Poll: Where do you stand on Riley?
- Thread starter HuskerDana_rivals188993
- Start date
- Must have a winning season
- The defense needs to play lights out during conference play
- Must agree to offensive changes after season
I can't fathom wanting to give him 5 years no matter what. What if we literally go 2-10 this year?
I don't predict that will happen but come on.
I don't predict that will happen but come on.
I still dont think its too far fetched in year 3 that he wins the west.. that has always been the minimum i think should happen.. every division Nebraska has played in seems to be pretty weak.. overall. Really beat iowa and wisconsin. 2 losses still wins tbe west i believe.. the only acceptable loss on this years schedule imho is osu and penn state
5 years, The man has only been here 2.5 years.
4 years minimum is my standard for any coach absent a scandal. That said, I think the new AD will want to cut him loose even if the team somehow pulls out 7 wins....... if he is cut after an 8 win season, especially after this start, the new AD will have to take considerable heat and Nebraska will take another PR pounding.
I voted, win the west.
I was full of optimism for this season. I was getting in arguments with people about how we were going to turn the corner. Finally able to run his system, showed nads getting rid of poor coaching performers, and a perceived talent at QB.
Now, I'm sorry to say, I've lost confidence in Riley as a competitive coach.
I was full of optimism for this season. I was getting in arguments with people about how we were going to turn the corner. Finally able to run his system, showed nads getting rid of poor coaching performers, and a perceived talent at QB.
Now, I'm sorry to say, I've lost confidence in Riley as a competitive coach.
Wow... results are not what I was expecting. I guess I have crazier friends then I thought, but most on here think like me
So if we potentially win 2 this year and we win 2 next year you still think he should get five?
It's unlikely, but the point is, at what point do you say a coach doesn't deserve five? Or does that point not exist?