OT: Egg price update

3000lbchicken

Active member
May 1, 2006
1,998
469
83
Figures released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture show that the average cost of one dozen eggs is now significantly cheaper than in recent days. The economic indicator website Trading Economics shows that a dozen eggs were $5.51 on Tuesday, more than $2 cheaper than "an all-time high of 8.17 in March of 2025." This represents a decrease of nearly 33 percent.

Which came first?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Darryl Steight

OopsICroomedmypants

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,349
1,870
113
Except there was a reason for egg prices soaring - tens of millions of egg laying chickens were culled due to the Avian Flu. 13 million were culled in December ‘24 alone.
Avian flu threat. If 1 tests positive the FDA steps in and makes the farmer a deal he can’t refuse.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
5,481
9,268
113
Avian Flu is like any other flu, it basically goes away with warmer weather. Not seeing any outbreaks lately, so it's already started. Most years you barely hear about it, but because of the regulations etc running up the price, somebody has to place the panic blame somewhere to try to run it up more.
 

Predestined

Member
Dec 5, 2008
2,360
85
48
Figures released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture show that the average cost of one dozen eggs is now significantly cheaper than in recent days. The economic indicator website Trading Economics shows that a dozen eggs were $5.51 on Tuesday, more than $2 cheaper than "an all-time high of 8.17 in March of 2025." This represents a decrease of nearly 33 percent.


THIS IS EGGCELLENT NEWS
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulldogBlitz

Hot Rock

Active member
Jan 2, 2010
1,532
485
83
People could spend the money they earn at their job on
Giving people a livable wage would eliminate the need. Walmart is the most subsidized company in the world as the majority of their employees get food stamps.

Raise minimum wage to make companies pay their employees a livable wage. Problem solved.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,881
9,199
113
Every big egg laying facility that I’ve ever been to is housed just like broilers are.
The bird flu is in the broilers flocks too, but he is correct that wild birds are the ones that are spreading the flu.
Measles is still pretty widespread in many places. Most US cases until very recently were from unvaccinated Americans travelers who caught it overseas. The difference now is that our vaccination rates have dropped well below the level needed to prevent outbreaks started by the occasional traveler.
Sounds to me like crazy, paranoid, unvaxxed MAGAs living off the grid with wild chickens, are the cause of this whole deal

Lot of that happening lately, I bet they are also the ones that started the deer brain waste or whatever, using all those corn feeders
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
9,724
10,822
113
Giving people a livable wage would eliminate the need. Walmart is the most subsidized company in the world as the majority of their employees get food stamps.

Raise minimum wage to make companies pay their employees a livable wage. Problem solved.
Brilliant. I’m sure that will work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
14,526
4,484
113
People could spend the money they earn at their job on food.
Getting a job.
Jethreaux and Drebin seem to have covered this nicely.

This is far too simplistic a response to be serious attempts at answering my post. All 3 of you know this, yet you took time to respond and make the comments seem earnest.

Your comments claim people using WIC funding dont have a job(which is incorrect) or have money available to spend on food and choose not to(which is incorrect).
Yes, SOME people using WIC funding arent employed when using WIC funding, but many(most?) are.
Yes, SOME people using WIC funding could spend more income on food, but that would just shift the burden elsewhere(rent, energy, etc).

Eligibility for WIC is a family income that is 185% of the federal poverty level, have young kids, and have documented medical/nutritional need.
So no, the responses above do not constitute a plan that would ensure people are able to consistently eat.
For context, a few years ago nearly 40% of babies benefitted from WIC.

There is a documented and established need, so saying 'dont use it' isnt a solution that will improve the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: horshack.sixpack

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
9,724
10,822
113
This is far too simplistic a response to be serious attempts at answering my post. All 3 of you know this, yet you took time to respond and make the comments seem earnest.

Your comments claim people using WIC funding dont have a job(which is incorrect) or have money available to spend on food and choose not to(which is incorrect).
Yes, SOME people using WIC funding arent employed when using WIC funding, but many(most?) are.
Yes, SOME people using WIC funding could spend more income on food, but that would just shift the burden elsewhere(rent, energy, etc).

Eligibility for WIC is a family income that is 185% of the federal poverty level, have young kids, and have documented medical/nutritional need.
So no, the responses above do not constitute a plan that would ensure people are able to consistently eat.
For context, a few years ago nearly 40% of babies benefitted from WIC.

There is a documented and established need, so saying 'dont use it' isnt a solution that will improve the issue.
A. I think WIC/EBT/Food stamps are cruel and intentionally designed to keep people poor and reliant on the government for support.
B. By giving people just enough to not be hungry, the government conditions them to not strive for more.

“A” my not be intentionally cruel, it may be utopian naivety.
“B” I’ll stand on that. Look at the results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloryDawg

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
24,545
13,965
113
Sounds to me like crazy, paranoid, unvaxxed MAGAs living off the grid with wild chickens, are the cause of this whole deal

Lot of that happening lately, I bet they are also the ones that started the deer brain waste or whatever, using all those corn feeders
Yard birds are for sure part of the spread but they don’t intermingle with farm raised chickens at any time.

