Others following Towles and leave the program

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,857
60,188
113
This is a joke right?!

Copied from @GusVanRan on HOB:
"He had a lot of bad drops this season, but...

was 6th in the SEC in receptions (55), 14th in receiving yards (608), and 6th in receptions/game (4.6). He also averaged 11 yards per reception.

If not for Garrett Johnson's 694 receiving yards this season, Baker's 608 yards would be the most yards by a UK receiver since 2010 (Chris Matthews 925 and Cobb 1017). Cobb is now a Pro Bowl caliber player, and Matthews was a senior.

Promising future, especially if he begins to consistently catches the ball."

And all of this was done as a Sophomore. One of the most physically gifted WR's UK has ever had.

Stop with the facts, already!
 

ukalum1988

Heisman
Dec 21, 2014
12,084
31,207
113
Tough to block when blocking too hard may get you suspended BY YOUR OWN COACHES.

I still think that decision was the beginning of the end (to date) of this staff as a whole. Who suspends players for hitting to hard?

I never understood that decision either. I'll skip the back-story, but my family and I attended the 2014 UK-LSU game when Baker laid out Kendall Beckwith while protecting Towles. We were in a LSU luxury suite, and one of the LSU fans I was sitting with actually complimented Baker for making a hard clean hit.

To my dismay, Stoops essentially suspended Baker for the first half of the following week's against State. He never provided a real explanation of why. If I was HC, I would back my players and if the SEC office wanted to suspend him, I would have made the SEC make it public instead of unilaterally suspending him to appease the league office.

I do remember Baker making a key crushing block on a ULL player on the winning touchdown (Horton?) late in the game, but as the season progressed his performance deteriorated badly. I would hate to see him leave. If I'm Stoops, having a man-to-man talk with Baker is of one of my top priorities.
 

BBBLazing

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2009
4,888
4,388
0


Do you people really not see this as a launch, head to head hit? I don't agree with the targeting rule and its application a lot, but I've seen a lot of cleaner hits than this result in ejections and suspensions.
 

CatsFanGG24

Heisman
Dec 22, 2003
22,267
27,137
0
It isn't speculation that Stoops suspended him for that block. It is speculation that the suspension caused problems. But this would be a dead place if only known facts were posted.



Nope. He lead with his shoulder. He could've damn near killed the guy had he lead with his helmet. It was a block that should've drawn praises from the staff, not suspensions.

I know
SEC office threatened the suspension and Stoops went along with it. I have heard that Stoops praised Baker for the block in private because he believed it being clean and aggressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKCatNnc
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
Again, something that is pure speculation.
What is said, what reasons are given inside the locker room and out of the locker room is often 180 degrees opposed.

The was definitely suspended for the block. The rest is speculation but its a message board. If only proven facts were discussed, this place would cease to exist.



Do you people really not see this as a launch, head to head hit? I don't agree with the targeting rule and its application a lot, but I've seen a lot of cleaner hits than this result in ejections and suspensions.


Nope. He lead with the shoulder. If he lead with his helmet it would've damn near killed the guy. Was a block that should've drawn praise, not suspension.

Of course the league was probably going to suspend him, but if youre the coach you need to stand by your player; or publicly say we are only suspending him because the league forced us to.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
SEC office threatened the suspension and Stoops went along with it. I have heard that Stoops praised Baker for the block in private because he believed it being clean and aggressive.

I suspect that's true. I intended to post just that before I accidentally hit send lol. But....I still think you make the league take action and stand behind the player.
 

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
19,338
38,971
113
I don't think the kid has any reason to read your posts, but just in case, I want him to know most UK fans are not dumb enough to want him to leave.
You don't have the first clue what most UK fans think. And having read your dim witted posts over the years, I take your post as a compliment.
 
Last edited:

ukalum1988

Heisman
Dec 21, 2014
12,084
31,207
113
The was definitely suspended for the block. The rest is speculation but its a message board. If only proven facts were discussed, this place would cease to exist.



Nope. He lead with the shoulder. If he lead with his helmet it would've damn near killed the guy. Was a block that should've drawn praise, not suspension.

