OT: Missing Titanic Sub

Rufaninga

All-Conference
Oct 8, 2010
3,873
4,407
0
If it turns out the Playstation controller wasn't at fault but the multimillion dollar custom portal window imploded, can we take a lesson that pushbuttons are pushbuttons, and it doesn't need to be expensive to be the best solutions?
It can be less expensive, as long as it's tested to hold up to x amount of use and there is a backup system in place.

What good is wireless controller only if you are at the bottom of the ocean and the UP button isn't working???
 

yessir321

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2018
3,313
2,229
0
Are video game controllers poorly engineered? How would you know if that custom & expensive looking pilot console is more or less reliable than a game controller that has been tried & true millions of times over? It's the same signals coming out the interface pins whether its a $50 8bitdo controller or a $5000 custom job. Yeah it's a bit unexpected but you think the computer mice at your local power plant are any more special than what's on your desk?
Yes video game controllers in particular ‘Logitech’ controllers are poorly engineered if you will. As someone who has played video games all my life I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve replaced controllers due to buttons sticking, popping out, and simply no longer working.

Keep in mind, they didn’t even pony up for actual PlayStation controllers, these were $29.99 knockoffs available at Walmart. Yes, there’s a HUGE problem with controlling a vessel containing people in a life death situation with nothing more than a knockoff PlayStation controller to steer the thing. I’d say the fact that this is happening is pretty clear evidence that that alone is a GIANT red flag!
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
I think we agree mostly, but I think it looks pretty cool and fully understand why they'd want to do it. Unfortunately, looks to be horrifically executed.

Blame goes on the company, not the people who paid for a trip.
I just don't get it personally. Forget about the risk factors for a moment - you physically can't get out and walk the ocean floor and actually touch the titanic - which would be quite amazing I would think. It's like paying a huge amount to visit the statue of liberty but all you can do is look at it through your car window from the parking lot. I don't mean to insult the folks who did it in a very scary situation - I just don't honestly understand why you'd spend 250k other than some weird bragging rights. And that's putting aside the risk factors.
 

fsg2_rivals

Heisman
Apr 3, 2018
10,881
13,184
0
I just don't get it personally. Forget about the risk factors for a moment - you physically can't get out and walk the ocean floor and actually touch the titanic - which would be quite amazing I would think. It's like paying a huge amount to visit the statue of liberty but all you can do is look at it through your car window from the parking lot. I don't mean to insult the folks who did it in a very scary situation - I just don't honestly understand why you'd spend 250k other than some weird bragging rights. And that's putting aside the risk factors.
This is more like taking a helicopter ride past the Statue ...or a roadless part of Alaska you won't see any other way.
 

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
This should have been fairly tame. Nothing crazy about it, imo, save for not properly vetting the company and equipment.
The pressure at the site of the Titanic is 390 times more than at the surface. Thats an insane amount and there is nothing tame about it. The further down they went, the higher those pressures became. Did I hear the sub ws not designed for over 1600 feet or something near? Going another 10,000+ feet more than it's designed for would be absolute stupidity. I'll guess a window blowout or the whole sub crushed by the surrounding pressure on descent.
 

fsg2_rivals

Heisman
Apr 3, 2018
10,881
13,184
0
The pressure at the site of the Titanic is 390 times more than at the surface. Thats an insane amount and there is nothing tame about it. The further down they went, the higher those pressures became. Did I hear the sub ws not designed for over 1600 feet or something near? Going another 10,000+ feet more than it's designed for would be absolute stupidity. I'll guess a window blowout or the whole sub crushed by the surrounding pressure on descent.
Yeah, but you're paying 250K for someone else to take care of all that. It's not like commissioning and captaining your own vessel.

You expect to dive down, see some cool history, and come on back up to everyday life.
 

SouthJerseyRU

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2002
4,749
3,087
113
Are video game controllers poorly engineered? How would you know if that custom & expensive looking pilot console is more or less reliable than a game controller that has been tried & true millions of times over? It's the same signals coming out the interface pins whether its a $50 8bitdo controller or a $5000 custom job. Yeah it's a bit unexpected but you think the computer mice at your local power plant are any more special than what's on your desk?

Yes video game controllers in particular ‘Logitech’ controllers are poorly engineered if you will. As someone who has played video games all my life I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve replaced controllers due to buttons sticking, popping out, and simply no longer working.

Keep in mind, they didn’t even pony up for actual PlayStation controllers, these were $29.99 knockoffs available at Walmart. Yes, there’s a HUGE problem with controlling a vessel containing people in a life death situation with nothing more than a knockoff PlayStation controller to steer the thing. I’d say the fact that this is happening is pretty clear evidence that that alone is a GIANT red flag!

As @yessir321 points outs, yes some controllers are poorly engineered. However, like most things in life there is good and bad. The first gen Nintendo Switch controller developed drift after a few months, but I still have a 360 controller that my kid uses that is older then he is. The current PS5 controllers are pretty awesome as well. Logitech, 8bit-do and other 3rd parties are hit and miss.

Now, there are uses for those in various applications that I have no problem with using gaming controllers. I would say a submarine isn't one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okieKnight908

SouthJerseyRU

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2002
4,749
3,087
113
One thing I don't get is why people would want to be locked into this space. I don't like being in an elevator going up a few floors with more than 2 people, I can't imagine being in a space like this where you can barely move with 4 others.

 

RutgersK1d

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2020
909
1,104
73
Just speaking from a controller aspect, most of , if not all wireless controllers have a manual capability where you can plug it in. I saw one video of them working inside of the sub and it was essentially several computers that one would assume actually manages the inputs from the controller. I would hope that they designed a way to plug in and control the sub manually at the very least. Again this is pure speculation and common sense. I could be totally wrong. Praying for a miracle for these folks.
 

RutgersK1d

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2020
909
1,104
73
One thing I don't get is why people would want to be locked into this space. I don't like being in an elevator going up a few floors with more than 2 people, I can't imagine being in a space like this where you can barely move with 4 others.

Yea I wondered why they would seal it from the outside. Could it be a panic thing where they fear someone would panic and attempt to open the hatch underwater? Could it be a pressure thing where it needs to be bolted from the outside which keeps the bolts pressured down instead of backing the bolts out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
6,079
6,719
113
One thing I don't get is why people would want to be locked into this space. I don't like being in an elevator going up a few floors with more than 2 people, I can't imagine being in a space like this where you can barely move with 4 others.

That's the thing I can't wrap my head around. We are talking Billionaires. Why would you go out of your way to make yourself uncomfortable sitting cross legged for 10 hours, when you could buy the exclusive experience for $1M. These are the same people that pay a washed up rocker multiple millions to play at their birthday party. From a risk perspective you would think a buyout would be recommended.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDead

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
Yea I wondered why they would seal it from the outside. Could it be a panic thing where they fear someone would panic and attempt to open the hatch underwater? Could it be a pressure thing where it needs to be bolted from the outside which keeps the bolts pressured down instead of backing the bolts out?

The hatch, by necessity, has to be constructed in such as way that the pressure of the depths helps to push it closed, so that it uses the pressure to maintain a better seal.

This is, FWIW, the exact opposite of how aircraft doors work, where the pressure *inside* the cabin pushes the doors against their seals. It's also the reason why you cannot physically open an aircraft door when it's at altitude and the cabin is pressurised.

To design such a hatch so that it opens from the inside requires "through-hulls" (technically "through-hatch") through which the handle mechanisms are run. This introduces an additional point of weakness / leakage. Combined with the fact that there's no reason to open the hatch from the inside, it's an easy call from a design perspective to have a hatch that only opens from the outside.
 

RutgersK1d

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2020
909
1,104
73
The hatch, by necessity, has to be constructed in such as way that the pressure of the depths helps to push it closed, so that it uses the pressure to maintain a better seal.

This is, FWIW, the exact opposite of how aircraft doors work, where the pressure *inside* the cabin pushes the doors against their seals. It's also the reason why you cannot physically open an aircraft door when it's at altitude and the cabin is pressurised.

To design such a hatch so that it opens from the inside requires "through-hulls" (technically "through-hatch") through which the handle mechanisms are run. This introduces an additional point of weakness / leakage. Combined with the fact that there's no reason to open the hatch from the inside, it's an easy call from a design perspective to have a hatch that only opens from the outside.
Makes sense. I figured it was a pressure thing.
 

iReC89

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2014
2,386
1,807
78
I just don't get it personally. Forget about the risk factors for a moment - you physically can't get out and walk the ocean floor and actually touch the titanic - which would be quite amazing I would think. It's like paying a huge amount to visit the statue of liberty but all you can do is look at it through your car window from the parking lot. I don't mean to insult the folks who did it in a very scary situation - I just don't honestly understand why you'd spend 250k other than some weird bragging rights. And that's putting aside the risk factors.
it's like exploring the Hudson from the Lincoln tunnel, except the Lincoln tunnel experience probably cost smore per minute over the whole expedition.
 

ClassOf02v.2

Heisman
Sep 30, 2010
13,599
14,876
103
if they are still alive I can't imagine the smell inside that thing
Yeah, I don’t know why, but I keep thinking that too. What was supposed to be a 7 hour day trip with maybe one bathroom visit for each person has now turned into days of unshowered people and human waste.
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
One thing I don't get is why people would want to be locked into this space. I don't like being in an elevator going up a few floors with more than 2 people, I can't imagine being in a space like this where you can barely move with 4 others.

I'm with you but others aren't bothered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet1984

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,672
35,986
113
If they are found and not alive I hope it was a catastrophic failure at the onset it was over quickly.
implosion at that depth is 19,000 mph or 8300 meters per second. They'd be jelly before they even knew it which is most likely what happened. Materials, design, maintenance, technical know how of the crew, etc is all on the wrong side here
 

RutgersK1d

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2020
909
1,104
73
implosion at that depth is 19,000 mph or 8300 meters per second. They'd be jelly before they even knew it which is most likely what happened. Materials, design, maintenance, technical know how of the crew, etc is all on the wrong side here
In that scenario, will they even find debris?
 

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
14,885
17,613
113
Reports stating a "debris field" has been discovered by an ROV in the search area. No specifics on what type of debris.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh

dconifer0

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2004
4,253
3,275
113
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

Barnaby&Neill

All-American
Dec 10, 2010
6,946
7,534
81
The hatch, by necessity, has to be constructed in such as way that the pressure of the depths helps to push it closed, so that it uses the pressure to maintain a better seal.

This is, FWIW, the exact opposite of how aircraft doors work, where the pressure *inside* the cabin pushes the doors against their seals. It's also the reason why you cannot physically open an aircraft door when it's at altitude and the cabin is pressurised.

To design such a hatch so that it opens from the inside requires "through-hulls" (technically "through-hatch") through which the handle mechanisms are run. This introduces an additional point of weakness / leakage. Combined with the fact that there's no reason to open the hatch from the inside, it's an easy call from a design perspective to have a hatch that only opens from the outside.

Saw an air disaster show about the outward opening cargo hatches on the DC-10. As you can guess by the show title, a flaw associated with this design caused a disaster.