Chronic wasting gets spread in a number of ways but for sure a lot of the issue is from corn feeders.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
14,526
4,484
113
A. I think WIC/EBT/Food stamps are cruel and intentionally designed to keep people poor and reliant on the government for support.
B. By giving people just enough to not be hungry, the government conditions them to not strive for more.

“A” my not be intentionally cruel, it may be utopian naivety.
“B” I’ll stand on that. Look at the results.
Ok, so what is your solution? I dont want to put words in your mouth, but am I correct in saying your solution is to say '17 it- they can figure out which costs to prioritize and which to ignore. They eat if they prioritize food over other required basic costs and starve if they dont.'

It seems you are saying that, but please correct me if I misunderstand what your plan would be.
If that is your plan, it sure seems like there will be countless unintended(or intended?) consequences that will be felt all thru society- healthcare, schools, utilities, insurance, grocers, employers, etc.


Ironic that you mention cruelty, since 2 in 5 babies were fed thru WIC funding a few years ago, but maybe we have different thresholds for what is cruel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: horshack.sixpack

vhdawg

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2004
4,065
1,263
113
Hopefully by Thanksgiving when I buy my annual carton of eggs to make Thanksgiving breakfast, we'll be back in some good price territory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
9,724
10,822
113
Ok, so what is your solution? I dont want to put words in your mouth, but am I correct in saying your solution is to say '17 it- they can figure out which costs to prioritize and which to ignore. They eat if they prioritize food over other required basic costs and starve if they dont.'

It seems you are saying that, but please correct me if I misunderstand what your plan would be.
If that is your plan, it sure seems like there will be countless unintended(or intended?) consequences that will be felt all thru society- healthcare, schools, utilities, insurance, grocers, employers, etc.


Ironic that you mention cruelty, since 2 in 5 babies were fed thru WIC funding a few years ago, but maybe we have different thresholds for what is cruel.
I believe the people who rely on wic/food stamps will be better off in the long run if those “freebies” are taken away. I believe that would be a very difficult transition, but those people relying on them would be better off in the long run. Their will to survive will kick in and they will get a job in order to buy food and feed themselves and their families. This in turn will lead to numerous other benefits people receive from working.

I think these government benefits are similar to a morbidly obese person whose family members bring them dozens of donuts every day. If those people stopped bringing donuts, would it be difficult on that person? Absolutely. But they would be better off in the long run. Are there people who go through very tough times and need help? Absolutely, but I think what we are doing now makes the problem worse.

Maybe I’m wrong, but I think it’s pretty clear the current system doesn’t work, so let’s quit trying it and do something else. There’s my plan. What is your solution?
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
8,084
5,041
113
Sounds to me like crazy, paranoid, unvaxxed MAGAs living off the grid with wild chickens, are the cause of this whole deal

Lot of that happening lately, I bet they are also the ones that started the deer brain waste or whatever, using all those corn feeders
Vaxx rates, especially for the MMR, don't necessarily follow political lines. RFK Jr is a FLAMING liberal remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aTotal360

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,934
3,749
113
I believe the people who rely on wic/food stamps will be better off in the long run if those “freebies” are taken away. I believe that would be a very difficult transition, but those people relying on them would be better off in the long run. Their will to survive will kick in and they will get a job in order to buy food and feed themselves and their families. This in turn will lead to numerous other benefits people receive from working.
Possible. Also possible these people are unhirable and not equipped to keep a job and the freebies keep them distracted enough that they don't turn to crime to support themselves. So we either get robbed physically or from our paychecks with that population - take your pick.

To be clear, I'm only speaking of the people who habitually rely on the programs - to whatever extent they exist, I really don't know. I think the vast majority of people are fine with these programs to help feed families during bad luck/pinch periods. More context there is always helpful but these discussion end up turning into an oversimplified all good / all bad takes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
8,084
5,041
113
Avian Flu is like any other flu, it basically goes away with warmer weather. Not seeing any outbreaks lately, so it's already started. Most years you barely hear about it, but because of the regulations etc running up the price, somebody has to place the panic blame somewhere to try to run it up more.
There was one in Neshoba County yesterday.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
5,481
9,268
113
This is the third case of avian influenza uncovered in commercial poultry in Mississippi since the spring of 2023. The virus, which is widespread in wild birds worldwide, has also been detected in migratory waterfowl in multiple areas of Mississippi since November 2024.

I know of more than that but it's still not a massive problem as far as eggs go. Now if you want to say it raises chicken prices a little, sure. But those houses aren't where your eggs come from.
 

BulldogBlitz

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2008
12,883
12,308
113
The publix cashier, trying to make small talk, said to me when she saw I had eggs on the conveyor with my other items, "woah, eggs are too expensive to buy". I replied, "well, I don't own a cow or chickens, so here I am forced to buy from publix". She realized it then. She doesn't know that I've cut my NIL contributions accordingly to afford these finer things.
 

tbaydog

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2008
2,045
2,236
113
Possible. Also possible these people are unhirable and not equipped to keep a job and the freebies keep them distracted enough that they don't turn to crime to support themselves. So we either get robbed physically or from our paychecks with that population - take your pick.

To be clear, I'm only speaking of the people who habitually rely on the programs - to whatever extent they exist, I really don't know. I think the vast majority of people are fine with these programs to help feed families during bad luck/pinch periods. More context there is always helpful but these discussion end up turning into an oversimplified all good / all bad takes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight