Possible Post Season

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,801
26,190
113
At this point, I think it's probable. I think 65% chance we get a bid. Got to win minimum of 5 SEC games, including the tournament. I think we get at least 4 in the regular season + whatever we get in the tournament.
 

The Peeper

Heisman
Feb 26, 2008
15,441
10,586
113
happy dumb and dumber GIF
 

ronpolk

All-Conference
May 6, 2009
9,151
4,754
113
4 wins over the next 2 weekends should get us in. It’s pretty typical for a 14-16 sec team to get in. As long as we don’t get swept by OM, 4 wins seems achievable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog and 3-2 Dawg

615dawg

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
6,635
3,594
113
WN predictor has us sweeping Missouri and taking 2 of 3 against Ole Miss. That puts our RPI at 37. Missouri is going to kill our RPI it seems.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,388
16,454
113
70%. We are as good as Ole Miss and we get them at home. We are better than Missouri.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,328
4,829
113
I will preface this by saying I have no clue, but it seems like sweeping the team that is currently tied for 12th in the SEC standings has a lot of people suddenly optimistic.

If sweeping the team that is 12th in the SEC, sweeping the team that is currently on whath I would assume is a historic 0-24 in conference right now, and taking one game from a team that is a respectable but not gaudy 13-11 in conference will really get us into the tournament, I would think people were overly despondent about the state of the season. That's not too far off what I would have expected us to do if we hadn't fired Lemonis. If I had to bet, I'd probably have bet dropping one v UK, dropping two at UM, and then sweeping Mizzou and missing the tournament.

ETA: That said, good on whoever made the decision to go ahead and sack Lemonis. If everybody is correct about our chances of making a regional, we had a real risk of backing in and then being in an awkward position as far as firing him. Firing him before some winnable games at the end of the season avoids that and makes it look like we got a boost from firing him and makes it look like we're not in such a bad position talent wise, he had just lost the team.
 

Willow Grove Dawg

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2016
7,266
4,232
113
50/50 - winning 4 of the last 6 will get us in the tourney, 3 out of 6 probably requires a couple of wins in Hoover. Recent History says we can 17 up a Missouri series especially on the road.
 
Last edited:

Perd Hapley

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
5,816
6,869
113
There’s not a definitive magic win number, but in general we need 15 regular season SEC wins to feel safe. If we take 2 of 3 from OM and 2 of 3 from Mizzou, that’s not a scenario anyone should feel good about with 14 wins….because we’d add a horrible loss to a glorified Sun Belt team and basically just hold serve at home against a middling OM team. Sweeping Mizzou and only taking 1 of 3 from OM would be a little bit better, but not much.

In general, I think we really need 5-1 down the stretch to feel safe. It sucks that we even have to play Missouri at all, honestly. If you told me we’d take 2 of 3 against OM this weekend, I’d just as soon take our chances with a 12-15 SEC record plus whatever we get in Hoover.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,801
26,190
113
I will preface this by saying I have no clue, but it seems like sweeping the team that is currently tied for 12th in the SEC standings has a lot of people suddenly optimistic.

If sweeping the team that is 12th in the SEC, sweeping the team that is currently on whath I would assume is a historic 0-24 in conference right now, and taking one game from a team that is a respectable but not gaudy 13-11 in conference will really get us into the tournament, I would think people were overly despondent about the state of the season. That's not too far off what I would have expected us to do if we hadn't fired Lemonis. If I had to bet, I'd probably have bet dropping one v UK, dropping two at UM, and then sweeping Mizzou and missing the tournament.

ETA: That said, good on whoever made the decision to go ahead and sack Lemonis. If everybody is correct about our chances of making a regional, we had a real risk of backing in and then being in an awkward position as far as firing him. Firing him before some winnable games at the end of the season avoids that and makes it look like we got a boost from firing him and makes it look like we're not in such a bad position talent wise, he had just lost the team.
I think Selmon may have been looking at the schedule when he fired Lemonis when he did. He had to go.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,801
26,190
113
There’s not a definitive magic win number, but in general we need 15 regular season SEC wins to feel safe. If we take 2 of 3 from OM and 2 of 3 from Mizzou, that’s not a scenario anyone should feel good about with 14 wins….because we’d add a horrible loss to a glorified Sun Belt team and basically just hold serve at home against a middling OM team. Sweeping Mizzou and only taking 1 of 3 from OM would be a little bit better, but not much.

In general, I think we really need 5-1 down the stretch to feel safe. It sucks that we even have to play Missouri at all, honestly. If you told me we’d take 2 of 3 against OM this weekend, I’d just as soon take our chances with a 12-15 SEC record plus whatever we get in Hoover.
I think we need 5 more SEC wins counting the tournament. As of today, I think we get South Carolina in 1st round. And I think 5 wins is very achievable.
 

3-2 Dawg

Junior
Jun 6, 2023
175
340
63
Took a look at the previous 4 seasons. Every team with a 14-16 record or better from the SEC has gotten in. 6 of 8 teams with a 13-17 record have gotten in and Bama got in one year with a 12-17 record. I’m sure there can be exceptions but seems like 14-16 gets you in.
 

3-2 Dawg

Junior
Jun 6, 2023
175
340
63
Florida was 13-17 last year and went to the CWS. Ole Miss was 14-16 when they won their title. Then you look at the fact 5 different SEC teams have won the last 5 titles. Prob hard to dismiss anyone SEC teams near the bubble line
 

GhostOfJackie

Senior
Apr 20, 2009
3,750
643
113
I honestly feel good about this weekend's home series against Ole Miss. We have owned this series for years and they usually find a way to come to Starkville and **** the bed. If we can take 2/3 against UM and 2/3 against Missouri we should be in. Our RPI just moved up 10 spots to #32 after the UK sweep. 4/6 games to finish the season should move us up a few more spots into the upper 20's, even if we drop one on the road to a terrible Missouri team.

That type of finish should move us off the "last 4 in" line and get us a solid 3 seed somewhere. If we **** the bed and go 2/6 to finish then we are probably out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

golferdog

Senior
Jan 1, 2024
972
767
93
50/50 - winning 4 of the last 6 will get us in the tourney, 3 out of 6 probably requires a couple of wins in Hoover. Recent History says we can 17 up a Missouri series especially on the road.
Mizzou has our number under Lemonis. Maybe this time we'll get them back and sweep them!
 

Perd Hapley

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
5,816
6,869
113
Took a look at the previous 4 seasons. Every team with a 14-16 record or better from the SEC has gotten in. 6 of 8 teams with a 13-17 record have gotten in and Bama got in one year with a 12-17 record. I’m sure there can be exceptions but seems like 14-16 gets you in.
You have to take that data with a grain of salt.

This is a totally new era and a new scheduling platform for baseball with UT and OU on board. It also just happens to be the year that has the worst baseball team in SEC history, and we play them in our final series.

Old format - there are 13 other teams. You play 10 of the 13. Any of the 13 can beat you on any given day. Impossible to avoid the strength of the league as a whole and get at or near .500 unless you earn it.

New format - there are 15 other teams, you only play 10 of the 15 teams. There are currently 7 firm hosts, with Alabama currently looking likely as an 8th. Ole Miss and OU possibly able to make 9 hosts if one of them finishes strong. Of the 7 firm hosts, MSU only played 3 of them. Of the 5 teams out of hosting contention (bottom of the league, pretty much), MSU plays 4 of them. They also play Mizzou, which essentially means they only play a 27-game SEC schedule.

Go check the Quad 1 record of all those previous 14 win SEC teams, and compare it to ours this year. What you’ll find is that they all have 8-10 wins because of schedule strength. We currently have 5. Also go check the RPI’s of those teams and you’ll find they all finished in Top 30 or thereabouts. We don’t have a path to doing that. There are 2 weeks left in the season, and we have exactly one series win over a team that is expected to make the field currently. The resume just isn’t there for us to feel good about 14 wins getting us in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSUDOG24

Willow Grove Dawg

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2016
7,266
4,232
113
If the committee starts disregarding series sweeps against Missouri as SEC wins, all of a sudden the resumes of Ole Miss, Florida, Oklahoma, & Alabama don't look that strong either.
 

Perd Hapley

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
5,816
6,869
113
If the committee starts disregarding series sweeps against Missouri as SEC wins, all of a sudden the resumes of Ole Miss, Florida, Oklahoma, & Alabama don't look that strong either.
Ole Miss - 12 Quad 1 wins
Florida - 9 Quad 1 wins
Oklahoma - 8 Quad 1 wins
Alabama - 11 Quad 1 wins

MSU - 5 Quad 1 wins

It’s not about disregarding the series sweep. The issue in MSU’s case is we need quality wins, and there’s simply no opportunity to get them there in Columbia. You are normally assured a Q1 win with any road win in the SEC, because teams are almost always in the Top 60 of RPI, but not this year. Any loss to Mizzou might end up being Quad 3 loss, which is insane to think about for a road game against an SEC team.

All the other teams mentioned lost the same opportunity when they played Mizzou, but they have that quality win bird in hand already. Ole Miss series is our last assured Q1 opportunity, and its not even guaranteed to stay that way if they somehow fall out of the Top 25.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MSUDOG24 and patdog

MagnoliaHunter

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2007
1,506
1,223
113
I will preface this by saying I have no clue, but it seems like sweeping the team that is currently tied for 12th in the SEC standings has a lot of people suddenly optimistic.

If sweeping the team that is 12th in the SEC, sweeping the team that is currently on whath I would assume is a historic 0-24 in conference right now, and taking one game from a team that is a respectable but not gaudy 13-11 in conference will really get us into the tournament, I would think people were overly despondent about the state of the season. That's not too far off what I would have expected us to do if we hadn't fired Lemonis. If I had to bet, I'd probably have bet dropping one v UK, dropping two at UM, and then sweeping Mizzou and missing the tournament.

ETA: That said, good on whoever made the decision to go ahead and sack Lemonis. If everybody is correct about our chances of making a regional, we had a real risk of backing in and then being in an awkward position as far as firing him. Firing him before some winnable games at the end of the season avoids that and makes it look like we got a boost from firing him and makes it look like we're not in such a bad position talent wise, he had just lost the team.

While all of what you say is true, I am certainly more optimistic than I would be if we had lost 2 of 3 or gotten swept by the currently tied for #12 team, which is where we were headed before last week.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,801
26,190
113
I honestly feel good about this weekend's home series against Ole Miss. We have owned this series for years and they usually find a way to come to Starkville and **** the bed. If we can take 2/3 against UM and 2/3 against Missouri we should be in. Our RPI just moved up 10 spots to #32 after the UK sweep. 4/6 games to finish the season should move us up a few more spots into the upper 20's, even if we drop one on the road to a terrible Missouri team.

That type of finish should move us off the "last 4 in" line and get us a solid 3 seed somewhere. If we **** the bed and go 2/6 to finish then we are probably out.
I think we take 2 this weekend, then sweep Missouri. RPI will stay in the mid 30s, which might get us a #2 seed. Worst case, we only win 1 this weekend and drop a game to Missouri, in which casw
You have to take that data with a grain of salt.

This is a totally new era and a new scheduling platform for baseball with UT and OU on board. It also just happens to be the year that has the worst baseball team in SEC history, and we play them in our final series.

Old format - there are 13 other teams. You play 10 of the 13. Any of the 13 can beat you on any given day. Impossible to avoid the strength of the league as a whole and get at or near .500 unless you earn it.

New format - there are 15 other teams, you only play 10 of the 15 teams. There are currently 7 firm hosts, with Alabama currently looking likely as an 8th. Ole Miss and OU possibly able to make 9 hosts if one of them finishes strong. Of the 7 firm hosts, MSU only played 3 of them. Of the 5 teams out of hosting contention (bottom of the league, pretty much), MSU plays 4 of them. They also play Mizzou, which essentially means they only play a 27-game SEC schedule.

Go check the Quad 1 record of all those previous 14 win SEC teams, and compare it to ours this year. What you’ll find is that they all have 8-10 wins because of schedule strength. We currently have 5. Also go check the RPI’s of those teams and you’ll find they all finished in Top 30 or thereabouts. We don’t have a path to doing that. There are 2 weeks left in the season, and we have exactly one series win over a team that is expected to make the field currently. The resume just isn’t there for us to feel good about 14 wins getting us in.
the real shame in this season is we’ve wasted the easiest sec schedule we’re ever gonna get.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,388
16,454
113
I think Selmon may have been looking at the schedule when he fired Lemonis when he did. He had to go.
State loss several games by one run when they held the lead by three. Taking your pitch hitter Sullivan out of the game to get a faster runner on base in the 6th inning didn't make sense to me. The guy was one of your best reliable hitters and in the worst case he gets one more at bat in the 9th when you really need him. Also seems like he left pitchers in too long and took some out too soon. Those are just a few examples, but he made a lot of bad in game coaching decisions. Hell, I am not a coach, but I am positive in saying if he was the head coach this past weekend, we would have loss the second or third game, possibly both. Firing him was a good decision.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thekimmer

DAWGSANDSAINTS

All-Conference
Oct 10, 2022
2,912
2,668
113
I think a 2 seed only helps us if by some crazy chance we win the Regional we’re in and who we’re paired up with for a Super loses their Regional to a 3 or 2 seed and we get to host the SR.
That’s a lot of good luck to happen but it has before.
I do think we have to win 2, maybe even all three vs OM and definitely sweep MO to be considered for a 2 seed though.
May even have to win 2 in the SEC Trny.