OT Epstein files
- Thread starter salsa red
- Start date
- Status
Stay away from kids, Hank.For TDS, it has you by the nuts, and has turned you into a schlemiel.
How'd tds make you start thinking about kids now...you're scaring me
See above. Twas explained.
...Unless there are kids up there. Then you stay down here.
Yeah, Maxwell has no reason to say Trump wasn't guilty of anything.
LOL
Yeah she should use that evidence to get off free right? Great point genius. How dumb is she to not get a plea deal when she has evidence on Trump. ...lol
What about Jeffrey. Who is in the files mad at Trump in the files saying he ratted him out.
But hey we should believe you..lol
We all need to organize and go to these people's homes and jobs demanding answers
I would do that if someone is close enough
Conservative crap always out shows the others. Conservatives tend to watch more news/tv and are much less likely to step outside of their bubble to watch/read any other viewpoints.
Dude those files were still under a pending investigation by not only the members of the Biden DOJ but also trump appointed judges. Even if a president wanted them released, federal grand jury material cannot simply be made public without court approval.
I know that the Trump admin doesn't follow the rule of law so you think that somehow your argument holds water. But the fact is it simply doesn't. On top of that.... Biden didn't run on "The most transparent president ever and Releasing the files." Your guy did that. You reap what you sow big boy!
That's because I'm not actually a liberal. Don't mistake my disdain for the "NEW GOP" with liberalism.
No one on the left has stoked the fears that you have mentioned. In fact all of that is propagated by the Trump regime and the christian right. You've been made to think that all of those things mentioned are liberal productions. They are simply responses to actions taken by the MAGA movement and its sycophants.
Name one thing a left politician has said that stoked fear of Whites, Christians, etc. I will give you this. I and many others are fearful of the end game/results of the GOP and ICE. Not because of what some politician said. But because of the actions of those entities.
Nice try at what? Im genuinely clarifying as I cant recall if Im mixing wires and confusing him for another gentleman that spoke so openly about their Christian faith - of which I have no qualms with. So long as you aren't claiming to be a Christian with one side of your mouth, and declaring everyone else in your vicinity a retard with the other half.
See, that is the problem with the left, always pointing the finger but failing to see their own failures. Obama was a druggie, his life totally erased so there are no trails, had a fascination with other males. Clinton couldn't keep his pants on and his wife is a deranged liar who spent millions covering up her own lies and hidden crimes with an indisputable list of bodies in her wake. Joe was such of man of moral character, he lied his way through college, had to drop out of the presidential race because he couldn’t tell the truth, showered with his young daughter and his accuser of sexual harassment was forced to move out of the country. Never mind the protection of the idiots around him while he was lost in space, wandering in the rose garden when he wasn't taking a nap. Liars and those taking the 5th all around and the laptop was just a Russian misinformation as well. The truth is we have a world of liars and criminals that too many people look up to. I don't look up to any of them. I look at policies and even at that they are on balance. The left likes to characterize Trump supporters as blinding idiots. We are not, we hope someone will clean up the foreign and domestic messes that have been left behind - like allowing Iran to have nukes, paying them off and allowing at least 20 million to cross our borders illegally and bankrupt cites and this country housing and feeding them. Yep, some explaining to do for everyone.
Last edited:
LOL. entire party? But lets pretend that they are. The difference would be that I and all others would want them to pay the price for their misdeeds. If Clinton is guilty of being a pedo...Than throw his *** in jail. No one on the Dem side is making excuses for people who are guilty or may be guilty. Now look at MAGA and the circus of excuse making and circle jerking that is going on. It's ridiculous. It's a cult!
Maybe clinton. I would like to see the Transcripts on Obama's comments about Weinstein. The right has been trying to throw shade at Obama for decades. Fact is he is probably the cleanest in terms of morality of any president since ????
Corruption has run amok in both parties but the GOP (presidentially) has far more indicted bad actors then the dems. Not even close.