Of course the league was probably going to suspend him, but if youre the coach you need to stand by your player; or publicly say we are only suspending him because the league forced us to.

Agreed. Like I said earlier, the LSU fan I was with at the game (an old school football guy) had no problem with Baker's hit.
 

ZakkW

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
4,633
4,803
113
Tough to block when blocking too hard may get you suspended BY YOUR OWN COACHES.

I still think that decision was the beginning of the end (to date) of this staff as a whole. Who suspends players for hitting to hard?

Spot-on post and a woefully forgotten/under-discussed incident. IMO, the suspension raised questions among players as to whether the coach 'has their back'. Also served to deter aggression and a 'play to the echo of the whistle' attitude. IMO.
 

theoledog

All-Conference
Nov 21, 2008
4,306
1,444
0


Do you people really not see this as a launch, head to head hit? I don't agree with the targeting rule and its application a lot, but I've seen a lot of cleaner hits than this result in ejections and suspensions.

No I don't... Looks cleaner the more I see it... like poster said above... "let the SEC make the calL"
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueRattie_rivals

UKCatNnc

All-Conference
Sep 30, 2005
6,163
1,736
0
Number 18 needs to go folks along with number 2, they are not all conference players, so no need to tell me how great they are, one quit the team, the other blatantly dogged it......

Addition by subtraction...
Personally, I am looking forward to Williams and Baker making big contributions next year. Go Cats!!
 

CHAMPCAT11

All-American
Jun 16, 2009
10,001
7,566
0
Yeah, I said a few days ago on here that PT would be the first of many high profile transfers as our program implodes. All due to Stoops inability to properly lead.

Totally agree with this. This team, both players and coaches, is a mess. This 'could' end up worse than the Joker fiasco.
 

BlueRaider22

All-American
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
9,058
0
This ship has been going in one direction for 60 years. There have been about 10 different AD's in that time. Have you ever thought that perhaps the issues go above the level of AD?

Moreover, Mitch has helped to expand and groom almost every other sport at UK....do you think he wants to neglect a sport that is one of the (if not the) #1 revenue sport?
 

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,153
68,965
113
Agreed. Like I said earlier, the LSU fan I was with at the game (an old school football guy) had no problem with Baker's hit.
I had no problem with Baker's hit. It was a great hit ... it was the incessant trash talking while down 40 pts that irked me ... I speculate that irk'd CMS too.
 

BBBLazing

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2009
4,888
4,388
0
I never said I had a problem with the hit. I said I disagree with the rule. But, it was a head to head hit. He did launch. It could be interpreted, evidently was interpreted by someone as a targeting. I don't have a problem with a coach teaching a young player how to stay in a game when he is older when it matters.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
Spot-on post and a woefully forgotten/under-discussed incident. IMO, the suspension raised questions among players as to whether the coach 'has their back'. Also served to deter aggression and a 'play to the echo of the whistle' attitude. IMO.

Agree. Football is a team sport, and that doesnt mean the team is limited to what happens on the field. This coach didnt have their back, or at least Baker's back. That made a big difference imo.

No I don't... Looks cleaner the more I see it... like poster said above... "let the SEC make the calL"

Me too. Honestly in re-watching it Im surprised. I remembered a much closer call. Clearly a good block imo.
 
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
You can't really believe this? Why would an AD not want to win in a meaningful way? That is completely illogical. Every AD desperately wants to win. No AD would set goals to be mediocre. That is just a ridiculous notion. Building a football program at UK is an extremely difficult job and when you say that the AD just doesn't care or we could build a winning program, it ignores that fact and disrespects the effort that everyone associated with the program puts into trying to change what has historically been a bottom feeder. The shape of the this program isn't on the current AD. It has been this way for decades and it will take something extraordinary to change it.
Thank you for a brief moment of sanity and truthful reflection.
 

kentucky_wildcat_#1

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2003
33,780
1,041
0
As long as it's none of our future playmakers, who cares! Some of these guys will probably need to just give up football. Not to be cruel, but let's be real here for a second. If you can't get playing time on a team like Kentucky, what in the world makes you think you're good enough to go anywhere else and play? Guys transfer after every single football season. I just hope it's none of the guys we are depending on turning this sinking ship around. If it is, we have more problems than everyone thinks and i'm not sure what it would take to fix things. Throwing big time money out there and going after the big boys is the only obvious answer.
 

