POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

vhcat1970

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
1,698
1,253
113
it says my opinion is FB is the greatest, but many other Kentuckians, for generations, love BB first.
I don't fault them, i like uk hoops too.
Thanks and true. But it also indirectly says this puts UK FB at a permanent disadvantage in resources allocation and perceptions. Stating what I think is obvious, I love FB first - 41 years season ticket holder - & wish resources were allocated more towards it. Sad for me that our FB is always fighting an uphill battle even internally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Jul 6, 2025
862
3,933
93
Bigblue, my post you responded too had nothing to do with some fans wanting to throw the ball all the time haha. Did you mean to respond to someone else's post?

No i just didn't do well enough explaining the connection. Despite that horrible play, that team had a great year by UK standards. UK fans remember that as a year led by Lorenzen, but it was actually Artose Pinner and the run game that drove that offense. Lorenzen had way fewer pass attempts and many were play action.

We weren't bowl eligible because of probation, but we had a very good season because of a balanced/run favored attack.
 

vhcat1970

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
1,698
1,253
113
The talent is diluted now. There is no elite teams in the SEC now, there aren’t any in any league. They used to stack 5* players on top of each other , that ain’t happening now.
Mizzou and Bama game could’ve gone either way. Indiana is a legit title contender after making the playoffs last year.
Texas Tech very well could win the title this year.
And this has nothing to do with UK. As long as we insist on spending disproportionately - vs. other schools - on hoops over growing the pie by showing our emotional & intellectual commitment to football, we won't reach the football level of other non-traditional powers that have. Very obvious to me.
 

vhcat1970

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
1,698
1,253
113
The ceiling for UK Football is, always HAS been, and for the foreseeable future, remains at consistent winning seasons. In this environment that means SEVEN wins. 6 and 6 plus and bowl win don't count.

That is exceedingly difficult, when you consider that you only get 3 "automatic" wins a year now.

Let's be generous, and say that you split, on average, with UL. You need to average 3.5 SEC wins per year.

Look up how many times, in the last 60 years, Kentucky has won more than 3 SEC games in a season.

(it's 11 times. for a whopping 18 percent.)

Correction (based on my research and not AI's) it's actually NINE times. For a dismal and uninspiring FIFTEEN percent.

And only 8 seasons, if you don't count the vacated 2021 wins, for an even worse THIRTEEN percent.
The foreseeable future is such because we don't have commitment to football across the board - admin & fans.
 

vhcat1970

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
1,698
1,253
113
My father unleashed a torrent of obscenities when Cris Collinsworth caught a disputed pass down the sideline that set up a winning Florida FG in 1980. The Clown's jaw had to be picked up off the ground.

I met Collinsworth in Cincy one time in the late 2000's while standing in line at First Watch, and shared that story with him. He got a big kick out of it (of course), and picked up the tab for me and my wife. LOL

The Bluegrass Miracle though... THAT was when I really started to think that my Dad and I should start thinking about not attending games anymore. LOL The old man... well; I'd never seen him that dis-heartened.
Ran into him skiing at Perfect North Slopes 30 years ago. Only recognized him because there are few 6-6 skiers.
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,222
95,618
113
In 2002 I was a student at UK, I was at every Kentucky home football game that year, but the Bluegrass Miracle.

I was at home in western Kentucky and was watching the game with my dad (who loves Kentucky football more than basketball, was a football season ticket holder from the 1970s until just a few years ago.)

When LSU scored, my dad didn't say a word, he walked out at the back door and wasn't seen for hours. He owned about 100 acres back then, I don't know where he went. His truck was still there, I asked him years later where he went and he couldn't remember haha. It was like he just walked out into the woods...despondent.
I was at that game. It was a microcosm of UK football history and the "Curse of the Bear" if you will. But glad we got our payback 5 years later, was at that game too.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,394
39,377
113
And this has nothing to do with UK. As long as we insist on spending disproportionately - vs. other schools - on hoops over growing the pie by showing our emotional & intellectual commitment to football, we won't reach the football level of other non-traditional powers that have. Very obvious to me.
Sure it does, if you have a coach that has a history of boring offense, a string of subpar Qb's, and yearly OC change out, on top of the embarrassing Texas A&M debacle it's gonna be hard to get quality transfers.

The path to an SEC title or Championship appearance is much easier now than just 5 years ago for UK, with the right coaching staff.
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,222
95,618
113
Like I've said many times. Most of Stoops' problems are a function of being a defensive-minded/DC coordinator HC at Kentucky. That, IMO, puts you behind the 8-ball from the start. Offense is exponentially more difficult to build and sustain than a defense. It makes sense then, that you need the guy that IS going to be here year in and year out, to be the lynchpin of that system.

I'm not saying you have to take a flyer on a radically different guy like Mumme (who DID know how to run an offense, but had none of the other skills a HC needs). It can be just about any system, as long as it is consistent, year after year after year.

It's a lot more important at a place like UK, than it is at powerhouse programs, where talent can sometimes overcome the need for in-house player development that is geared towards a system that they know will be the same in their junior year as it was when they first got here.

Just my 2 cents.

Our fanbase is sore as hell, watching what Cignetti is doing at IU, and thinking, "How can effing Indiana do it and we can't?"

Look at Cignetti's background, and which side of the ball he specializes in...

Look at Brohm/UL

Look at MOST coaches that have success at programs that are not "traditional" powers...

This is also why I don't agree with the Jon Sumrall worship. I don't think he'd be a good hire for Kentucky.
Seeing Cignetti's success is definitely a bitter pill to swallow because IU has been even worse than us historically. Before last year they only had two 9 win seasons in their entire history, zero 10 win seasons. But it does give hope that it can be done with the right hire. How long will IU be able to sustain that level of success though? Will this just be a 3-4 year thing before they drop back into the pits of despair? Cignetti is 64 years old he won't be there forever.

As for Sumrall. There's some mixed feelings out there about him. Some are skeptical, and of course it's an unknown how he would fare in the SEC, but he's also on a whole lot of schools radars and everyone I hear on the TV or AM Radio, thinks he's one of the best and brightest up and coming coaches out there. Something has to be said for that. A lot of people said the same thing about Mark Pope as well. I know Basketball is a way different animal, but Pope still had to "prove" himself to us. Sumrall's record seems to be proving out, albeit at a tier lower. I'm all for giving the guy a chance.
 

wildcatdon

Heisman
Oct 17, 2012
9,741
11,881
113
Stoops has had a history of being a poor HC at UK, even w/ the 2 years that were an anomaly. Dismal SEC record; collapses in the second half of seasons; yearly issues w/ discipline; turnover rate of assistants; zero continuity from one year to the next.......just to name a few issues. He was a poor hire from day 1 and the last few years have simply been icing on the cake.
Well said.
 

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
30,410
212,783
113
No i just didn't do well enough explaining the connection. Despite that horrible play, that team had a great year by UK standards. UK fans remember that as a year led by Lorenzen, but it was actually Artose Pinner and the run game that drove that offense. Lorenzen had way fewer pass attempts and many were play action.

We weren't bowl eligible because of probation, but we had a very good season because of a balanced/run favored attack.

That 2002 team was incredibly close to being 9-3. Not only did the Bluegrass Miracle happen, but Lorenzen missed a wide open WR in the endzone late in South Carolina game. That team was 2 plays away from 9-3.

Pinner was great. 5 yards a carry that year. Was a beast.

I don't care how Kentucky wins, just win. When Brooks won on the road against Georgia or Auburn I remember a 3rd and 7 play where we handed the ball off to Locke and got the first down. How many times could UK win on the road in the SEC getting first downs 3rd and long on run plays?



I was at that game. It was a microcosm of UK football history and the "Curse of the Bear" if you will. But glad we got our payback 5 years later, was at that game too.

I was at the game when we beat LSU. Been to hundreds of games among multiple sports, that one is top five and regardless what games I go to here on out, it will always be top five.
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,222
95,618
113
Leach and Josh Heupel are proof of what the Mumme system "tree" can accomplish (IF you're willing to not IGNORE what is going on around you, and not hire "buddies")

I think the reticence to hire Leach instead of Stoops, back in the day (because of the Mumme "stain") was a mistake that we're still paying for. Yes, Leach had some issues at Tech, but here is the rub; that kind of stuff doesn't bother the REST of the SEC. And so you see where THAT gets you.
Not sure where Leach would have taken us, if we would have fared any better than MSU or Washington St. did under him? Sure we would have put up pinball numbers and broken all kinds of school records, but would that have translated into many more wins or SEC Championships? we might have gotten out of the gate a little quicker if he had been hired when Stoops was, but I think his ceiling would have been about where Stoops had us. While I agree we need an offensive minded coach, we also need one who values defense. That's the kind of coach IU got with Cignetti that has moved the needle for them.
 

SenseMaker_Cats

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
348
1,824
93
I don't care how Kentucky wins, just win.
I think this is true for most fans. Kentucky loves football and craves good football. I’m sure there are some pass happy nuts out there but the majority just want good football. Generalizing UK fans is wrong IMO. UK’s fans are no different than any other fan base. Silly to suggest otherwise if not a little bit arrogant and to blame UK fans in any way on the overall lack of success is just plain dumb.
 