Summary (Rough Historical Totals, 1961–2016)
| Category | Democratic | Republican |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Branch Indictments | ~3 | ~120+ |
| Executive Branch Convictions | ~1–2 | ~89–95 |
| Prison Sentences | ~1–2 | ~30+ |
| Members of Congress & State/Local Officials | Both parties have convictions; no precise official total |
Or.........try and do some math. There are 3 shows on network late night that are hosted by people who are liberal hacks and only 1 show on network late night that is right wing. The same goes for most regular programing. When half of the country is leans conservative and half leans liberal, splitting half by 3 or 4 or 5 is always going to produce lower numbers than dividing half by 1, maybe 1.5 if you add Newsmax and OAN.
I would remind all of you that late night talk show hosts are actors too. They are playing a role to get the most money/viewers that they can, with the least amount of resistance.
Hillary just can't stop lying.
I dont recall meeting Epstein.
I only saw them at fund raisers yet their is a picture of Ghislaine at Chelsea's wedding...lol
I dont recall meeting Epstein.
I only saw them at fund raisers yet their is a picture of Ghislaine at Chelsea's wedding...lol
Cool well go ahead and get started cause we have the evidence right now.
What are you waiting on?
Why would they reach out to a known Pedophile for ANYTHING?
Even slick Willy gets the benefit of the doubt until actual proof. Trying not to act like the left does.
Attack the messenger not the message. Playbook response.
From my brief encounters with you, you're one of the most level headed posters on here.
But if you're not a loyalist the you will be attacked.
Why is it we can't talk about current issues or current administration without people bringing up people who are not in office anymore.
You honestly think besides immigration this administration has been America first and addressing affordability or price issues.
The corruption and bribing is out in the open and you don't care.
You honestly think besides immigration this administration has been America first and addressing affordability or price issues.
The corruption and bribing is out in the open and you don't care.
Fox. Newsmax. OAN. Brittbart. Damn near every am radiostation (especially in the afternoon)... etc. Yes the late night shows are dominated by left leaning individuals....which would be expected considering the arts and entertainment community are usually left leaning.
But lets not try to pretend that their isn't a fair share of right leaning talk show hosts and news personalities. Almost all cable programs are right leaning.
Bottom line. Conservatives tend to only get their news from a few selected sources while Liberals tend to choose from a variety of sources.
Platform Differences (Where they get news)
Conservatives tend to:
- Watch more cable news, especially:
- Fox News
- Listen to more talk radio
- Use Facebook more heavily for political news
Liberals tend to:
- Use a wider mix of sources
- Consume more digital/online news
- Use NPR and legacy newspapers more, including:
- NPR
- The New York Times
- CNN
- MSNBC
Audience Loyalty Differences
This is where a real difference shows up:
- Conservatives are more likely to rely heavily on one primary source (especially Fox News).
- Liberals are more likely to consume multiple news brands.
Pew has found that a large percentage of consistent conservatives name Fox News as their main source, while liberals’ news diets are more fragmented.
LOL what do you want me to do about it. Arrest Bill and Hillary.
I don't care who gets arrested. Arrest them all. Just stop pretending that Trump is a poor victim, an innocent bystander, a pathetic pawn in the game of politics so to speak.
I do find it interesting that the Clintons are willing to speak about Epstein but only publicly. And the Repubes are against that. Hmmm I wonder why?
We were talking about late night tv ratings and why Gutfeld was leading the way. If half the audience is liberal and half conservative, dividing 1/2 by 3 is going to give each show basically a third of the viewers. There is one conservative late night show, he is going to have higher numbers than the other three because he is alone. Then take into account his show is on at 10pm eastern and not 11:30 and that will increase the viewership even more.Fox. Newsmax. OAN. Brittbart. Damn near every am radiostation (especially in the afternoon)... etc. Yes the late night shows are dominated by left leaning individuals....which would be expected considering the arts and entertainment community are usually left leaning.
But lets not try to pretend that their isn't a fair share of right leaning talk show hosts and news personalities. Almost all cable programs are right leaning.
Bottom line. Conservatives tend to only get their news from a few selected sources while Liberals tend to choose from a variety of sources.
- Watch more cable news, especially:
- Fox News
- Listen to more talk radio
- Use Facebook more heavily for political news
- Use a wider mix of sources
- Consume more digital/online news
- Use NPR and legacy newspapers more, including:
- NPR
- The New York Times
- CNN
- MSNBC
This is where a real difference shows up:
- Conservatives are more likely to rely heavily on one primary source (especially Fox News).
- Liberals are more likely to consume multiple news brands.
Pew has found that a large percentage of consistent conservatives name Fox News as their main source, while liberals’ news diets are more fragmented.
I am not sure where the radio shows come into this discussion. Other than you had no argument for the late night TV shows so you decided to move the goal posts.
As far as my point on primetime or other shows on FoxNews vs MSNOW/CNN, those 2 are splitting their audience again. So Fox is going to out draw them because they are the only one in town. Newsmax and OAN are just a blip on the radar.
As far as liberals getting their news from multiple sources, ha ha ha that's funny. It is the same exact message on all the networks. There is no variety of opinion, unless it is Scott Jennings consistently making dems look silly.
DING DING DING!
You are correct. THEY DON"T CARE! as long as he/they can own the libs...nothing else matters.
Trump Profiting Bigly. Read some where that he has made more money of the presidency (by a wide margin) than all of the previous presidents combined.
Reported Figures (Not Official Government Accounting)
~$1.4 Billion in Personal Profit
• Multiple news outlets report that Trump’s personal businesses have earned roughly $1.4 billion during the first year of his second presidency from ventures tied to his brand — including licensing, crypto, media, and other business revenues. This is based on a New York Times–linked analysis of his economic activity.
~$1.8 Billion in Cash & Gifts
• A tracker project called “Trump’s Take” — maintained by a progressive research group — estimates Trump and his family have collected more than $1.8 billion in cash and gifts since his 2024 election, including significant crypto-related gains.
Billions in Net Worth Growth
• Reports from wealthy-individual tracking outlets like Forbes suggest Trump’s net worth increased by roughly $3 billion over a recent 12-month span, most of which occurred after he returned to the presidency — largely due to the surge in crypto-related assets and brand licensing deals.
Approximate Total (2024–2025 Earnings)
| Category | Estimated Amount |
|---|---|
| Crypto & Digital Asset Gains | ~$800 M to $1.4 B+ |
| Golf/Hotels & Hospitality Revenue | ~$300 M–$450 M |
| Licensing/Merch & Other Income | ~$20 M–$60 M |
| Total Estimated Income | ~$1.1 B to $1.9 B+ |
It's impressive how confident you are for someone who is wrong.
I'm going to link these studies now because:
a) I know you're too dumb & lazy to read them
b) I want everyone to see how stupid you are
and by the way, nobody is going to take you seriously when you copy/paste ChatGPT.
So with this argument it would then make sense to say that there is a direct reason that Gutfeld has more viewers than the other three. And that his time slot allows for even more viewers. I guess I'm not really seeing what your point is. I thought you were trying to say that the other 3 were poor hosts proven by their lower viewership. Than you go on to say Gutfeld has a statistical advantage.
I'm not following your argument in totality.
I brought up the other sources, not to move the goal post but to show that their are indeed a lot of conservative outlets that have a solid following of listeners or viewers. My thought was that you were trying to say that the conservatives don't have a fair share of avenues to get their info.
The same message ='s tried and true methods of triangulating information.
Keep in mind that Fox paid out a large sum (780B) for defamation and inaccuracies. And then wen't on to claim that their news is for entertainment purposes only and therefor should not be viewed through a lens of accurate news reporting. That's the source that you and others claim to be fair, balanced and accurate? all the while saying that the MSM is lying and manipulating the truth and that they shouldn't be believed because what...They are all reporting virtually the same information? Come on now!
no they didn't.
ChatGPT doesn't do well with numbers, you need to double-check your data.
