NYT article mentions 550k long haul drivers in the US. So...that many would want lots of miles.
BellyFullofWhiteDogCrap is very unhinged. It doesn't take much to trigger him!Why is everything about EVs an angry competition to you? There's literally nothing to argue about in the news of some water-damaged EVs catching fire. It's just news. If I owned an EV, it'd be something I would note and tuck away for future reference if my car got flooded.
Surely you're the unnamed person to whom @WhichReligionIsRight was referring with his "serial arguer" comment yesterday.
Not True! I saw Smokey and The Bandit do it back in 1977.
Interesting article. Funny how honest people can become when they aren’t selling something.
Love my electric car but there’s no way I’m using any autonomous features anytime soon.
Actually, the headline is misleading, from my point of view at least.
So that made me curious about similar type one-off purpose built acceleration-type thrills, and I came across the Do-dodonpa roller coaster in Fuji-Q Highland Park, Japan. It runs at "super-death" speeds, by which they apparently mean, 0-125mph in 1.5s.
I didn't read through all the replies but I hope you have been corrected because this is wrong... Your refund has nothing to do with tax liability, that's simply the delta between what you rightfully owe in tax vs what has been withheld. The credit means you will owe less at the end of the year, so if you make 100k, and owe 30 in tax, your credit knocks down the 30... If you withheld 30, you get a refund. If you withheld zero, then you owe less at end of the year.
I suspect this is based on the same findings…
likely from the same findings for sure. but cue the "it saves lives" crowd to argue otherwise.
Shouldn't there also be a study/survey of drivers not using ADAS that eat, text, take eyes off the road...etc? Would you agree the decisions to ban/allow ADAS should be data driven?
When you can't answer 2 legitimate questions honestly, resort to trolling. Well played.
It's not an honest question and he's not trolling; you are.
I just redid last years 1040 including the form 8936 and schedule 3 and you are correct. I would have received a larger refund last year and therefore I should receive a refund for this years taxes.
I pass a young woman on 295 about twice a week, left lane doing 70-75 mph, doing her makeup in her visor mirror. I’d rather be behind someone on autopilot or driver assist. The tech isn’t the problem, as usual, people are the problem.
that is the whole point that the study has found. despite warnings and instructions that ppl have to pay attention and be involved, even with these systems active, there is a significant number who don't and expect the car to drive itself.
Not sure what levers you have available to bring your liability up, and I'm not familiar with all the implications of ira withdrawals - but if there is no down side to it then it seems like an option.
It was a survey, not a study.
i have provided my perspective many many many times on this already. you choose to argue because you don't agree. so i choose to ignore your questions because i choose not to re-enter this circle of stupidity you endeavor to take us on.
