I don't think "Corvette" belongs on your shame list.
The C8 is a normally aspirated V8. The Z06 is a performance hybrid.
I don't think "Corvette" belongs on your shame list.
The C8 is a normally aspirated V8. The Z06 is a performance hybrid.
Now if they could just get to that autonomous one that can drop me at the top of the mountain and pick me up at the bottom, life will be next level.As an owner.. I like that Jeep kept the Wrangler pretty much the same between their Hybrid Wrangler (4xe) and their ICE Wrangler.
Speaking of misinformationSo you knew it was misinformation, but posted anyway. Thanks for clarifying.
Now if they could just get to that autonomous one that can drop me at the top of the mountain and pick me up at the bottom, life will be next level.
Exactly, the yahoos at Yahoo have never heard of vehicle registration data. Corollas sitting on dealership lots are being counted vs Model Ys in customer driveways. Keep trying sport.
Lol ...not for snowboarding or downhill mountain biking, but point takenIsn't it supposed to be the other way around, there, Sir Edmund?![]()
LOL. That’s not what’s happening. But if you read the article you would understand.Exactly, the yahoos at Yahoo have never heard of vehicle registration data. Corollas sitting on dealership lots are being counted vs Model Ys in customer driveways. Keep trying sport.
You have a humiliation fetish. "We contacted Toyota"..... lol. That's their data point. "We can't find a breakout of 3 vs Y"... Solid reporting. It's availableLOL. That’s not what’s happening. But if you read the article you would understand.
Your reading skills need help. You still didn’t get it. They are doing the Tesla word game in the article. I can assure you the numbers are all correct.You have a humiliation fetish. "We contacted Toyota"..... lol. That's their data point. "We can't find a breakout of 3 vs Y"... Solid reporting. It's available
Oh wait, what's this?
These yahoos used vehicle registration data:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tesl...worldwide-in-the-first-quarter-154909234.html
If I were you, I wouldn't assure anything EV related. Your track record speaks for itself.Your reading skills need help. You still didn’t get it. They are doing the Tesla word game in the article. I can assure you the numbers are all correct.
Ironic post is ironic.If I were you, I wouldn't assure anything EV related. Your track record speaks for itself.
11"How many Cybertrucks do you have reserved?"
Wtf?!
Smart move. That’s like 110k in profit only flipping them.
Right? I only suspected it was a BS stat until I read the article. Then I knew."How many Cybertrucks do you have reserved?"
Wtf?!
Um… oh what the hell…Absolutely tremendous defensive play by Volpe.
Two outs man on second running on contact, I immediately told Bill
Madlock…”ball deep in the hole I’m coming to you”
But some of those Danes...I don't know, I watched the Denmark - China match, just now, and neither team really looks competitive. Probably just grind up some chuck and brisket and do the hamburger thing for dinner.
Because they are better?I’m still wondering why anybody would think that whatever the vehicle is with the most sales, nationally or globally, it’s something to crow about. But whatever floats people’s boats.
Oh yay! McDonald’s sells more french fries than Burger King. Woo hoo! I’m so proud. Makes my day.![]()
Because they are better?
There's a lot of that going around. Who cares who else drinks the same beer as you, or who advertises it, or who else listens to the same music? People attach their identity in part to products--the car industry led the way 100 years ago in selling cars as a "lifestyle" and a reflection of who you are and not just transportation. As a result many people care about the image of a product and its popularity: if it's popular that proves you're smart and made a good choice.And, I might argue, it should be meaningless in almost everybody else’s life. It’s a French fry. Or a car. Get what you want and who GAF how popular it is.
Fine.
Indeterminate and subjective. We only know they are more popular, right?
Or we would know it if it’s true. I actually have no idea and, crucially to the point I’m trying to make, don’t care if it’s true or not. It‘s meaningless in my life.
And, I might argue, it should be meaningless in almost everybody else’s life. It’s a French fry. Or a car. Get what you want and who GAF how popular it is.
I appreciate being triggered when it gives me an excuse to emphasize a particular argument. So, gracias mi amigo.![]()
I drive a Subaru but I am not part of that lifestyle.There's a lot of that going around. Who cares who else drinks the same beer as you, or who advertises it, or who else listens to the same music? People attach their identity in part to products--the car industry led the way 100 years ago in selling cars as a "lifestyle" and a reflection of who you are and not just transportation. As a result many people care about the image of a product and its popularity: if it's popular that proves you're smart and made a good choice.
What lifestyle is associated with Subarus? Birkenstock wearing lesbians? Honestly, I didn't know Subaru still existed.I drive a Subaru but I am not part of that lifestyle.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.![]()
I think there’s truth to that and it’s that truth that I object to. That is, people aren’t aware of how much they’re being manipulated into turning their preferences into adulation and worship.There's a lot of that going around. Who cares who else drinks the same beer as you, or who advertises it, or who else listens to the same music? People attach their identity in part to products--the car industry led the way 100 years ago in selling cars as a "lifestyle" and a reflection of who you are and not just transportation. As a result many people care about the image of a product and its popularity: if it's popular that proves you're smart and made a good choice.
Advertising works. There is so much manipulation going on it's insane, and part of the manipulation is to get people to think they're independent thinkers who have arrived at conclusions all their own. Politicians learned this long ago and now control agendas like they never used to as a result.I think there’s truth to that and it’s that truth that I object to. That is, people aren’t aware of how much they’re being manipulated into turning their preferences into adulation and worship.
The idea that a popular choice equates to an intelligent choice is entirely illogical. It’s the process used to make the choice that can be intelligent (or not). If the choice is made because “everybody’s doing it”? Well that’s just plain dumb.
And yet, as you point out, people point to popularity as a confirmation of the wisdom and intelligence of their choices. It’s *** backwards thinking, but becoming more and more common.
And because of that, those same people are soft targets for social engineering and all the manipulation inherent to it.
The level of sophistication in marketing of all sorts of stuff, especially politics and ideology, has skyrocketed over the past 20 years. We’ve gone from people merely being unaware of how they’re being manipulated to want stuff to people being effectively enlisted to be a foundational part of the manipulation.Advertising works. There is so much manipulation going on it's insane, and part of the manipulation is to get people to think they're independent thinkers who have arrived at conclusions all their own. Politicians learned this long ago and now control agendas like they never used to as a result.
And even beyond this, marketers for some time have been working on finding ways around your brain's natural defenses, using functional MRIs to figure out how the brain works in ways relevant to buying things. Long ago they already tried subliminal messaging, but that didn't work well so they're looking deeper. At some point it greatly risks becoming manipulation that can't be tolerated by a society because it's literally finding ways to get people to do things against their will. A technology exists that can beam sound into an ear such that that person is the only one who can hear it. That seems like another dark path.The level of sophistication in marketing of all sorts of stuff, especially politics and ideology, has skyrocketed over the past 20 years. We’ve gone from people merely being unaware of how they’re being manipulated to want stuff to people being effectively enlisted to be a foundational part of the manipulation.
An insidious technique, it leverages people’s preferences, fears, and insecurities, to program people’s selectivity in their skepticism. The psychology behind this is taken directly from research into what compels people to join and then become stuck in cults.
In a cult, people become convinced to irrationally worship the leader (or leadership). At the same time, and critically, they're programmed to identify two broad sets of enemies. One set of enemies is anybody who might provide rational counterpoint to the messaging (e.g. parents). Another set of enemies is people who can be very easily demonized because of the fears inherent to a particular cult's membership.
A big part of the approach is to assert as much control over people's skepticism as possible. Effectively dictate who and what people should trust and distrust.
It's very powerful psychology. It's obviously a big part of how political parties and lobbyist firms, working on behalf of special-interest groups, work today.
But we've also seen adopted by certain corporations as a marketing tool. Relevant to this thread, Tesla is a great example. We can clearly see the distrust programming in how the Teslerati have such an outsized persecution complex - like a cult member - everyone's out to get them.
That didn't happen by accident.
Mix in AI and the whole thing is very troubling. So I'm on a one-man mission (from God) to preach 24/7 skepticism of absolutely everything.And even beyond this, marketers for some time have been working on finding ways around your brain's natural defenses, using functional MRIs to figure out how the brain works in ways relevant to buying things. Long ago they already tried subliminal messaging, but that didn't work well so they're looking deeper. At some point it greatly risks becoming manipulation that can't be tolerated by a society because it's literally finding ways to get people to do things against their will. A technology exists that can beam sound into an ear such that that person is the only one who can hear it. That seems like another dark path.
When a human driver crashes into your car and kills you, with the cause being human error, your family can sue. But most drivers have a pretty limited amount of money so the plaintiff’s award is likewise limited.
When a massive company like Tesla’s car is doing the driving, using frequently updated OTA software, how long will it be before someone is successful in naming Tesla as the defendant and winning the case and the punitive damages reach into the 100s of millions?
I post an opinion about an automotive technology I think is dangerous for other drivers as well as for Tesla shareholders like me who will bear the brunt of potential huge lawsuits. Entirely on topic and highly relevant to the thread.How many times are you going to push this dumb narrative? I know, infinite times; you will make multiple posts expressing faux outrage about how wronged and misunderstood you are. When the real intent is to troll and spam this thread. Why? Dunno. Attention? Jollies?