no denying 3-0 , with 2 P-5 wins, is the reason he Sagarin ratings has 3-0 Rutgers at #50.But the AP has them at 19. Beating TCU away is vastly better than any of our wins so far. There's no way to deny it.
Trolls NEVER post anything positive after a win. It’s the opposite , they go into hiding in silence until their next chance to troll.no denying 3-0 , with 2 P-5 wins, is the reason he Sagarin ratings has 3-0 Rutgers at #50.
Schiano isn't doing to shabby , but always room for improvement when it comes to the offense.
See you're back posting , don't think I seen any posts from you after RU beat VT to go 3-0.
I was in Europe for 2 weeksno denying 3-0 , with 2 P-5 wins, is the reason he Sagarin ratings has 3-0 Rutgers at #50.
Schiano isn't doing to shabby , but always room for improvement when it comes to the offense.
See you're back posti2ng , don't think I seen any posts from you after RU beat VT to go 3-0.
Simply because at this point in the season the ranking are biased because there has not been enough sample size. Until all the teams are mathematically connected and enough games have been played previous year data is still used to get ratings. As the season progresses, usually around week 4 or 5 that initial data is no longer used and the ratings become unbiased.I’d love to hear Deion Sanders comment on this …
The Sagarin ratings has 3-0 Rutgers at #50 and 3-0 Colorado 19 notches lower at #69.
Like I care if you believe it. My thoughts on Schiano have been made clear. I think he has a very mediocre ceiling. Maybe he'll get to a point where he reliably beats mediocre teams but he's unlikely to ever do better. Lots of our fans are happy with that. I'm not especially thrilled by it.right,
![]()
Exactly …guy/gal hates Schiano…picks and chooses his spots to belittle the program and had not been here for 3 weeks posting anything positive... it would absolutely destroy him and several others if they keep playing competitively and make a bowl game.no denying 3-0 , with 2 P-5 wins, is the reason he Sagarin ratings has 3-0 Rutgers at #50.
Schiano isn't doing to shabby , but always room for improvement when it comes to the offense.
See you're back posting , don't think I seen any posts from you after RU beat VT to go 3-0.
I think we should be happy with that . We have stunk forever - except for a few years with schiano . We need to be realistic . Stop stinking is the first goalLike I care if you believe it. My thoughts on Schiano have been made clear. I think he has a very mediocre ceiling. Maybe he'll get to a point where he reliably beats mediocre teams but he's unlikely to ever do better. Lots of our fans are happy with that. I'm not especially thrilled by it.
“Success is never measured in the heights one attains. “ always a good saying and after years of disappointing outcomes it is nice to see improvements . There will always be those who criticize for the sake of seeing themselves as the opposing opinion. This guy/gal is classic.I think we should be happy with that . We have stunk forever - except for a few years with schiano . We need to be realistic . Stop stinking is the first goal
Absolutely false. 3 games is totally a large enough sample size to know that Ciarrocca is far better than Gleeson will ever be, Wimsatt is fantastic, our defense is NFL caliber and Schiano is underpaid. And all this despite not having the Rutgers Al Fieldhouse built yet. In fact, all this was known fact after just the 1st game. Rutgers should be ranked in the Top 15. Don't believe me ? Just ask this board.Simply because at this point in the season the ranking are biased because there has not been enough sample size. Until all the teams are mathematically connected and enough games have been played previous year data is still used to get ratings. As the season progresses, usually around week 4 or 5 that initial data is no longer used and the ratings become unbiased.
Oh no a message board troll doesn't believe that I was just in Europe for 2 weeks. WHATEVER.WILL.I.DO?![]()
This is more likely
Oh no a message board troll doesn't believe that I was just in Europe for 2 weeks. WHATEVER.WILL.I.DO?
1. At least it’s not on the Round TableJust what we need. Another Colorado thread!
Like I said, who cares if a message board troll doesn't believe me. And FYI they were 3 and 0 last year, too. Schiano hasn't won a NC just yet.![]()
lol, you "go to Europe" when RU is winning and hard to bash the program and/or HC.
