Physical teams to me are teams who can still get good push by the offensive line and run it down your throat whether you try putting eight or more in the box or not. Doesn't matter the formation. Bird, Salem, older Amherst, Phoebus and Hampton teams, last year's Hanover, Lake Taylor, Stone Bridge, Riverheads, Giles, and Centreville are examples. Finesse teams to me can be teams who say they are run first or want to be run first, but usually have to be successful passing to open up the run. Or they like to run a lot of screens, bubble screens or quick passes. Flashy stuff. If you have to spread teams out to get more running lanes, you're not physical IMO, regardless of line size. If a team can line up and pound good teams with the I or Singleback, then go to a spread or pistol and do the same thing, even if they are not a good passing team, that's physical to me. Last year's Hanover is a good example of a team that would've pounded you, no matter what formation they ran.According to some posters on here you aren't a physical team unless you run a Power I, option or Wing T. James Monroe a 3a school lost two games to 4a foes Chancellor and Dinwiddie (#3 and #1 seed in their east pod) and got better as the season progressed. I am not saying they will advance far in the playoffs (have no clue), but Coach Serbay, his staff and team deserve to be extremely proud of their accomplishments thus far.
In truth, I really don't understand how the word finesse (subtle or delicate manner) relates to football. It drives me nuts when posters says a team is not "physical" Physical has numerous meanings, but one that seems to fit is forceful and laborious. The last time I checked a counter was a counter, a sweep was a sweep, a draw was a draw and a pass was a pass. What difference does the set actually make? The reality is many teams utilize the pistol and spread the field to open up space and reduce the interior seven to five. This 5 vs.5 interior scheme helps smaller offensive lines create running lanes. Just like JM, Dinwiddie utilizes this scheme and the run is still the primary weapon. I guess the critique comes from the thought that a spread team cannot be a "smash mouth" team. It's no different than when some say "smash mouth teams can't pass". We all know that is not necessarily true and the sword cuts both ways. Being balanced and able to exploit your opponents weaknesses is the key. Heck, if you run it 50 times a game and win great. Pass it 50 times and win great again.
Football is football. 11 vs. 11 smacking heads. Some dodge and some run over you. I guess that's the difference. Good luck to JM and all of the non-conformist spread teams.lol.
JM look any different to you today @BleedingNavy? It seems to me they've changed some of their philosophy. And I think we aren't getting the full story on KG, I see a couple of missing players from the team I saw against Louisa... I also see a lot of KG beating themselves.
BN, you also said to me through inbox when talking about Dinwiddie's out of district schedule of next year, something along the lines of "with our luck, those teams will suck". That implies to me that you feel inside that this year's OOD teams on your schedule aren't good. Otherwise, why the heck would you say that, but act like the OOD teams are so good this year on the board?
Last edited: