don’t pay attention to MBB as much anymore.

Is there such a thing as reverse bandwagon jumper lol. I paid a lot more attention to MBB when we weren’t good and now that we’re much better I’m out of touch haha.

Nonetheless, it’s always nice to see positive news and gives hope that football can become respectable too in the future.
 

MCY

Junior
Sep 23, 2002
2,217
292
0
Don't know if it has been said before (don't have enough time to read all 7 pages of this thread), but adding late night (Eastern) / prime time (Western) TV content was always key to the "next" teams to join the B1G. All of this talk about UNC, Miami or UVA simply didn't make any sense for the B1G network. Yes great schools that fit the mold (mostly), but not from a TV content perspective and for those of you who don't think it matters Google what Gene Smith the OSU AD said recently about expansion. It IS about TV content and yes of course you need to be AAU, big research U, yada yada yada, but the last thing the B1G needs are more teams in the Eastern or even Central time zones.
 

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,540
10,700
103
Big 10 was predatory when it swooped USC and UCLA. That killed the Pac 12 in essence.

Would be similar if SEC swooped Ohio State and Michigan. Big 10 conference would still exist but for the most part - it lost its heart and soul.

Big 10 jumped at Oregon and Washington due to monopoly on late TV game slot for Friday / Saturday night games and both schools would have went to big 12 if big 10 invite didn’t happen.
I think a more accurate way to describe it is the B1G was opportunistic when it grabbed USC and UCLA. USC wanted out for years, and if the B1G didn’t grab them, the SEC or B12 would have.
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,626
35,930
113
Rutgers95 , any acknowledgment of your very loud opinion that Washington was not a Big expansion candidate.
USC had an agreement with BIG that no other PAC12 schools were coming for a specified time period. No one expected the PAC12 to disintegrate with Big12 doing what they're doing thus changing some things obviously. I'd think even you could see that dynamic. This was not optimal for BIG but if those two go to Big12 and sign a GOR and the ACC holds, BIG loses here so they pivoted; smart move

UW makes less sense than RU for a variety of reasons but we're all smart enough to understand that

ND rumblings too as BIG talked to them too....shhh
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,626
35,930
113
Wouldn't hold your breath on that one. None of the original ten are ever being forced out. Personally, I don't ever see anyone ever being forced out but I could see some choosing to leave at some point if certain things happen.
I don't think so either but my point was in response that if they do start cutting away, it's going to be about money. Most of the relationships that made the BIG the BIG are gone now
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
I think a more accurate way to describe it is the B1G was opportunistic when it grabbed USC and UCLA. USC wanted out for years, and if the B1G didn’t grab them, the SEC or B12 would have.
Yeah who approached who? 'Predatory' is a bit much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,626
35,930
113
I'm more concerned with NIL, rev distribution rumblings around conferences, and now what FSU is doing as that could be the game changer to a lot of schools over the horizon. What the BIG is doing is briliant and akin to NFL lite and the league should command the most money. The key is to capture the right schools and markets such that no school will make as much going another route.

ND is not getting 70+mm from NBC, I said years ago that BIG is going to 20 at minimum
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,540
10,700
103
Say what? #1 recruiting class wow…I don’t pay attention to MBB as much anymore.

Is there such a thing as reverse bandwagon jumper lol. I paid a lot more attention to MBB when we weren’t good and now that we’re much better I’m out of touch haha.

Nonetheless, it’s always nice to see positive news and gives hope that football can become respectable too in the future.
These Pike teams are a lot of fun to watch! And the talent Pike and staff are recruiting keeps getting better. This is a program you want to watch!
 

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
4,524
6,759
73
First off, USC and Northwestern are private and not state universities. Also, I didn't realize your initial response had stipulations attached to it. My bad. Anyhow, based on your large university status which is 15,000 or more enrollements, Florida Gulf Coast is right above the cutoff for US institutions and sits at #334. 69 have AAU status out of 334, and that equals a shade over 20%. Calling it a participation trophy at 20% is still a huge stretch. What's the next comparison to support your statement? Peer groups ranked by geographical locations, under a certain elevation and located near a large body of water?
They added 5 or 6 schools this year, they a will add a bunch more next year and the year after that, soon enough u want be able to find a big university that isn’t AAU. And now that they have added South Florida, I am sure Florida Gulf Coast won’t be far behind . . .
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
These Pike teams are a lot of fun to watch! And the talent Pike and staff are recruiting keeps getting better. This is a program you want to watch!
I’m sure it is and I have tuned in a little here and there but bad things seem to happen when I do. Superstitious nut that I am when it comes to sports I’m like let them do better without me “cursing” them haha…so I pay attention a little from afar but not “too close” to keep the bad juju away lol.

Part of is that crazy reason and the other part is just life as I’ve gotten older and interest in a lot of sports has become non existent and CFB is mostly all I pay attention to now.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
I know some have nostalgia for the past and geography etc but I think this move towards a national conference is somewhat of a necessity.