mtn cat1

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
4,258
1,523
0
Maybe you have trouble with reading comprehension so I will spell it out for you. IMO means "in my opinion". I have no inside knowledge nor do I know anyone associated with the program. I do know what I have seen on the field and on the sideline with my own eyes. He mailed it in on numerous blocks he was supposed to make and his attitude was clear to me. It isn't about the drops. The issue is much bigger than that.

Irishcat1965, reference back to the LSU Game of '14, note the tremendous block by Baker, LEGAL BLOCK -so stated by the LSU Player- Baker was demoted to the bench for the next game!!! I don't know if was intervention by M. Barnhart, or if it was a decision made Stoops alone, but it SURELY SENT A STRONG MESSAGE AS TO WHAT WAS EXPECTED BY OUR ATHLETES!!!!!!!
That is not a debatable assertion, go back and review that event and then view the subsequent events that have ensued!!!!! Aggressive blocks as well as tackles have been a wonton but futile endeavor for the team as a whole since that occurrence!!!!!!!
 

Rawrrr

Freshman
Oct 18, 2010
1,558
83
0
This ship has been going in one direction for 60 years. There have been about 10 different AD's in that time. Have you ever thought that perhaps the issues go above the level of AD?
And all of them, including the current, basketball AD's. Football is an afterthought unless microwave fans stage a protest or something, can't lose that seat revenue.
 

.S&C.

All-American
Jul 8, 2014
45,292
6,422
0
You're completely clueless. If football was winning it would mean $10's of millions of more $$ and thus allow athletics to do a lot of the things they'd like to do like finally build the baseball stadium they have been wanting for the last 15 years.
Winning only makes the job easier and more pleasant. Anyone who says that Mitch or any other AD "doesn't care" is a clueless idiot.

Mitch Barnhart doesn't give a rats *** about winning big for UK.

If you're too dumb to see it, after all the time you've had, walk the cliff.

Useless.
 

BARBQGRILLER

Redshirt
Apr 26, 2006
133
39
0
Funny that it took OOPS , I mean Stoops after the end of season 3 to come out and say we have to tougher Mentally ! 12-24 after 3 years and has 1 less win then the Joke ! Thanks Barnfart !
 

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
19,338
38,971
113
Irishcat1965, reference back to the LSU Game of '14, note the tremendous block by Baker, LEGAL BLOCK -so stated by the LSU Player- Baker was demoted to the bench for the next game!!! I don't know if was intervention by M. Barnhart, or if it was a decision made Stoops alone, but it SURELY SENT A STRONG MESSAGE AS TO WHAT WAS EXPECTED BY OUR ATHLETES!!!!!!!
That is not a debatable assertion, go back and review that event and then view the subsequent events that have ensued!!!!! Aggressive blocks as well as tackles have been a wonton but futile endeavor for the team as a whole since that occurrence!!!!!!!
I don't understand why you have pulled me into this LSU block issue. I never commented on it and had frankly forgotten it even occurred. Personally I see nothing wrong with that block he made. I was referring to the many blocks he didn't make the effort on. In fact during the Vandy game, Andre Ware made mention of his lack of effort.
 

screwduke

All-Conference
Mar 23, 2015
2,658
2,032
0
I never said I had a problem with the hit. I said I disagree with the rule. But, it was a head to head hit. He did launch. It could be interpreted, evidently was interpreted by someone as a targeting. I don't have a problem with a coach teaching a young player how to stay in a game when he is older when it matters.

Head to head hit? [laughing] I think you need glasses
 

uk_fan_in_tn

Redshirt
Nov 19, 2008
4,088
36
0
Doubt many, if any, would disagree with you.
I would have to disagree. I want Baker to mature and become a leader on this team. He's a true sophomore, so he's still got growing up to do. It'd be foolish to just give up on him now, he still had a very good year despite some drops. I'd much rather him see improve here than somewhere else.
 

BlueRaider22

All-American
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
9,058
0
My only complaint about Baker is more about his attitude than anything else. Sure, I don't like dropped footballs, but it's not like most fresh/sophs have glue hands. I really don't like watching him shut down his routes. I don't like that he gives up on balls that are off the mark. When you play sports, your task is to do your job with maximal effort. It shouldn't matter who the QB is, where the ball is placed, what play is called, how many balls are thrown your way.......you should provide maximal effort at all times and do whatever it takes to help the team.
 

law1127

All-Conference
Dec 20, 2004
2,737
2,886
0
Need to play Charles Walker more, he is a possession receiver that will catch what's thrown in his direction!
 

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
Need to play Charles Walker more, he is a possession receiver that will catch what's thrown in his direction!

Baker, Badet, Bone don't always run their routes correctly which is why Walker is playing. Watch him...he pretty much does everything right. Unfortunate he isn't faster or bigger. I'm hoping with his continued development and the addition of the RS WRs we'll see less and less of the Bees if they continue their sandbagging.
 
Sep 8, 2009
7,959
465
0
Its
You're completely clueless. If football was winning it would mean $10's of millions of more $$ and thus allow athletics to do a lot of the things they'd like to do like finally build the baseball stadium they have been wanting for the last 15 years.
Winning only makes the job easier and more pleasant. Anyone who says that Mitch or any other AD "doesn't care" is a clueless idiot.
Its not that he doesnt care, its that he is too conservative to go all in and do what it takes to win. Hes been trying to do it on the cheap the whole time, and its just his nature to do so. Mitch does not understnd what ittke to win at the highest level in fb.
 

fuzz77

All-Conference
Sep 19, 2012
12,163
1,423
0
Its

Its not that he doesnt care, its that he is too conservative to go all in and do what it takes to win. Hes been trying to do it on the cheap the whole time, and its just his nature to do so. Mitch does not understnd what ittke to win at the highest level in fb.
If it were up to Mitch then athletics wouldn't be spending $65 million to build academic buildings and instead he would have invested that money back into athletics. It took "agreeing" to do so (facts be known the BoT has ultimate say so over the athletics budget and it possesses the power to spend athletics monies as it pleases, it doesn't require that the AD approve) in order to get approval to the latest spending on the stadium and football training center.

So today you claim he is too conservative and trying to do it on the cheap...back a few years ago the plan to update the stadium, add a "recruiting room" and other upgrades to football were shot down by the BoT and state legislature and Mitch was blamed for trying to do too much.

Again, UK's football troubles are 60 years old and spans about 10 different ADs...I guess you think they were all "too conservative and trying to do it on the cheap"?
Again, I'd like you to consider that perhaps the issues that have worked against football at UK are beyond the control of any AD.
You like many fans believe that ADs have a lot more power and control than what they actually possess. They can only submit budgets, they cannot approve them. There is a hard limit to their spending power without the approval of the President of the university, the BoT and the state legislature.
 

OHIO COLONEL

Heisman
Feb 11, 2009
14,803
59,401
0
I've been very disappointed in Stoops so far, but hope he can turn it around. And I've never been a big Barnhart fan (don't really know why, just not. Perhaps too much attention given to minor sports? BCG hire? Seemed to be fumbling the football hire before turning to Brooks who was out of coaching and who he knew from Oregon days). But I wonder if all these folks who are saying that Barnhart doesn't want to win in Football were saying the same thing in '06 and '07? Barnhart did hire Brooks. We were 8-5 both years. Beat Clemson and FSU in bowl games. Got up to No. 8 in the nation in one poll partway thru the season. Somehow, if we could go back in the archives for this board...I doubt there was a lot of complaining. So was Barnhart not interested in winning back then and it was all Brooks?
 

CloverforkCat

Junior
Jun 3, 2013
15,342
277
0
I guarantee you that Boom leaving would be infinitely more "subtraction" than "addition". He's easily the best offensive threat we've had since Cobb.

You are correct, Boom is a HR hitter, who can go the distance on any play. Boom leaving would sabatoge the offense beyond repair. Barker at QB is a Missouri..... he has to ' Show me '