Guess" European" basements make great hiding spots when a troll needs to take a break from a forum because he/she can't find things to put down without giving their trollness away.
Have a good whine, after I see your reply will put another troll on my ignore list ( hope you can figure out who that will be)
In case you haven't noticed, Schiano's cult members always have to tear down another coach that turned around another program faster and better.Just what we need. Another Colorado thread!
same old BS after you come out of hidingIn case you haven't noticed, Schiano's cult members always have to tear down another coach that turned around another program faster and better.
Thank God. Tired of talking to this Schiano-is-God troll.same old BS after you come out of hiding
so on my ignore the troll list and time for this
![]()
I'll pick up the slack. He's right! You're an idiot troll!!Thank God. Tired of talking to this Schiano-is-God troll.
And you're an idiot a hole Schiano Cult MemberI'll pick up the slack. He's right! You're an idiot troll!!
No I'm not! You're a certified nut who just happens to hate anything Rutgers!And you're an idiot a hole Schiano Cult Member
FYI numbnuts cult member not particularly liking Schiano is not the same as hating anything Rutgers. What a stupid thing to think. I never say anything negative about Rutgers, just your precious Schiano.No I'm not! You're a certified nut who just happens to hate anything Rutgers!
Your next positive post about Rutgers Football will be your first!FYI numbnuts cult member not particularly liking Schiano is not the same as hating anything Rutgers. What a stupid thing to think. I never say anything negative about Rutgers, just your precious Schiano.
I think most fans think he will get to where you state and recruiting from there will improve and we will see the next jump. Like Pike did. We just hs r more patience than you.Like I care if you believe it. My thoughts on Schiano have been made clear. I think he has a very mediocre ceiling. Maybe he'll get to a point where he reliably beats mediocre teams but he's unlikely to ever do better. Lots of our fans are happy with that. I'm not especially thrilled by it.
It’s happening , the signs are everywhereI think most fans think he will get to where you state and recruiting from there will improve and we will see the next jump. Like Pike did. We just hs r more patience than you.
Deion has more important things to worry about this week, like Oregon and learning the name of his starting true freshman center.I’d love to hear Deion Sanders comment on this …
The Sagarin ratings has 3-0 Rutgers at #50 and 3-0 Colorado 19 notches lower at #69.
Sanders’ and Schiano’s teams have steep climbs today.Deion has more important things to worry about this week, like Oregon and learning the name of his starting true freshman center.
Don't worry so much about what others say. We all know guys like you don't like Rutgers, you like Schiano and can't stand any criticism of him.Your next positive post about Rutgers Football will be your first!
I love Rutgers. In all sports to. I'm one of many that follows and roots for Chris Gotterup. Never wanted Rutgers to fail at anything but you openly do in hopes of making Schiano look bad. You are a sad individual.Don't worry so much about what others say. We all know guys like you don't like Rutgers, you like Schiano and can't stand any criticism of him.
Claiming I openly root for Rutgers to fail so it makes Schiano look bad when I don't shows that you're a Schiano fan not a Rutgers fan.I love Rutgers. In all sports to. I'm one of many that follows and roots for Chris Gotterup. Never wanted Rutgers to fail at anything but you openly do in hopes of making Schiano look bad. You are a sad individual.
No it just makes you a Schiano hater and certainly not a Rutgers supporter! I've been a Rutgers fan literally for life. Some coaches I liked some I didn't. During the Flood and Ash years I thought they were both terrible but I always rooted for a Rutgers win. Sadly you have an agenda!Claiming I openly root for Rutgers to fail so it makes Schiano look bad when I don't shows that you're a Schiano fan not a Rutgers fan.
Give it up True Believer. Schiano is your God.No it just makes you a Schiano hater and certainly not a Rutgers supporter! I've been a Rutgers fan literally for life. Some coaches I liked some I didn't. During the Flood and Ash years I thought they were both terrible but I always rooted for a Rutgers win. Sadly you have an agenda!