Out of the 14 SEC schools..
- Thread starter sbcmortgageman
- Start date
OM - Yes
Ark - No
LSU - No
Aub - Last year no, This year yes (cause of the offensive scheme)
Bama - No
aTm - Yes
Vandy - Yes
UK - Yes
TN - No
USCe - No
UGA - No
UF - Yes
Mizzou - Maybe. Franklin is a good fit there.
6 that he would
6 that he wouldn't
1 that is maybe
Metterberger is about the only one I could see an argument for him starting over that I have him listed as not starting over. He wouldn't play over Bray, Wilson, McCarron, Murray, and Shaw.
Ark - No
LSU - No
Aub - Last year no, This year yes (cause of the offensive scheme)
Bama - No
aTm - Yes
Vandy - Yes
UK - Yes
TN - No
USCe - No
UGA - No
UF - Yes
Mizzou - Maybe. Franklin is a good fit there.
6 that he would
6 that he wouldn't
1 that is maybe
Metterberger is about the only one I could see an argument for him starting over that I have him listed as not starting over. He wouldn't play over Bray, Wilson, McCarron, Murray, and Shaw.
Really? I've seen him play twice in the SEC now and he sucks. Mizzou is not playing their best QB. I'll be surprised if Franklin holds on to his job much longer.
He'd have a shot at just about all of them.....
....except for Georgia and Arkansas, who are starting seniors. I don't see why he couldn't have beaten out Mettenberger, Driskel, or even McCarron had he been at Alabama since 2009.
....except for Georgia and Arkansas, who are starting seniors. I don't see why he couldn't have beaten out Mettenberger, Driskel, or even McCarron had he been at Alabama since 2009.
The thing is- you would have to think that some of those schools if they had Tyler, they may not have the guy that they have now. And vice versa. Like South Carolina may not have Conner Shaw.
I hope that makes sense.
I hope that makes sense.
No argument from me on questioning it. I'm definitely high on Franklin. I think he's going to be really good.
Serious question. What have you seen that makes you think he's going to be good? He has no touch at all on his passes (is it possible to have negative touch) and he slow as Christmas, both running the ball and on his realease throwing it. Not to mention the team doesn't seem to respond to him at all. Their offense has looked a lot better when Berkstresser was playing.
Most people give him the benefit of the doubt....
....for two reasons.
1) He did pretty good last year.
2) He's played two SEC games against damn good defenses.
It's really that simple.
....for two reasons.
1) He did pretty good last year.
2) He's played two SEC games against damn good defenses.
It's really that simple.