HymanKaplan

All-American
Feb 22, 2024
1,321
7,723
113
Seeing Cignetti's success is definitely a bitter pill to swallow because IU has been even worse than us historically. Before last year they only had two 9 win seasons in their entire history, zero 10 win seasons. But it does give hope that it can be done with the right hire. How long will IU be able to sustain that level of success though? Will this just be a 3-4 year thing before they drop back into the pits of despair? Cignetti is 64 years old he won't be there forever.

Frankly, IU is a much easier place to win than Kentucky. The state has twice the population of Kentucky, the league is easier, and it's situated closer to major metropolitan recruiting centers.

Not saying IU is a piece of cake, but it's an exponentially easier job than Kentucky.

Kentucky truly IS one of the toughest major college coaching jobs in the country. Maybe the TOUGHEST.

And here is the kicker. It's getting harder every year, and that isn't going to change. It will continue to get more and more difficult. For reasons that UK can't control.

That's the straight dope. And, deep down, all of you/us know it. LOL
 

SenseMaker_Cats

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
348
1,824
93
Was on vacation with some friends in PCB(1997) and called around to where we could watch the game. Pineapple Willie’s said they had it on. My wife dropped us guys off and we walked into a Bama Alumni room. They were nice enough to invite us in. Just 4 Kentucky guys and one guy in a Tennessee shirt and the rest all Bama fans. My lasting memory is a guy sitting down with his elbow on his knees with his face in his hands. He looked up and said, “we can’t even beat Kentucky”. Probably my favorite game I wasn’t attending.
 

TheFrontRunner

Hall of Famer
Jun 4, 2019
30,410
212,783
113
I think this is true for most fans. Kentucky loves football and craves good football. I’m sure there are some pass happy nuts out there but the majority just want good football. Generalizing UK fans is wrong IMO. UK’s fans are no different than any other fan base. Silly to suggest otherwise if not a little bit arrogant and to blame UK fans in any way on the overall lack of success is just plain dumb.

I have known some 'pass happy nuts', also knew people that liked UK basketball but rooted for Ohio State football. If they did have interest in Kentucky football it was only when we had a good season going, but also loved to hate on UK football at the first bad loss.

Overall, Kentucky has had way more fan support for the football program then it deserved. Had years we were awful and top 30 in attendance.

The fanbase has been so traumatized that even with a double-digit lead when something bad happens the whole stadium groans, and expects the worst to happen.
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,222
95,618
113
Nope...just a long term position of seeing medicority accepted as some sort of success, which is what you are seeing w/ Stoops. He defines mediocrity, and watching the almighty dollar dictate UK's position w/ him is disgusting.

Cowyboys, Yankees....those were spawned as a youth, well before I knew their history. You should understand this w/ your cheesehead fanship (see Vince and Bart)

UNC.....too long a story to share on here.
Maybe we should share how our various fandoms came about.
MIne:
UK - Just born and raised into it. Parents were long time season ticket holders to UK football, and Dad took me to a couple of games a year starting in about 1976 or 77. I went to UK and never missed a game, football or basketball while I was there. When I graduated in '93, i got my own set of season tickets and have had them ever since.

Reds - Started as a kid in the 70's when I'd go visit my grandpa and we'd sit in the back den filled with the smoke from his no filter Pall Mall's watching the Big Red Machine. Watching Rose, Seaver, Bench, Foster, Perez, Morgan, Griffey, then on to guys like Driessen, Oester, Soto and others. Being a UK football fan has helped me cope with their decades of futility (outside of that 1990 season)

49ers - I wasn't a huge NFL fan as a little kid, but I had an uncle, My Dad's youngest sibling, who back around 1980 built a custom motorcycle from the ground up and then rode it all the way to California where he would end up living. He got a job with the San Francisco examiner in their printing department. then after they won their first Super Bowl that I watched with my Dad, My uncle Mike sent ME, not my Dad, the whole special edition newspaper that the Examiner put out for the game. That made me a Niner's fan from that day on. My Dad was always a Steeler's fan. My Uncle passed away last year from the same Colon Cancer my Dad passed away from in 2018.

Can't say I have a favorite NBA team. I don't watch NBA.
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,222
95,618
113
Todays dem party


Deport her. That's my response. Renounce her citizenship, she's in violation of the Oath she took when she became a citizen.

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,222
95,618
113
Frankly, IU is a much easier place to win than Kentucky. The state has twice the population of Kentucky, the league is easier, and it's situated closer to major metropolitan recruiting centers.

Not saying IU is a piece of cake, but it's an exponentially easier job than Kentucky.

Kentucky truly IS one of the toughest major college coaching jobs in the country. Maybe the TOUGHEST.

And here is the kicker. It's getting harder every year, and that isn't going to change. It will continue to get more and more difficult. For reasons that UK can't control.

That's the straight dope. And, deep down, all of you/us know it. LOL
If IU is easier to win at then why have they been historically worse than us, by quite a bit actually.