It’s a way to make sure you always have negotiating leverage and are the windshield and never the bug.

You may think the B10 is always in the catbirds seat when it comes to sports rights negotiation and it is a premium sports property but don’t forget the trouble Delany had with ESPN that led to the BTN. Or look at the PAC, when Larry Scott signed this expiring tv deal it was all roses and was the richest in CFB at the time and now look at the PAC.

You can’t rest on your laurels thinking everything will always be well in the future. You need to be forward thinking and buttress yourself to any circumstance. If you make yourself national in all corners of the country with lots brand names you become somewhat unassailable in sports rights negotiations. Then you’re not just a premium property but a super premium one that can still make it in an environment where media companies are counting their pennies and being judicious about where to place their dollars. A sort of mini NFL that is very valuable to them and advertisers in any environment.
Another piggyback to this and creating a national unassailable super premium sports property is with regards to FSU and I’d guess whomever.

If the FSU PE news does come to fruition, which conference offers the most opportunity for returns to pay back any loans to their PE investors? Also as the PE firm which conference might you nudge FSU to in order to make sure you get the most returns from their media rights and commercial opportunities? I think the answer would be the B10 over the SEC.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,794
83,343
113
Another piggyback to this and creating a national unassailable super premium sports property is with regards to FSU and I’d guess whomever.

If the FSU PE news does come to fruition, which conference offers the most opportunity for returns to pay back any loans to their PE investors? Also as the PE firm which conference might you nudge FSU to in order to make sure you get the most returns from their media rights and commercial opportunities? I think the answer would be the B10 over the SEC.
For those not reading through the whole thread and not up on acronyms (me, but I got this one!), PE is "private equity," and this is a wild move by FSU. Screams of desperation to GTFO (I ASSume everyone knows that one) of the ACC ASAP, PDQ. 😜

 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1_rivals

Brisket and Bourbon

All-Conference
Jun 22, 2023
1,138
1,112
0
I’m not a financial type so this is just a reaction, but this seems super risky…as in “if not fails, it will be a spectacular failure”
 

RUBlackout

All-American
Mar 11, 2008
10,480
6,162
113
Rutgers is becoming too entrenched in the conference to ever get kicked out. There is simply no reason to. Forget athletics. The research side all but guarantees existence forever.
Well we need to win and win now so we can prove we belong. Basketball and our other sports are doing well but Football drives the bus
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
195,629
147,229
113
Nah. If we win, great. If we don’t, B1G schools have a place to come to see their teams play in the biggest market in the world.

Rutgers winning or losing. Is irrelevant. It’s always the market.
 

superfan01

All-American
May 29, 2003
8,780
8,003
0
Say what? #1 recruiting class wow…I don’t pay attention to MBB as much anymore.

Is there such a thing as reverse bandwagon jumper lol. I paid a lot more attention to MBB when we weren’t good and now that we’re much better I’m out of touch haha.

Nonetheless, it’s always nice to see positive news and gives hope that football can become respectable too in the future.
When Dylan commits we will have the #1 and #2 overall commits in the nation for 2024. Will actually be one of the top recruiting classes ever.

Time to get on board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1_rivals

graystork

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
8,515
3,367
0
My memory is too long to forget how the ACC killed the Big East with raids on Miami, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Pitt and Syracuse. And how the BE's inept leadership let it happen while protecting its Catholic mid-majors. I hope the ACC gets pillaged by the B10 and SEC dies a slow painful death. They can join the Big East and play basketball with each other.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,129
18,478
113
For those not reading through the whole thread and not up on acronyms (me, but I got this one!), PE is "private equity," and this is a wild move by FSU. Screams of desperation to GTFO (I ASSume everyone knows that one) of the ACC ASAP, PDQ. 😜


Looks to me like that would be some up front cash from a long term rent seeker. Not sure it's a smart move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
For those not reading through the whole thread and not up on acronyms (me, but I got this one!), PE is "private equity," and this is a wild move by FSU. Screams of desperation to GTFO (I ASSume everyone knows that one) of the ACC ASAP, PDQ. 😜

It's interesting the main risk of breaking the GOR is FSU really doesn't know the downside. And that's not workable. But if there's a certain threshold - Say 100MM where they would jump to the BIG or SEC - partnering with an entity that can take that downside risk on with FSU giving up a decent return makes some sense. It's almost like litigation financing but in reverse - where it's plausible the ultimate payout to the ACC ends up not that sizable.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,794
83,343
113
Looks to me like that would be some up front cash from a long term rent seeker. Not sure it's a smart move.
Yeah, it screams of desperation.
FSU had a great run under Bowden, then Fisher before he tanked, then they really tanked, and apparently, they are back on track.
 

Mufasa94

Senior
Jan 9, 2009
1,043
864
113
I didn’t know that. Were those early season OOC games?