Also:
Decision Made In Doctor's Lawsuit Against MSNBC | iHeart
A decision has been made in a doctor's lawsuit against MSNBC. | iHeart
CNN Confirms Settlement After $275 Million Lawsuit with Nick Sandmann
CNN confirmed Tuesday that it has settled for an undisclosed amount with Nick Sandmann, one of the Covington Catholic High School students smeared by multiple news outlets after a video of a “standoff” between the teens and a Native American activist went viral. Following initial reports on the...
thenationaltriallawyers.org
🫵
Just post the evidence or admit you made it up. Show some character here and do the right thing.
I always find it interesting when people claim that listing your sources makes you less believable, while they go on to list their sources. lol You do realize that Chat GPT and other AI entities pull their info from the same places you wen't out and had to search for. You do get this don't you?
A psych article from 2009 before Trumpism/MAGA took birth is irrelevant to this discussion. Bottom line...America is in a different place all together after the Trump malignancy took root.
"Conclusion Western societies are growing more diverse, and with diversity comes differing ideals about how best to regulate selfishness and about how we ought to live together. Participants in political debates are motivated in part by moral convictions. Moral foundations theory offers a useful way to conceptualize and measure such convictions. As research on political psychology thrives (Jost, 2006), we hope that it will clarify the role that morality plays in political thought and behavior". (WELL NO ****)
2nd article
"The results of this analysis are striking. Of the 13 forms of media consumption habits we surveyed, only one (network news) is associated with a lower Perception Gap. Several (CNN, MSNBC, certain religious news sources, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Times) have no statistically significant effect, and the rest (9 in total) are positively associated with the Perception Gap. For example, the Perception Gap of those who do not regularly consume Fox News is 20 percentage points. The additional Perception Gap of consuming Fox News is +4 percentage points—a proportional increase of 20 percent. This effect is even more pronounced for left-leaning sources like Slate, Buzzfeed, Daily Kos, and the Huffington Post, non-readers of which have an average Perception Gap of 20 percentage points, but whose readers can expect an additional Perception Gap of +8: a proportional increase of 40 percent. But the media sources consistently associated with the largest Perception Gap (NOT GOOD) are the right-leaning sources Breitbart News, the Drudge Report, and conservative talk radio (e.g., Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity). While, again, people who do not consume these forms of media can expect an average Perception Gap of about 20 percentage points, those who do consume them show an average of +11, +11, and +9 percentage point increase in the Perception Gap, respectively: roughly equivalent to a 50 percent proportional increase. On the other hand, the media associated with a clear reduction in Perception Gaps are the television network channels ABC, CBS and NBC. Consumers of content from these sources are on average 6 percentage points more accurate in their perceptions than other Americans. Aside from this, ironically the only other type of media consumption associated with more accuracy is “None of the above." People who consume no media are, on average, 2 percentage points more accurate than those who do" (Not sure this says what you want it to say) Of course not sure what point you were really trying to make either so do tell.
Nope, it's 100% relevant, and the second study reinforces the first.
But you didn't make it past page 6, so you wouldn't know that.
Take your time and step out of your bubble, princess.
The ratings are low because you have a saturated market with 3 guys basically saying the same thing in their monologues provided to them by the DNC. Then they rotate guests that all have the same level of hatred for conservatives.
When you only have 1/2 of the adults that are interested in what they have to say to start with, then you basically divide that limited group by 3, there is no way to maintain enough viewership and sponsors to pay all three $10's of millions per year along with the increased production costs. It is estimated that Colbert was losing $40 million per year, Kimmell basically started losing money in 2023, Fallon is losing the least, but still not profitable. Then you have Gutfeld's show that keeps production costs at about $20 mil per year, his salary is $7 mil per year, but he is on multiple shows. Compared to the other 3 shows, who have production costs in the $100 million range and salaries in the $15-20 million range.
That is how a conservative cable talk show can financially outperform and have more viewers than each of the 3 liberal late night shows. Soon to be 2shows in May 2026.
- Status