There is no excuse not to. We've seen it way too much where we can't hit anything and an opposing player goes off. Why hasn't this been addressed?
This is a really old complaint that I find to be quite silly.There is no excuse not to. We've seen it way too much where we can't hit anything and an opposing player goes off. Why hasn't this been addressed?
Why do the other teams go off? That’s the issue that should be addressed.There is no excuse not to. We've seen it way too much where we can't hit anything and an opposing player goes off. Why hasn't this been addressed?
There have been games where I thought it seemed like the other team couldn't miss and then you look at the stats and they shot 33% like Vandy did last night. It isn't that the team shot lights out it is that either one guy was hot or they just hit them at big times making it seem like they just didn't miss.Why do the other teams go off? That’s the issue that should be addressed.
What do they practice, though? He doesn't change defenses, run out of bounds plays, make adjustments, game plan for opponents, etc. I guess they could just let them go in there and shoot maybe.There is no excuse not to. We've seen it way too much where we can't hit anything and an opposing player goes off. Why hasn't this been addressed?
What do they practice, though? He doesn't change defenses, run out of bounds plays, make adjustments, game plan for opponents, etc. I guess they could just let them go in there and shoot maybe.
I think it is a big deal, even though this is how it's been under Cal, under Tubby, under Pitino, I think under Sutton and Hall too (I try to forget BCG).
Last night just 1 more made shot could be the difference in a W and L. Shooting is very much streaky and rhythmic (as above said), it's "a feel" you get and you know when you get it. It can only help to at least do the shoot around in there, if not often practice in there. I'm not saying it will increase our shooting %'s 5-10%. But just one more made 3, a couple more made 2's or FTs, can add another win or two a season.
I have said before there is no home court advantage other than crowd noise because of lack of practice thereThere is no excuse not to. We've seen it way too much where we can't hit anything and an opposing player goes off. Why hasn't this been addressed?
Easy fix. Move back to Memorial.Didn't we start doing shoot arounds at Rupp back in January and proceeded to lose to South Carolina and Georgia doing so? Plus UK doesn't own Rupp Arena, and their was an event there that required the court be taken up between games.
Lose Millions of dollars a year.Easy fix. Move back to Memorial.
Didn't we start doing shoot arounds at Rupp back in January and proceeded to lose to South Carolina and Georgia doing so? Plus UK doesn't own Rupp Arena, and their was an event there that required the court be taken up between games.
The first part is true. We started having shootarounds at Rupp when Cal started taking all of the player's phones and iPads away the night before games.Is the first part true?
And as for the second part.. Vandy seemed to be able to get court time in Rupp, so why can't we? This is what I'm talking about.. there should be no scenario where the opposing team gets their shoot around in the arena, and we don't. If it's a shortened time for both teams, then so be it.
Why are we actively trying to make things harder for ourselves?
The first part is true. We started having shootarounds at Rupp when Cal started taking all of the player's phones and iPads away the night before games.
I know this has been addressed previously. But it does make sense to me to practice at Rupp. Big arenas do affect shooting imo especially with our roster turnover.This is a really old complaint that I find to be quite silly.
They did it as recently as the Tennessee game. Can't confirm the Auburn game, but with the amount of pictures with this team and the 96, 97, 98 teams in the locker room I think they did then as well.And it stopped? When? A few weeks later I guess?
Not really a big enough sample size. And regardless, I still see no reason to NOT have our shoot arounds in the gym we are going to be playing a game in. Golfers don't do tournament practice rounds on a course the next town over.. They practice as much as they can on the course they will be playing on.
I do know for the first 40+ years Rupp was open UK had the best home winning percentage in the country. So not practicing there clearly did not prevent that massive accomplishment.I know this has been addressed previously. But it does make sense to me to practice at Rupp. Big arenas do affect shooting imo especially with our roster turnover.
Some freshman play in really small gyms. They can have trouble adjusting to a massive place like Rupp.
I wonder what the players would say themselves.
Probably not a whole lot of freshmen/newcomer laden teams though. I think if anyone stays a second year, they will probably improve.I do know for the first 40+ years Rupp was open UK had the best home winning percentage in the country. So not practicing there clearly did not prevent that massive accomplishment.
All of Cal's highly successful freshman laden teams are included in that time frame. Cal's 51 game home win streak was in that period.Probably not a whole lot of freshmen/newcomer laden teams though. I think if anyone stays a second year, they will probably improve.