OT: Just watched Everything Everywhere All At Once

NickKnight 1

All-Conference
Mar 22, 2003
8,778
2,052
0
Is it that weird for a nearly 50 year old movie? Like them or not (I was not too fond of them), but Siskel and Ebert were the go to movie reviewers of their time. Siskel had issues with the characters of Paulie and Adrian.
What were the issues I am just curious?
 

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
Your kidding right?
*you're

Nope. Totally serious. Too much mumbling, too much Philly. And if the film is meant to be, in any small way, an homage to Chuck Wepner then where it landed is a bit disrespectful, is it not? Why not Bayonne instead of Philly?

The mid to late 70s was sparse, from an artistic perspective. We suffered through bad music (disco), bad television and bad movies. I mean, how horrific was Grease? You had people in their 30s playing high school students (ONJ was 30, Stockard Channing was 34) and they looked it.
 

tico brown

Heisman
Oct 16, 2005
43,277
13,315
93
You have to give credit to Stallone
There are several "actors" who have had hit movies that have generated sequels with more than one character and
he was able to have the Rocky and Rambo series, so we give him credit there
The fact that we now have Creed still going is admirable
And it’s a shame that the Directors and execs “took” the movie from Stallone.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
I finished Everything Everywhere... but as others say, not Best Picture material. But most of what gets nominated today are more arthouse pieces... and winners are chosen via favoritism and other criteria including voting campaigns "for your consideration".

Back in the 1970s nominations were all good movies.. Rocky was up against this field...

Rocky
All the Presidents Men
Taxi Driver
Network
Bound for Glory (Woodie Guthrie biopic)

Marathon Man and The Omen were also 1976 pics suitable for possible nomination. Keep in mind the Academy voters were more old-conservative Hollywood at the time otherwise All the Presidents would likely have won. Then maybe Network... but that glorified the TV News business... not a Hollywood favorite in the film vs TV debate.

I expect the vote was split many ways for Rocky to win. That the lead actor wrote the story.. that was a Hollywood Rocky story itself. Much like how Matt Damon and Ben Afleck won for Good Will Hunting.
 
Last edited:

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
beaced saw RAMBO.LIKED IT. Never saw ROCKY. BUT I am thinking about getting a date and finding where it might be playing.
He beaced.. saw a tee-shirt teh other day about having lived through 6/6/66, 7,7,77,etc etc to 2/22/22.. it occurred to me that you have "batted the cycle" in that regard.. so... cheers!

 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,201
24,836
113
I finished Everything Everywhere... but as others say, not Best Picture material. But most of what gets nominated today are more arthouse pieces... and winners are chosen via favoritism and other criteria including voting campaigns "for your consideration".

Back in the 1970s nominations were all good movies.. Rocky was up against this field...

Rocky
All the Presidents Men
Taxi Driver
Network
Bound for Glory (Woodie Guthrie biopic)

Marathon Man and The Omen were also 1976 pics suitable for possible nomination. Keep in mind the Academy voters were more old-conservative Hollywood at the time otherwise All the Presidents would likely have won. Then maybe Network... but that glorified the TV News business... not a Hollywood favorite in the film vs TV debate.

I expect the vote was split many ways for Rocky to win. That the lead actor wrote the story.. that was a Hollywood Rocky story itself. Much like how Matt Damon and Ben Afleck won for Good Will Hunting.
I remember the Daily News headline the next day after Rocky won
Home movie wins best picture
 

AntiG

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2012
4,512
3,561
113
I’m curious whether to know whether people who liked or hated it saw it in the theater or at home. Based on what I’ve read and heard from friends who have seen it, it’s one of those “you have to see it in a theater” films
I saw it at home a few months ago.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,841
83,386
113
What were the issues I am just curious?
He found Adrian "too shy and retiring" and Paulie "it's just embarrassing. . .the worse method acting."

More here:



Not Siskel or Ebert, but the guy who posted the review on YouTube, had this to say, which is interesting. Some are going to take exception to the comparison to Raging Bull. Funny think, I tried watching Raging Bull more than once and turned it off every time. 🤷‍♂️ I can't say Raging Bull is "bad," but I disliked it.

One reason people like Rocky, and particularly a lot of Rutgers fans, is because the underdog wins?

"filmed in raw gritty style by Bill Butler who also photographed The Conversation (1974) and Jaws (1975). Rocky was one of the very first films to use the Stedi-Cam as we see Rocky run up the stairs of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. The art direction of Rocky reminds me of Taxi Driver which was also released in 1976, both films reek of poverty and capture an era than no longer exists, superb locations in both films. The gritty look, writing by Stallone, performances by all and the iconic music by Bill Conti make me feel that Rocky along with Raging Bull are the finest boxing films ever made."
 

ashokan

Heisman
May 3, 2011
25,325
19,686
0
He found Adrian "too shy and retiring" and Paulie "it's just embarrassing. . .the worse method acting."

More here:



Not Siskel or Ebert, but the guy who posted the review on YouTube, had this to say, which is interesting. Some are going to take exception to the comparison to Raging Bull. Funny think, I tried watching Raging Bull more than once and turned it off every time. 🤷‍♂️ I can't say Raging Bull is "bad," but I disliked it.

One reason people like Rocky, and particularly a lot of Rutgers fans, is because the underdog wins?


Stallone himself spoke about the Raging Bull comparison and he said Bull is about a real fighter while Rocky is a metaphor. That's why Rocky opens (Stallone says) with a shot of Jesus over the ring. Rocky is one of the downtrodden, invisible masses but he has a destiny to accomplish - a higher calling he doesn't even know about.

Along the way he encounters a lot of resistance and hostility. Rocky and the people in his life are all broken and frustrated. Rocky is always being insulted and dismissed. Mick calls him a bum who fights like an ape. A young girl he tries to help gives him the "up-yours" sign. A fellow fighter at Rocky's gym tells him how much he likes Rocky's locker after he got after Mickey who took it away from Rocky.

Even Gazzo's driver hates him but Gazzo tells Rock "Some guys they just hate for no reason." Rocky on the other hand is not like that. He does bad things to survive but its just "work" he needs and his heart isn't in it. He's always trying to do good without thinking about it. He's walking down a street and picks-up a drunk passed out on the sidewalk. Most people wouldn't even notice the guy but Rocky helps without giving thought.

In the end when he survives the fight he doesn't even care. Apollo wins but Rocky takes him the distance for the first time. Rocky wins over himself by doing more then he thought he could - surviving.

I always find the love story and the Pauli stuff a drag but they represent a group of unrealized souls with various torments. The construction of the film makes up for it










This is how you win Oscar for editing - Gazzo spits in a long shot.
Then comes a medium shot with Gazzo wiping his mouth after the spit.
Subtle but very smooth transition - clever - the whole film rolls like that


 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,841
83,386
113
Stallone himself spoke about the Raging Bull comparison and he said Bull is about a real fighter while Rocky is a metaphor. That's why Rocky opens (Stallone says) with a shot of Jesus over the ring. Rocky is one of the downtrodden, invisible masses but he has a destiny to accomplish - a higher calling he doesn't even know about.

Along the way he encounters a lot of resistance and hostility. Rocky and the people in his life are all broken and frustrated. Rocky is always being insulted and dismissed. Mick calls him a bum who fights like an ape. A young girl he tries to help gives him the "up-yours" sign. A fellow fighter at Rocky's gym tells him how much he likes Rocky's locker after he got after Mickey who took it away from Rocky.

Even Gazzo's driver hates him but Gazzo tells Rock "Some guys they just hate for no reason." Rocky on the other hand is not like that. He does bad things to survive but its just "work" he needs and his heart isn't in it. He's always trying to do good without thinking about it. He's walking down a street and picks-up a drunk passed out on the sidewalk. Most people wouldn't even notice the guy but Rocky helps without giving thought.

In the end when he survives the fight he doesn't even care. Apollo wins but Rocky takes him the distance for the first time. Rocky wins over himself by doing more then he thought he could - surviving.

I always find the love story and the Pauli stuff a drag but they represent a group of unrealized souls with various torments. The construction of the film makes up for it










This is how you win Oscar for editing - Gazzo spits in a long shot.
Then comes a medium shot with Gazzo wiping his mouth after the spit.
Subtle but very smooth transition - clever - the whole film rolls like that


Had not realized that Gazzo, played by Joe Spinell was in Taxi Driver. Obviously, he played Willi Cicci in the Godfather and Part II. He was in another Stallone movie, Nighthawks. He was friends with Sly Stallone and the godfather of Sage Stallone. He died a weird and tragic death in his apartment in Queens- "he cut himself badly on his glass shower stall door after apparently slipping in the bathtub while showering. Soon afterward he fell asleep on his living room couch instead of calling for help."

 
  • Wow
Reactions: BLewis1968

ashokan

Heisman
May 3, 2011
25,325
19,686
0
Had not realized that Gazzo, played by Joe Spinell was in Taxi Driver. Obviously, he played Willi Cicci in the Godfather and Part II. He was in another Stallone movie, Nighthawks. He was friends with Sly Stallone and the godfather of Sage Stallone. He died a weird and tragic death in his apartment in Queens- "he cut himself badly on his glass shower stall door after apparently slipping in the bathtub while showering. Soon afterward he fell asleep on his living room couch instead of calling for help."


Wow - horrible way to go.
He was a great character in the film and especially in that key scene.
If you had to work for a loan shark Gazzo would do - he always looked out for Rock

Another small detail from the key car scene... Rocky tells Gazzo he only got $130 from a borrower who owed $200. Rocky was supposed to break his thumb but then figured he couldn't work and pay. Rocky tells Gazzo he thinks he'll get the other $30 next week. Gazzo says "Sure Rocky Bob is good for it."

By calling borrower "Bob" and calling him "reliable" Gazzo talks about the guy like they are friends. But when Rocky and Gazzo talk out of the car Gazzo says "How come you didn't break this guy's thumb like I told you." So "Bob" goes from being a real person to "this guy" like he' a piece of meat.

A piece of meat is what Rocky is too. When he goes to the ring for the fight, the back of his robe has an ad for "Shamrock Meats" (where he was punching the beef). Mickey sees the ad and asks Rocky "What do you get out of it?" Rocky says "Pauli get three thousand dollars and I get the robe."

Oh and the drunk Rocky picks off the ground at the pub is Lloyd Kaufman of Troma Films (Toxic Avenger, Class of Nuke 'Em High and other films)


 
Last edited:

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
Nope.

You're not old enough to have seen it first run in the theater in '79 or whatever it was. It's awful. Stallone is barely functional. You can't understand half of what he's saying. The dialog is... well, it's like it was written by the late 70s version of Chat GTP. Carl Weathers was straight-up the best part of that movie. And it was fun watching Burgess Meredith deliver his dialog and imagining him as The Penguin. But other than that... awful.
I'm just curious, how old are you? When this came out, I was 10 years old and it was awesome. I loved the first four Rockys and will watch them on public TV (even though I own the DVDs). Fighting, underdog Rocky and MIckey. Yeah, the acting was not real good but the storyline made up for it.
You always come back to ~ 50 year old quote from a dead movie critic? Wierd.
Are there any present day movie critics (reliable ones) reviewing movies from 50 years ago? Those dudes had their own TV show and were the authoritarians of the day. But to each their own.
beaced saw RAMBO.LIKED IT. Never saw ROCKY. BUT I am thinking about getting a date and finding where it might be playing.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. It's gonna be very difficult to find it in a theater. BUT (and with all do respect to Beaced), there are these neat things called DVDs and/or a nifty concept called on demand/streaming. And by the way, the date will then need to come to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,631
37,296
113
I'm just curious, how old are you? When this came out, I was 10 years old and it was awesome. I loved the first four Rockys and will watch them on public TV (even though I own the DVDs). Fighting, underdog Rocky and MIckey. Yeah, the acting was not real good but the storyline made up for it.

Are there any present day movie critics (reliable ones) reviewing movies from 50 years ago? Those dudes had their own TV show and were the authoritarians of the day. But to each their own.

I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. It's gonna be very difficult to find it in a theater. BUT (and with all do respect to Beaced), there are these neat things called DVDs and/or a nifty concept called on demand/streaming. And by the way, the date will then need to come to you.
Beaced does it like a real man- take tge woman on a real date…lol @beaced
 

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
You guys just made me watch Rocky. Sorry 4real- love ya but u r wrong.

It is a Great movie. Everything from the story and the mix if simple and complex.
The filmography is also insane.
It captures that era perfectly.

Now, I’m stuck watching #2 lol
First four are all worth the time spent on the couch. I just watched Rocky IV (for the umpteenth time) the other day and Creed 2 (for the 2nd or 3rd time).
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,841
83,386
113
I'm just curious, how old are you? When this came out, I was 10 years old and it was awesome. I loved the first four Rockys and will watch them on public TV (even though I own the DVDs). Fighting, underdog Rocky and MIckey. Yeah, the acting was not real good but the storyline made up for it.

Are there any present day movie critics (reliable ones) reviewing movies from 50 years ago? Those dudes had their own TV show and were the authoritarians of the day. But to each their own.

I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. It's gonna be very difficult to find it in a theater. BUT (and with all do respect to Beaced), there are these neat things called DVDs and/or a nifty concept called on demand/streaming. And by the way, the date will then need to come to you.
We are about the same age. I remember it when it came out, but I did not come to appreciate it until many years later.

@beaced may have a Betamax player. Can we take up a collection for Rocky on Beta? $45 on E-bay.

 
  • Like
Reactions: LETSGORU91

ashokan

Heisman
May 3, 2011
25,325
19,686
0
We are about the same age. I remember it when it came out, but I did not come to appreciate it until many years later.
I was the same.
Movie was ok to me at the time but nothing I wanted to see twice.
Then I studied some film (I once spent a whole day at Hunter College going through Casablanca scene by scene) and picked-up on some inside baseball stuff.

Stallone wasn't doing Shakespeare obviously but the simple dialogue doesn't mean he acted bad. Stallone is playing a simple character like Forrest Gump. A lot of his acting is how he walks, looks, uses props -and with a simple economy most of the time . Stallone had the perfect looks for Rocky - like Peter Lorre had looks for his roles. He does a lot with his expressions.

Michelangelo said that what makes a work of art great isn't what you put into it but what you leave out. In clip below Michael Caine explains why actors shouldn't blink in some scenes

 

Scarlet1984

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2004
4,984
3,863
0
Nope.

You're not old enough to have seen it first run in the theater in '79 or whatever it was. It's awful. Stallone is barely functional. You can't understand half of what he's saying. The dialog is... well, it's like it was written by the late 70s version of Chat GTP. Carl Weathers was straight-up the best part of that movie. And it was fun watching Burgess Meredith deliver his dialog and imagining him as The Penguin. But other than that... awful.

You are confusing your opinion and odd take with facts
 

Knightmoves

Heisman
Jul 31, 2001
30,181
15,995
113
Thought Banshees of Inisherin and Aftersun were better than Everything Everywhere, but it was far from a terrible movie. If folks haven’t seen it, the writers’ previous movie Swiss Army Man is pretty absurd and fun.
I liked Banshees of Inisherin. Interesting and surprising outcomes when a long term relationship ends.
 
Last edited:

megadrone

Senior
Jul 10, 2003
24,128
894
56
My wife and I watched "Everything Everywhere" and while we liked it, couldn't believe it was Best Picture material. I liked Banshees better and that was closer to Best Picture.

IMO, Best Picture for any given year should be something unforgettable, but some years are slower than others, and Hollywood now has a lot of criteria that could remove the actual best picture from consideration.

As far as Rocky and Rambo are concerned, the first movies of both series were great. Rocky II wasn't bad as sequels go, but they should have stopped there. The Rambo series went over the top really quickly, but the first movie was a decent story and plausible. Good entertainment in First Blood, but not best picture material. Rocky was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet1984

CranfordKnight

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2006
4,057
3,886
113
Based on all the rave reviews, the last two movies my wife and I watched were Everything Everywhere and Banshees of Inisherin. Both were such a struggle to get through. We hated both. At least with EE, I can understand the appeal to many, just not my cup of tea. Bashees was just boring and weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet1984

beaced_rivals

Heisman
Jul 18, 2004
32,005
10,321
0
I have not been out to the movies in a very long time.GIVE ME A GOOD GARY COOPER PIC and I will be a happy camper.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,201
24,836
113
*you're

Nope. Totally serious. Too much mumbling, too much Philly. And if the film is meant to be, in any small way, an homage to Chuck Wepner then where it landed is a bit disrespectful, is it not? Why not Bayonne instead of Philly?

The mid to late 70s was sparse, from an artistic perspective. We suffered through bad music (disco), bad television and bad movies. I mean, how horrific was Grease? You had people in their 30s playing high school students (ONJ was 30, Stockard Channing was 34) and they looked it.
there are still people out there that thought Wepner knocked Ali down, I guess Stallone might have thought so for a time..... Wepner stepped on Ali's foot as Ali was moving back

 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,201
24,836
113
I was the same.
Movie was ok to me at the time but nothing I wanted to see twice.
Then I studied some film (I once spent a whole day at Hunter College going through Casablanca scene by scene) and picked-up on some inside baseball stuff.

Stallone wasn't doing Shakespeare obviously but the simple dialogue doesn't mean he acted bad. Stallone is playing a simple character like Forrest Gump. A lot of his acting is how he walks, looks, uses props -and with a simple economy most of the time . Stallone had the perfect looks for Rocky - like Peter Lorre had looks for his roles. He does a lot with his expressions.

Michelangelo said that what makes a work of art great isn't what you put into it but what you leave out. In clip below Michael Caine explains why actors shouldn't blink in some scenes


Enjoyed the Caine video
I also like the part where he showed the difference when he would change which eye he was looking at
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashokan

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,385
43,487
113
I think it’s a love or hate movie. Everyone I know who watched it either loved it or hated it. I went into it thinking I wouldn’t like it but I ended up loving it.
Very true. My wife and I loved it, but have had friends who hated it. IMO, the "battles" in various versions of the past and future become a bit monotonous, but they are incredibly well done, visually and sonically (and also why it's way better to see in the theater). But at it's heart, it's a great story about family and relationships and focusing on what's really important, not the regret for things that one can't change anyway.
 

iReC89

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2014
2,387
1,808
78
It might be one of those movies that works better on a big screen at a theater. off the charts weird but cool and well done. We liked it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU848789

RU05

All-American
Jun 25, 2015
14,501
9,079
113
It might be one of those movies that works better on a big screen at a theater. off the charts weird but cool and well done. We liked it.
From this post, and others above, it sounds like you need to like weird movies to like it.

It was in and out of our local theater pretty quickly. I feel like I need to track it down and go see it now.
 

willisneverrana43

All-American
Jul 26, 2001
10,766
6,770
113
Wait what?

Rocky is one my list of near perfect movies. Who doesn't love Rocky?

I always come back to what Roger Ebert said in his original review for the Sun Times

"What makes the movie extraordinary is that it doesn't try to surprise us with an original plot, with twists and complications; it wants to involve us on an elemental, a sometimes savage, level. It's about heroism and realizing your potential, about taking your best shot and sticking by your girl. It sounds not only clichéd but corny -- and yet it's not, not a bit, because it really does work on those levels. It involves us emotionally, it makes us commit ourselves: We find, maybe to our surprise after remaining detached during so many movies, that this time we care."
Not to worry. It’s great movie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift