Basketball Preview/Game Thread -- 9-Rutgers vs. 1-Purdue

pmvon

All-American
Jan 30, 2007
7,614
7,169
0
Does anyone know why Simpson was out and why he wasn’t running point?
 

Rutgers25

All-American
Jul 29, 2001
7,580
5,796
83
They’ve taken this insinuation that we foul a lot a bit too far.

Thought Pike should have risked Simpson with 2 fouls. Offense got stagnant and allowed Purdue to get back into it
 

ScottRU93

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2003
2,365
2,454
0
Pike needs to say F it and roll with his best 5, foul trouble or not, only shot we have. Cannot have Oskar, Miller, etc in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersNo1

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
All the fouls on us sucks, but forced us to rest players. Rested players could be huge given how Purdue rested all week.

Pike will hammer home the need to avoid reach in fouls or fouls away from the paint. If we can do that while staying fast and physical on D, I really like our chances. But as always, gotta find some scoring and it can’t be just outside shooting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,642
12,632
66
Overall good half ! Our offense became stagnant in last 10 minutes of 1st half because Simpson was on bench with 2 fouls. We were settling too much for jumpers etc
Paul is a baller ! Cliff great job.

We’ll need production from bench which has been non existent to date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LukeRU90

koko2315

All-Conference
Aug 12, 2007
1,115
1,097
68
to be fair we definitley fouled more, and probably by design. wanted to punch them in the mouth, now they are letting the physical play go, but we got a few stupid reaches on simpson and cam
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-Esq and gregkoko

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
Bardo criticizing every foul call on Purdue, all 3 of them. Meanwhile 10 fouls not enough apparently on RU for him
I don't understand the appeal of this guy. And his comments about Edey being t'd up hanging on the rim made no sense. As if being frustrated you didn't get calls allows you to hang on the rim.
 

80RU

All-Conference
Jan 31, 2011
6,249
4,873
113
I did not like Bardo’s comment when Mulcahy drove to the basket and missed because of heavy body contact. He said there was absolutely no foul. There absolutely was and it was a bad no call.
 

Saint Puppy

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
4,566
2,335
113
Bardo criticizing every foul call on Purdue, all 3 of them. Meanwhile 10 fouls not enough apparently on RU for him
I think they definitely let some of our fouls go - we were playing super physical. There may have been some questionable calls on us, but I think it at least evens out.
 

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
120,407
53,185
113
to be fair we definitley fouled more, and probably by design. wanted to punch them in the mouth, now they are letting the physical play go, but we got a few stupid reaches on simpson and cam
EXACTLY They could've called another 15 fouls on us that half especially in the paint. Purdue,doesn't foul much BUT they did miss 1 or 2 on them IMHO. Nothing crazy though.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: NutsWhinesToMods

biazza38

Heisman
Nov 18, 2012
14,056
16,792
81
I don't understand the appeal of this guy. And his comments about Edey being t'd up hanging on the rim made no sense. As if being frustrated you didn't get calls allows you to hang on the rim.
That’s an easy T every time.
It wasn’t a fast break. No one was under him. He hung on it and basically pulled himself up. Pretty easy call
 

Rokodesh

Heisman
Aug 30, 2007
15,488
12,042
73
Simpson has to play nearly the entire second half. His quickness opens up everything. Even Paul plays better because he can focus on finding his spot on the wing rather than running the offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-Esq

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
15,730
13,701
0
We're in the game which is all you can ask. My concern is will we run out of steam in the second half since we played yesterday and Purdue is well rested.