Whatever the case, if they can be included in games played in those windows it makes a new package even more attractive to try and sell.
Each of the 3 Thursday games were Labor Day opening weekend conference games, so the impact wasn’t the same as a typical Thursday.

PSU’s Friday games were September conference games. tOSU played NW.

After giving it a little thought, I would not expect a game involving tOSU, UM, or PSU at any of the 4 currently invited west coast teams to “fall” to whatever pecking order pick a potential late night Saturday game would have.

With the additional games added, I do wonder how things will shake out as far as how all the games will be broadcast. The marque games like tOSU/USC are mentioned, but what happens to a broadcast of PSU at Indiana or wave of early season OOC home games? The conference schedule is likely going to need to be more spread out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1_rivals

hawkit3113

Heisman
Apr 14, 2011
51,872
61,358
0
Big 10 was predatory when it swooped USC and UCLA. That killed the Pac 12 in essence.

Would be similar if SEC swooped Ohio State and Michigan. Big 10 conference would still exist but for the most part - it lost its heart and soul.

Big 10 jumped at Oregon and Washington due to monopoly on late TV game slot for Friday / Saturday night games and both schools would have went to big 12 if big 10 invite didn’t happen.


GTFO.

It was their TV deal, ding dong.


If they were making more money, none of this is even being talked about.

The BIG was just there to benefit
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
Each of the 3 Thursday games were Labor Day opening weekend conference games, so the impact wasn’t the same as a typical Thursday.

PSU’s Friday games were September conference games. tOSU played NW.

After giving it a little thought, I would not expect a game involving tOSU, UM, or PSU at any of the 4 currently invited west coast teams to “fall” to whatever pecking order pick a potential late night Saturday game would have.

With the additional games added, I do wonder how things will shake out as far as how all the games will be broadcast. The marque games like tOSU/USC are mentioned, but what happens to a broadcast of PSU at Indiana or wave of early season OOC home games? The conference schedule is likely going to need to be more spread out.
Maybe BTN with its overflow and also possibly Peacock.
 

JerseyNoles

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2021
2,844
2,425
3
Yeah, it screams of desperation.
FSU had a great run under Bowden, then Fisher before he tanked, then they really tanked, and apparently, they are back on track.
This is nothing new for FSU
They've been the underdog for as long as I can remember, not being co-ed until 1947

Brief recap
UF refuses to play them - governor steps in, mandates they play every year (first 7 game in Hogtown)

Money from state - UF reps would hold it up in legislature to FSU even though capital is stones throw from FSU's campus, recently it's gotten split more even

FB scholarships aren't endowed yet - UF's were when Benny Hill gave $ 30 years ago

Expand Doak - don't have money, get it from state by building classrooms in stadium

SEC >>> ACC - speaks for itself w/prestige, money, etc.

Smallest campus in state - buy land, expand campus out that way

Tallahassee is the most remote city in regard to population X hours away out of all P5 programs

FB program doesn't have any money and nearly shuts down - Bowden comes in, installs crazy new offense, takes recruiting to another level, and plays "anyone, anywhere, anytime' earning the monkier the "road warriors" and his personal nickname the "riverboat gambler"

*** Hence, when this issue came up, people put their heads together and figured out a way (s) around it. FSU is used to being the underdog, doing "more with less" because they were forced to that and adapt while building their brand

They don't have generations of doctors/lawyers/successful business people. TLH is a massive pain in the *** to fly into and very expensive. Campus is remote.

Point is they're used to thinking outside the box. They've had to do that to survive and thrive from the late 70's - present day.
 

ImBadRU

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2002
5,471
2,497
0
I get a lot of grants. These conference decisions have zero to do with research. Zero.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,794
83,343
113
Can we stop the bullshyt about us getting thrown out . It serves no purpose other than to give ammo to our detractors. And its absolutely ludicrous
loser mentality permeates the minds of some folks. Not how I roll.
 

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
Can we stop the bullshyt about us getting thrown out . It serves no purpose other than to give ammo to our detractors. And its absolutely ludicrous
Why would we get kicked out, makes no sense. We weren't brought in based on our accomplishments on the field of play in any particular sport. We all know why we are in the B1G, and the same reason holds true today as it did at the time. Also, the conference needs some programs and fans that are satisfied with being also rans and bottom feeders. The four programs they just brought in actually are invested in winning, they are going to need to have some less competitive conference games each year, they all can't be Ohio State vs. USC every week.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,654
15,628
113
Add Cal and Stanford and be done with it.
I believe that will happen , but now think it will be in a couple of years
Before today I felt both would be added to the B1G a little after Oregon and Washington were announced as new members..
But now I think the B1G is looking for revenue justification for adding them and checking out deals that could help make their membership profitable to B1G besides just making sure the B1G controlled all of the West Coast and didn't leave an opening for the B1G 12 to gain a little territory of their own on it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift