OT: Coming to a beach near you in NJ and NY

Status
Not open for further replies.

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,971
0
Google has several articles that seem to indicate that innovation is working on the blade issue

I would bet on innovation
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HPNJRUfan

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,767
83,324
113
In Today's Coast Star (Local paper for South Monmouth beach towns) (just a few snippets from a very long article, but excellent points).

Clean Ocean Action is an Environmental group that does excellent work:

BRIELLE — Clean Ocean Action [COA]
is opposing the federal government’s
leasing of nearly 1 million acres of federal
waters o New Jersey for private
wind farms that could see nearly 600
turbines installed in the first round, and
many hundreds more in a second round.

Because wind energy is renewable,
Ms. Zipf said, COA would not oppose a
small, pilot project of about 50 turbines
developed in a responsible way and
then evaluated for its eect on the marine
ecosystem, before a larger project
is attempted.
But the massive-scale development
already approved o the Jersey Shore
is “reckless privatization” that is “too
much, too fast,” Ms. Zipf said.
The o-shore windmill plan is being
“green-washed” without transparency
or adequate study of possible harmful
impacts on the ocean, she added.

“This is a land grab for big
industry. It’s just absolute
greed. It is so sad because the
ocean has given us so much,
and we are just industrializing
it,” Ms. Zipf said.

“There is no science. There
are a few studies in Europe,
studies that are funded by
the industry. You can’t find
a study that is not funded by
Ørsted or one of the other
wind energy companies."
 

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,971
0
In Today's Coast Star (Local paper for South Monmouth beach towns) (just a few snippets from a very long article, but excellent points).

Clean Ocean Action is an Environmental group that does excellent work:

BRIELLE — Clean Ocean Action [COA]
is opposing the federal government’s
leasing of nearly 1 million acres of federal
waters o New Jersey for private
wind farms that could see nearly 600
turbines installed in the first round, and
many hundreds more in a second round.

Because wind energy is renewable,
Ms. Zipf said, COA would not oppose a
small, pilot project of about 50 turbines
developed in a responsible way and
then evaluated for its eect on the marine
ecosystem, before a larger project
is attempted.
But the massive-scale development
already approved o the Jersey Shore
is “reckless privatization” that is “too
much, too fast,” Ms. Zipf said.
The o-shore windmill plan is being
“green-washed” without transparency
or adequate study of possible harmful
impacts on the ocean, she added.

“This is a land grab for big
industry. It’s just absolute
greed. It is so sad because the
ocean has given us so much,
and we are just industrializing
it,” Ms. Zipf said.

“There is no science. There
are a few studies in Europe,
studies that are funded by
the industry. You can’t find
a study that is not funded by
Ørsted or one of the other
wind energy companies."
It is never a bad idea to start on a smaller scale
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
The more important issue is the HOME RULE one. You may want wind farms and solar.. but towns should be able to decide for themselves. This is an autocratic power grab that no one should be for.

You just know that Murphy and friends are making big $$$ off these sales in one way or another. I recall Christie was trying to sell our highways to private companies to provide automatic tolls by miles driven.. roads the taxpayers paid for across generations. Municipalities have sold off their water departments and garbage collection.. end result is higher prices and no public accountability... and, again, the infrastructure for such services had been paid for by taxpayers for generations.

While privatization, in general, can have advantages.. beware of politicians finding ways to sell off the assets owned by generations of taxpayers for their own private benefit.

What is Murphy doing with the money from these leases?
 
Last edited:

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,767
83,324
113
It is never a bad idea to start on a smaller scale
That was one of my issues in my original post, although not clearly stated. I'm all for green energy, but to grant huge leases without smaller scale studies to determine impacts on wildlife, etc is foolish. Such projects usually involve private and politically connected entities getting rich while there being little to no benefit to the average state resident. American Dream/Xanadu is a good example, and there are many other examples.
 

fg7321

All-American
Nov 29, 2009
4,259
5,133
48
Heard a great discussion about energy independence last week on a podcast. Average home solar install is $30k (same install is $5k in Australia, but why everything is more expensive here is a different conversation). Approximately 85 million standalone homes in the US. They could outfit every home in America with solar, create jobs for days, make us nearly energy independent and help the environment for the same price as the Build Back Better Plan. Wonder why we can't do something practical like this.
Well for one you would put Electric companies out of business. They are doing everything they can to slow down Solar in Red states.

Why are there not solar panels on every school and parking lot in NJ is a mystery
 
  • Like
Reactions: HPNJRUfan

fg7321

All-American
Nov 29, 2009
4,259
5,133
48
The more important issue is the HOME RULE one. You may want wind farms and solar.. but towns should be able to decide for themselves. This is an autocratic power grab that no one should be for.

You just know that Murphy and friends are making big $$$ off these sales in one way or another. I recall Christie was trying to sell our highways to private companies to provide automatic tolls by miles driven.. roads the taxpayers paid for across generations. Municipalities have sold off their water departments and garbage collection.. end result is higher prices and no public accountability... and, again, the infrastructure for such services had been paid for by taxpayers for generations.

While privatization, in general, can have advantages.. beware of politicians finding ways to sell off the assets owned by generations of taxpayers for their own private benefit.

What is Murphy doing with the money from these leases?
But But But privatization and business community will lower costs to taxpayers
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,127
18,477
113
Heard a great discussion about energy independence last week on a podcast. Average home solar install is $30k (same install is $5k in Australia, but why everything is more expensive here is a different conversation). Approximately 85 million standalone homes in the US. They could outfit every home in America with solar, create jobs for days, make us nearly energy independent and help the environment for the same price as the Build Back Better Plan. Wonder why we can't do something practical like this.

So how much would it cost to install the storage capacity to get through the night and cloudy days (and snow covered days in the northern half of the country)? And what does manufacturing and other businesses do for power? Aren't we looking to on-shore, or will we rely on China and their coal plants?

In fact, does the storage technology even exist currently?
 

RUschool

Heisman
Jan 23, 2004
49,910
14,001
78
The more important issue is the HOME RULE one. You may want wind farms and solar.. but towns should be able to decide for themselves. This is an autocratic power grab that no one should be for.

You just know that Murphy and friends are making big $$$ off these sales in one way or another. I recall Christie was trying to sell our highways to private companies to provide automatic tolls by miles driven.. roads the taxpayers paid for across generations. Municipalities have sold off their water departments and garbage collection.. end result is higher prices and no public accountability... and, again, the infrastructure for such services had been paid for by taxpayers for generations.

While privatization, in general, can have advantages.. beware of politicians finding ways to sell off the assets owned by generations of taxpayers for their own private benefit.

What is Murphy doing with the money from these leases?
Sometimes town rule, sometimes states rules and sometimes the Federal rules. In this case, the state rules.

Go WIND POWER
 

RUschool

Heisman
Jan 23, 2004
49,910
14,001
78
Why hasn’t anyone contacted Murphy if the answer is so obvious?

I bet the $4 billion is going directly into Murphy pockets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
Who's "they"?

And what form of feasible energy production, in use today, is perfect and exists without any downsides? It's not like gas stations put up billboards listing all the major oil leaks and the damage done to our world, right?

Does Kellogg's Rice Krispies put "Warning, consuming this can promote loss of limbs due to diabetes" on the boxes?
100%, but why let inconvenient facts get in the way of a phony narrative?
 

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
its a private project, the government is "leasing" the land to them. Hence why your energy bills will skyrocket as these wind farms are not economically feasible. Since they are doing it to make $$, guess who will pay?

The state is just looking at it as another way of making money but in reality its another tax on the citizens who will pay for it via higher electric bills.
“Woe is me!”
 

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
The majority of the New Jersey of residents who bothered to vote, yes voted for him twice. That does not say a lot for the intelligence of those voters, they were such suckers for a carpetbagger twice, not just once.
How couldn’t all those unfortunate dummies not have been blessed with your obvious superior intelligence???

😂😂😂
 

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
Here is more from a purportedly apolitical website. I'm skeptical of the benefits of wind farms in the ocean outweighing detriments. Seem to be too many negatives of putting mechanical devices in a salt water environment and impacts on wildlife.


Meh. Government graft in NJ knows no political boundaries. Both parties are guilty of funding pet projects that do not necessarily benefit their constituents.
I’m guessing you object to offshore oil wells in the same vigorous manner?
 

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
Yep, read the whole thing.

You seem to be cherry picking stuff that fits your dislike of the wind farm plans and ignoring stuff that is more neutral, such as this statement from your quote: "An estimated 140,000 to 500,000 bird deaths occur per year due to turbine collisions, which is substantial, but significantly less than deaths caused by outdoor cats and building collisions."

You saying that you advocate for tearing down all man-made structures to lower the rate of bird deaths?

You're claiming that this proposed site is improper. And for all I know at the moment, it is indeed improper. But you haven't actually provided any objective data to substantiate that this proposed plan is problematic for birds in a way that Audubon would consider improper. Has Audubon weighed in about this site? If they have and they've said it's improper, that would seem more useful to know than whatever's posted at some propaganda site of unknown provenance.

Absent supporting data, why should we take your statement about it being improper as some sort of fact? Surely there must be articles that are for and articles that are against this specific proposed project (or best of all, articles that present both sides of the argument objectively).

Are bird migratory patterns utterly inflexible? Or do they evolve over time with or without human intervention - sort of like how the climate changes all the time with or without human intervention?

Or are you talking about Cap May being at risk for economic issues if birds migrate somewhere else, bypassing the wind farm(s)? In which case, there are ALWAYS people who are harmed while others benefit from any changes.

I have next to no information, based on what's been posted in this thread so far, to reach any sort of valid conclusion about this proposed wind farm project. Maybe it's the worst thing ever. Maybe it's the most wonderful thing ever.

Or maybe it's like every other energy project ever conceived, flawed and filled with inherent difficulties and hidden costs. But neither a panacea nor the end of civilization as we know it.
Tough guy and faux alpha male is apparently a devoted bird watcher. Who woulda guessed??

😂
 

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
the point of my thread is to spread awareness and give a link so people can listen in on the meeting. This way when their electric bills double and triple they can't say, I wish someone would have told me this was happening. Its certainly not something you will see on the local news channel.
Let’s give this “concerned citizen” a big round of applause!!!!

😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersdave

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
While I won’t be surprised to see energy costs continue their ever-upwards climb, which existed long before Murphy or Christie or whoever was governor, I am failing to understand either the math or what people expected? Energy prices fluctuate, but the trend is always upwards.

Math-wise, if NJ is gaining $4B in income, how is that not good for NJ? Absent that $4B, wouldn’t NJ be less well off? Doesn’t it help offset NJ debt obligations or whatever?

Not sure how pricing is a governor’s fault. What’re his choices here? Refuse to lease the area, basically kicking the can down the road. Or lease it and bring in some revenue, help advance the technology some, and hopefully get us closer to figuring out how to eventually accommodating NJ’s massive energy demand without spewing more carbon into the atmosphere or producing massive amounts of radioactive waste.

Is there a third choice? I’m all for increasing natural gas production, nuclear energy production, and multiple forms of renewable energy production. Our kids are gonna need a shitload of energy.
Yes, but..

Democrat = Bad.

Nothing else matters.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,767
83,324
113
Now this I'm all for. You want solar or wind power, fine. But use the areas you've already fvcked up. Don't find Green space areas to **** up in the name of Green energy. It's counterproductive. Or in this case the ocean.
You may have seen from my roof my neighbor 2 doors down has a small solar "farm" in his backyard. I object to the phrase "solar farm." Seems very unnatural and misplaced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koleszar

newell138

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
35,774
45,406
112
Well for one you would put Electric companies out of business. They are doing everything they can to slow down Solar in Red states.

Why are there not solar panels on every school and parking lot in NJ is a mystery

There should be. We just covered the roof of the OC recreation building with them.
 

newell138

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
35,774
45,406
112
15 miles out is in international waters.

New Jersey doesn't get a dime. The leases were auctioned by the Department of the Interior. The money all goes to DC.
One thing NJ does get is higher electric bills
 
  • Like
Reactions: czxqa

Andy117

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
1,039
739
0
Heres some facts for you...

What about Hawaii, California, and Nevada — states that, Hanger noted, “have 10% solar or more”?


Are you under the impression that costs wouldn't have gone up without solar and wind?
 

iReC89

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2014
2,380
1,801
78
I’ve never looked at windmills as a blight. Not sure why, but I assume the wind motion makes them feel more in harmony then say a cargo ship on the horizon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.